Strategies to improve the dietary quality of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) beneficiaries: An assessment of stakeholder opinions

Susan J. Blumenthal, Elena E. Hoffnagle, Cindy W. Leung, Hayley Lofink, Helen H. Jensen, Susan B. Foerster, Lilian W Y Cheung, Marion Nestle, Walter C. Willett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective To examine the opinions of stakeholders on strategies to improve dietary quality of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants. Design Participants answered a thirty-eight-item web-based survey assessing opinions and perceptions of SNAP and programme policy changes. Setting USA. Subjects Survey of 522 individuals with stakeholder interest in SNAP, conducted in October through December 2011. Results The top three barriers to improving dietary quality identified were: (i) unhealthy foods marketed in low-income communities; (ii) the high cost of healthy foods; and (III) lifestyle challenges faced by low-income individuals. Many respondents (70 %) also disagreed that current SNAP benefit levels were adequate to maintain a healthy diet. Stakeholders believed that vouchers, coupons or monetary incentives for purchasing healthful foods might have the greatest potential for improving the diets of SNAP participants. Many respondents (78 %) agreed that sodas should not be eligible for purchases with SNAP benefits. More than half (55 %) believed retailers could easily implement such restrictions. A majority of respondents (58 %) agreed that stores should stock a minimum quantity of healthful foods in order to be certified as a SNAP retailer, and most respondents (83 %) believed that the US Department of Agriculture should collect data on the foods purchased with SNAP benefits. Conclusions Results suggest that there is broad stakeholder support for policies that align SNAP purchase eligibility with national public health goals of reducing food insecurity, improving nutrition and preventing obesity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2824-2833
Number of pages10
JournalPublic Health Nutrition
Volume17
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 6 2013

Fingerprint

Food Assistance
Food
United States Department of Agriculture
Food Supply
Surveys and Questionnaires
Life Style
Motivation
Public Health
Obesity

Keywords

  • Diet quality
  • Food insecurity
  • Policies
  • SNAP

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Blumenthal, S. J., Hoffnagle, E. E., Leung, C. W., Lofink, H., Jensen, H. H., Foerster, S. B., ... Willett, W. C. (2013). Strategies to improve the dietary quality of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) beneficiaries: An assessment of stakeholder opinions. Public Health Nutrition, 17(12), 2824-2833. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980013002942

Strategies to improve the dietary quality of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) beneficiaries : An assessment of stakeholder opinions. / Blumenthal, Susan J.; Hoffnagle, Elena E.; Leung, Cindy W.; Lofink, Hayley; Jensen, Helen H.; Foerster, Susan B.; Cheung, Lilian W Y; Nestle, Marion; Willett, Walter C.

In: Public Health Nutrition, Vol. 17, No. 12, 06.09.2013, p. 2824-2833.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Blumenthal, SJ, Hoffnagle, EE, Leung, CW, Lofink, H, Jensen, HH, Foerster, SB, Cheung, LWY, Nestle, M & Willett, WC 2013, 'Strategies to improve the dietary quality of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) beneficiaries: An assessment of stakeholder opinions', Public Health Nutrition, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 2824-2833. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980013002942
Blumenthal, Susan J. ; Hoffnagle, Elena E. ; Leung, Cindy W. ; Lofink, Hayley ; Jensen, Helen H. ; Foerster, Susan B. ; Cheung, Lilian W Y ; Nestle, Marion ; Willett, Walter C. / Strategies to improve the dietary quality of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) beneficiaries : An assessment of stakeholder opinions. In: Public Health Nutrition. 2013 ; Vol. 17, No. 12. pp. 2824-2833.
@article{52ae18a69f6d41559d8ee969c3356b9e,
title = "Strategies to improve the dietary quality of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) beneficiaries: An assessment of stakeholder opinions",
abstract = "Objective To examine the opinions of stakeholders on strategies to improve dietary quality of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants. Design Participants answered a thirty-eight-item web-based survey assessing opinions and perceptions of SNAP and programme policy changes. Setting USA. Subjects Survey of 522 individuals with stakeholder interest in SNAP, conducted in October through December 2011. Results The top three barriers to improving dietary quality identified were: (i) unhealthy foods marketed in low-income communities; (ii) the high cost of healthy foods; and (III) lifestyle challenges faced by low-income individuals. Many respondents (70 {\%}) also disagreed that current SNAP benefit levels were adequate to maintain a healthy diet. Stakeholders believed that vouchers, coupons or monetary incentives for purchasing healthful foods might have the greatest potential for improving the diets of SNAP participants. Many respondents (78 {\%}) agreed that sodas should not be eligible for purchases with SNAP benefits. More than half (55 {\%}) believed retailers could easily implement such restrictions. A majority of respondents (58 {\%}) agreed that stores should stock a minimum quantity of healthful foods in order to be certified as a SNAP retailer, and most respondents (83 {\%}) believed that the US Department of Agriculture should collect data on the foods purchased with SNAP benefits. Conclusions Results suggest that there is broad stakeholder support for policies that align SNAP purchase eligibility with national public health goals of reducing food insecurity, improving nutrition and preventing obesity.",
keywords = "Diet quality, Food insecurity, Policies, SNAP",
author = "Blumenthal, {Susan J.} and Hoffnagle, {Elena E.} and Leung, {Cindy W.} and Hayley Lofink and Jensen, {Helen H.} and Foerster, {Susan B.} and Cheung, {Lilian W Y} and Marion Nestle and Willett, {Walter C.}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1017/S1368980013002942",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "2824--2833",
journal = "Public Health Nutrition",
issn = "1368-9800",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Strategies to improve the dietary quality of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) beneficiaries

