Strategies for detecting joint dichotomous moderators in human resource management research

Dimitri Liakhovitski, Eugene F. Stone-Romero, James J. Jaccard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The operation of joint dichotomous moderators is common in the human resource management (HRM) field and other disciplines, and several strategies are available for detecting their effects. However, at present, little is known about the relative ability (i.e., the statistical power) of these strategies for detecting the effects of joint moderators. Thus, Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to compare the statistical power of the moderated multiple regression (MMR) and the Jones [Jones, M.B. (1968). Correlation as a dependent variable. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 69-72.] procedure for detecting joint dichotomous moderators under conditions of heterogeneity of within-group error variances. The simulations involved manipulations of total sample size, proportion of cases in moderator-based subgroups, magnitude of the joint moderating effect in the population, and the reliability of scores. Results showed that these manipulations had similar main and interactive effects on the statistical power of both methods. In most study conditions, the Jones procedure slightly outperformed MMR in terms of power. This power advantage was most pronounced when the sample size was large, subgroup proportions equaled .4 or .5, and reliability was high. Implications are considered for HRM research in which joint moderating effects are tested.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)164-179
Number of pages16
JournalHuman Resource Management Review
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2008

Fingerprint

Joints
Sample Size
Research
Psychology
Population
Moderator
Human resource management research
Statistical power
Sample size
Proportion
Manipulation
Multiple regression
Moderating effect

Keywords

  • Joint moderator variables
  • Moderator variables
  • Three-way interactions for continuous variables

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Strategies for detecting joint dichotomous moderators in human resource management research. / Liakhovitski, Dimitri; Stone-Romero, Eugene F.; Jaccard, James J.

In: Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 18, No. 3, 09.2008, p. 164-179.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{48bf1c58de8a45c48504830ab730988f,
title = "Strategies for detecting joint dichotomous moderators in human resource management research",
abstract = "The operation of joint dichotomous moderators is common in the human resource management (HRM) field and other disciplines, and several strategies are available for detecting their effects. However, at present, little is known about the relative ability (i.e., the statistical power) of these strategies for detecting the effects of joint moderators. Thus, Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to compare the statistical power of the moderated multiple regression (MMR) and the Jones [Jones, M.B. (1968). Correlation as a dependent variable. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 69-72.] procedure for detecting joint dichotomous moderators under conditions of heterogeneity of within-group error variances. The simulations involved manipulations of total sample size, proportion of cases in moderator-based subgroups, magnitude of the joint moderating effect in the population, and the reliability of scores. Results showed that these manipulations had similar main and interactive effects on the statistical power of both methods. In most study conditions, the Jones procedure slightly outperformed MMR in terms of power. This power advantage was most pronounced when the sample size was large, subgroup proportions equaled .4 or .5, and reliability was high. Implications are considered for HRM research in which joint moderating effects are tested.",
keywords = "Joint moderator variables, Moderator variables, Three-way interactions for continuous variables",
author = "Dimitri Liakhovitski and Stone-Romero, {Eugene F.} and Jaccard, {James J.}",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.07.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "164--179",
journal = "Human Resource Management Review",
issn = "1053-4822",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Strategies for detecting joint dichotomous moderators in human resource management research

AU - Liakhovitski, Dimitri

AU - Stone-Romero, Eugene F.

AU - Jaccard, James J.

PY - 2008/9

Y1 - 2008/9

N2 - The operation of joint dichotomous moderators is common in the human resource management (HRM) field and other disciplines, and several strategies are available for detecting their effects. However, at present, little is known about the relative ability (i.e., the statistical power) of these strategies for detecting the effects of joint moderators. Thus, Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to compare the statistical power of the moderated multiple regression (MMR) and the Jones [Jones, M.B. (1968). Correlation as a dependent variable. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 69-72.] procedure for detecting joint dichotomous moderators under conditions of heterogeneity of within-group error variances. The simulations involved manipulations of total sample size, proportion of cases in moderator-based subgroups, magnitude of the joint moderating effect in the population, and the reliability of scores. Results showed that these manipulations had similar main and interactive effects on the statistical power of both methods. In most study conditions, the Jones procedure slightly outperformed MMR in terms of power. This power advantage was most pronounced when the sample size was large, subgroup proportions equaled .4 or .5, and reliability was high. Implications are considered for HRM research in which joint moderating effects are tested.

AB - The operation of joint dichotomous moderators is common in the human resource management (HRM) field and other disciplines, and several strategies are available for detecting their effects. However, at present, little is known about the relative ability (i.e., the statistical power) of these strategies for detecting the effects of joint moderators. Thus, Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to compare the statistical power of the moderated multiple regression (MMR) and the Jones [Jones, M.B. (1968). Correlation as a dependent variable. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 69-72.] procedure for detecting joint dichotomous moderators under conditions of heterogeneity of within-group error variances. The simulations involved manipulations of total sample size, proportion of cases in moderator-based subgroups, magnitude of the joint moderating effect in the population, and the reliability of scores. Results showed that these manipulations had similar main and interactive effects on the statistical power of both methods. In most study conditions, the Jones procedure slightly outperformed MMR in terms of power. This power advantage was most pronounced when the sample size was large, subgroup proportions equaled .4 or .5, and reliability was high. Implications are considered for HRM research in which joint moderating effects are tested.

KW - Joint moderator variables

KW - Moderator variables

KW - Three-way interactions for continuous variables

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=51249117815&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=51249117815&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.07.005

DO - 10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.07.005

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:51249117815

VL - 18

SP - 164

EP - 179

JO - Human Resource Management Review

JF - Human Resource Management Review

SN - 1053-4822

IS - 3

ER -