Stress response and the adolescent transition

Performance versus peer rejection stressors

Laura R. Stroud, Elizabeth Foster, George D. Papandonatos, Kathryn Handwerger, Douglas A. Granger, Katie T. Kivlighan, Raymond Niaura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Little is known about normative variation in stress response over the adolescent transition. This study examined neuroendocrine and cardiovascular responses to performance and peer rejection stressors over the adolescent transition in a normative sample. Participants were 82 healthy children (ages 7-12 years, n = 39, 22 females) and adolescents (ages 13-17, n = 43, 20 females) recruited through community postings. Following a habituation session, participants completed a performance (public speaking, mental arithmetic, mirror tracing) or peer rejection (exclusion challenges) stress session. Salivary cortisol, salivary alpha amylase (sAA), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), and heart rate were measured throughout. Adolescents showed significantly greater cortisol, sAA, SBP, and DBP stress response relative to children. Developmental differences were most pronounced in the performance stress session for cortisol and DBP and in the peer rejection session for sAA and SBP. Heightened physiological stress responses in typical adolescents may facilitate adaptation to new challenges of adolescence and adulthood. In high-risk adolescents, this normative shift may tip the balance toward stress response dysregulation associated with depression and other psychopathology. Specificity of physiological response by stressor type highlights the importance of a multisystem approach to the psychobiology of stress and may also have implications for understanding trajectories to psychopathology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)47-68
Number of pages22
JournalDevelopment and Psychopathology
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Salivary alpha-Amylases
Hydrocortisone
Psychopathology
Blood Pressure
Physiological Stress
Rejection (Psychology)
Heart Rate
Depression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Stroud, L. R., Foster, E., Papandonatos, G. D., Handwerger, K., Granger, D. A., Kivlighan, K. T., & Niaura, R. (2009). Stress response and the adolescent transition: Performance versus peer rejection stressors. Development and Psychopathology, 21(1), 47-68. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579409000042

Stress response and the adolescent transition : Performance versus peer rejection stressors. / Stroud, Laura R.; Foster, Elizabeth; Papandonatos, George D.; Handwerger, Kathryn; Granger, Douglas A.; Kivlighan, Katie T.; Niaura, Raymond.

In: Development and Psychopathology, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2009, p. 47-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stroud, LR, Foster, E, Papandonatos, GD, Handwerger, K, Granger, DA, Kivlighan, KT & Niaura, R 2009, 'Stress response and the adolescent transition: Performance versus peer rejection stressors', Development and Psychopathology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 47-68. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579409000042
Stroud, Laura R. ; Foster, Elizabeth ; Papandonatos, George D. ; Handwerger, Kathryn ; Granger, Douglas A. ; Kivlighan, Katie T. ; Niaura, Raymond. / Stress response and the adolescent transition : Performance versus peer rejection stressors. In: Development and Psychopathology. 2009 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 47-68.
@article{edbb6e8ac22047a7aa864b18893b0b48,
title = "Stress response and the adolescent transition: Performance versus peer rejection stressors",
abstract = "Little is known about normative variation in stress response over the adolescent transition. This study examined neuroendocrine and cardiovascular responses to performance and peer rejection stressors over the adolescent transition in a normative sample. Participants were 82 healthy children (ages 7-12 years, n = 39, 22 females) and adolescents (ages 13-17, n = 43, 20 females) recruited through community postings. Following a habituation session, participants completed a performance (public speaking, mental arithmetic, mirror tracing) or peer rejection (exclusion challenges) stress session. Salivary cortisol, salivary alpha amylase (sAA), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), and heart rate were measured throughout. Adolescents showed significantly greater cortisol, sAA, SBP, and DBP stress response relative to children. Developmental differences were most pronounced in the performance stress session for cortisol and DBP and in the peer rejection session for sAA and SBP. Heightened physiological stress responses in typical adolescents may facilitate adaptation to new challenges of adolescence and adulthood. In high-risk adolescents, this normative shift may tip the balance toward stress response dysregulation associated with depression and other psychopathology. Specificity of physiological response by stressor type highlights the importance of a multisystem approach to the psychobiology of stress and may also have implications for understanding trajectories to psychopathology.",
author = "Stroud, {Laura R.} and Elizabeth Foster and Papandonatos, {George D.} and Kathryn Handwerger and Granger, {Douglas A.} and Kivlighan, {Katie T.} and Raymond Niaura",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1017/S0954579409000042",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "47--68",
journal = "Development and Psychopathology",
issn = "0954-5794",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stress response and the adolescent transition

T2 - Performance versus peer rejection stressors

AU - Stroud, Laura R.

AU - Foster, Elizabeth

AU - Papandonatos, George D.

AU - Handwerger, Kathryn

AU - Granger, Douglas A.

AU - Kivlighan, Katie T.

AU - Niaura, Raymond

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Little is known about normative variation in stress response over the adolescent transition. This study examined neuroendocrine and cardiovascular responses to performance and peer rejection stressors over the adolescent transition in a normative sample. Participants were 82 healthy children (ages 7-12 years, n = 39, 22 females) and adolescents (ages 13-17, n = 43, 20 females) recruited through community postings. Following a habituation session, participants completed a performance (public speaking, mental arithmetic, mirror tracing) or peer rejection (exclusion challenges) stress session. Salivary cortisol, salivary alpha amylase (sAA), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), and heart rate were measured throughout. Adolescents showed significantly greater cortisol, sAA, SBP, and DBP stress response relative to children. Developmental differences were most pronounced in the performance stress session for cortisol and DBP and in the peer rejection session for sAA and SBP. Heightened physiological stress responses in typical adolescents may facilitate adaptation to new challenges of adolescence and adulthood. In high-risk adolescents, this normative shift may tip the balance toward stress response dysregulation associated with depression and other psychopathology. Specificity of physiological response by stressor type highlights the importance of a multisystem approach to the psychobiology of stress and may also have implications for understanding trajectories to psychopathology.

AB - Little is known about normative variation in stress response over the adolescent transition. This study examined neuroendocrine and cardiovascular responses to performance and peer rejection stressors over the adolescent transition in a normative sample. Participants were 82 healthy children (ages 7-12 years, n = 39, 22 females) and adolescents (ages 13-17, n = 43, 20 females) recruited through community postings. Following a habituation session, participants completed a performance (public speaking, mental arithmetic, mirror tracing) or peer rejection (exclusion challenges) stress session. Salivary cortisol, salivary alpha amylase (sAA), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), and heart rate were measured throughout. Adolescents showed significantly greater cortisol, sAA, SBP, and DBP stress response relative to children. Developmental differences were most pronounced in the performance stress session for cortisol and DBP and in the peer rejection session for sAA and SBP. Heightened physiological stress responses in typical adolescents may facilitate adaptation to new challenges of adolescence and adulthood. In high-risk adolescents, this normative shift may tip the balance toward stress response dysregulation associated with depression and other psychopathology. Specificity of physiological response by stressor type highlights the importance of a multisystem approach to the psychobiology of stress and may also have implications for understanding trajectories to psychopathology.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62549128325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=62549128325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0954579409000042

DO - 10.1017/S0954579409000042

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 47

EP - 68

JO - Development and Psychopathology

JF - Development and Psychopathology

SN - 0954-5794

IS - 1

ER -