T2 - An assessment of stakeholder opinions

AU - Blumenthal, Susan J.

AU - Hoffnagle, Elena E.

AU - Leung, Cindy W.

AU - Lofink, Hayley

AU - Jensen, Helen H.

AU - Foerster, Susan B.

AU - Cheung, Lilian W Y

AU - Nestle, Marion

AU - Willett, Walter C.

PY - 2013/9/6

Y1 - 2013/9/6

N2 - Objective To examine the opinions of stakeholders on strategies to improve dietary quality of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants. Design Participants answered a thirty-eight-item web-based survey assessing opinions and perceptions of SNAP and programme policy changes. Setting USA. Subjects Survey of 522 individuals with stakeholder interest in SNAP, conducted in October through December 2011. Results The top three barriers to improving dietary quality identified were: (i) unhealthy foods marketed in low-income communities; (ii) the high cost of healthy foods; and (III) lifestyle challenges faced by low-income individuals. Many respondents (70 %) also disagreed that current SNAP benefit levels were adequate to maintain a healthy diet. Stakeholders believed that vouchers, coupons or monetary incentives for purchasing healthful foods might have the greatest potential for improving the diets of SNAP participants. Many respondents (78 %) agreed that sodas should not be eligible for purchases with SNAP benefits. More than half (55 %) believed retailers could easily implement such restrictions. A majority of respondents (58 %) agreed that stores should stock a minimum quantity of healthful foods in order to be certified as a SNAP retailer, and most respondents (83 %) believed that the US Department of Agriculture should collect data on the foods purchased with SNAP benefits. Conclusions Results suggest that there is broad stakeholder support for policies that align SNAP purchase eligibility with national public health goals of reducing food insecurity, improving nutrition and preventing obesity.

AB - Objective To examine the opinions of stakeholders on strategies to improve dietary quality of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants. Design Participants answered a thirty-eight-item web-based survey assessing opinions and perceptions of SNAP and programme policy changes. Setting USA. Subjects Survey of 522 individuals with stakeholder interest in SNAP, conducted in October through December 2011. Results The top three barriers to improving dietary quality identified were: (i) unhealthy foods marketed in low-income communities; (ii) the high cost of healthy foods; and (III) lifestyle challenges faced by low-income individuals. Many respondents (70 %) also disagreed that current SNAP benefit levels were adequate to maintain a healthy diet. Stakeholders believed that vouchers, coupons or monetary incentives for purchasing healthful foods might have the greatest potential for improving the diets of SNAP participants. Many respondents (78 %) agreed that sodas should not be eligible for purchases with SNAP benefits. More than half (55 %) believed retailers could easily implement such restrictions. A majority of respondents (58 %) agreed that stores should stock a minimum quantity of healthful foods in order to be certified as a SNAP retailer, and most respondents (83 %) believed that the US Department of Agriculture should collect data on the foods purchased with SNAP benefits. Conclusions Results suggest that there is broad stakeholder support for policies that align SNAP purchase eligibility with national public health goals of reducing food insecurity, improving nutrition and preventing obesity.

KW - Diet quality

KW - Food insecurity

KW - Policies

KW - SNAP

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84910671583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84910671583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1368980013002942

DO - 10.1017/S1368980013002942

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 2824

EP - 2833

JO - Public Health Nutrition

JF - Public Health Nutrition

SN - 1368-9800

IS - 12

ER -