Structured versus unstructured regulation: On procedural mindsets and the mechanisms of priming effects

Kentaro Fujita, Yaacov Trope

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We propose that two distinct regulatory dynamics may produce social psychological priming effects, but under very different conditions. When engaged in structured regulation, people process information in light of their valued goals, responding to salient situational cues only to the extent that those cues are goal-relevant. By contrast, when engaged in unstructured regulation, people are more tuned to the demands of the present, tailoring their responses to the unique circumstances of the immediate context and evincing a greater openness to responding to salient cues in a cueconsistent manner. We explore construal level as one factor that dictates when people engage in one dynamic versus the other. We also discuss the distinction between traditional priming and mindset priming.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)68-87
Number of pages20
JournalSocial Cognition
Volume32
Issue numberSPEC. ISSUE
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Cues
Psychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Structured versus unstructured regulation : On procedural mindsets and the mechanisms of priming effects. / Fujita, Kentaro; Trope, Yaacov.

In: Social Cognition, Vol. 32, No. SPEC. ISSUE, 2014, p. 68-87.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f1970c5560644ee7a9d8355acc3fa103,
title = "Structured versus unstructured regulation: On procedural mindsets and the mechanisms of priming effects",
abstract = "We propose that two distinct regulatory dynamics may produce social psychological priming effects, but under very different conditions. When engaged in structured regulation, people process information in light of their valued goals, responding to salient situational cues only to the extent that those cues are goal-relevant. By contrast, when engaged in unstructured regulation, people are more tuned to the demands of the present, tailoring their responses to the unique circumstances of the immediate context and evincing a greater openness to responding to salient cues in a cueconsistent manner. We explore construal level as one factor that dictates when people engage in one dynamic versus the other. We also discuss the distinction between traditional priming and mindset priming.",
author = "Kentaro Fujita and Yaacov Trope",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1521/soco.2014.32.supp.68",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "68--87",
journal = "Social Cognition",
issn = "0278-016X",
publisher = "Guilford Publications",
number = "SPEC. ISSUE",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structured versus unstructured regulation

T2 - On procedural mindsets and the mechanisms of priming effects

AU - Fujita, Kentaro

AU - Trope, Yaacov

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - We propose that two distinct regulatory dynamics may produce social psychological priming effects, but under very different conditions. When engaged in structured regulation, people process information in light of their valued goals, responding to salient situational cues only to the extent that those cues are goal-relevant. By contrast, when engaged in unstructured regulation, people are more tuned to the demands of the present, tailoring their responses to the unique circumstances of the immediate context and evincing a greater openness to responding to salient cues in a cueconsistent manner. We explore construal level as one factor that dictates when people engage in one dynamic versus the other. We also discuss the distinction between traditional priming and mindset priming.

AB - We propose that two distinct regulatory dynamics may produce social psychological priming effects, but under very different conditions. When engaged in structured regulation, people process information in light of their valued goals, responding to salient situational cues only to the extent that those cues are goal-relevant. By contrast, when engaged in unstructured regulation, people are more tuned to the demands of the present, tailoring their responses to the unique circumstances of the immediate context and evincing a greater openness to responding to salient cues in a cueconsistent manner. We explore construal level as one factor that dictates when people engage in one dynamic versus the other. We also discuss the distinction between traditional priming and mindset priming.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904429078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904429078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1521/soco.2014.32.supp.68

DO - 10.1521/soco.2014.32.supp.68

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84904429078

VL - 32

SP - 68

EP - 87

JO - Social Cognition

JF - Social Cognition

SN - 0278-016X

IS - SPEC. ISSUE

ER -