Strategic regulation of mimicry effects by implementation intentions

Frank Wieber, Peter M. Gollwitzer, Paschal Sheeran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Although mimicry generally facilitates social interaction, sometimes mimicry effects can hamper pursuit of focal goals. Two studies tested whether the self-regulation strategy of forming implementation intentions (i.e., planning in advance the when, where, and how of one's goal striving) can be used to regulate mimicry effects. In Study 1, implementation intentions to be non-prejudiced ensured that mimicking increased attraction even for an unlikable person. In Study 2, implementation intentions to be thrifty reduced participants' susceptibility to the persuasive effects of being mimicked. Mere goal intentions to be non-prejudiced and to be thrifty did not suffice to regulate mimicry effects. We conclude that the strategic automaticity accomplished by implementation intentions allows people to intentionally strengthen (Study 1) and weaken (Study 2) mimicry effects in line with their goals. Implications for the effective self-regulation of mimicry effects are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)31-39
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume53
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2014

Fingerprint

regulation
self-regulation
Interpersonal Relations
planning
human being
interaction
Self-Control

Keywords

  • Automaticity
  • Goal intention
  • Implementation intention
  • Mimicry
  • Self-regulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Strategic regulation of mimicry effects by implementation intentions. / Wieber, Frank; Gollwitzer, Peter M.; Sheeran, Paschal.

In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 53, 07.2014, p. 31-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{da195802741b4cbd940300707e01e5df,
title = "Strategic regulation of mimicry effects by implementation intentions",
abstract = "Although mimicry generally facilitates social interaction, sometimes mimicry effects can hamper pursuit of focal goals. Two studies tested whether the self-regulation strategy of forming implementation intentions (i.e., planning in advance the when, where, and how of one's goal striving) can be used to regulate mimicry effects. In Study 1, implementation intentions to be non-prejudiced ensured that mimicking increased attraction even for an unlikable person. In Study 2, implementation intentions to be thrifty reduced participants' susceptibility to the persuasive effects of being mimicked. Mere goal intentions to be non-prejudiced and to be thrifty did not suffice to regulate mimicry effects. We conclude that the strategic automaticity accomplished by implementation intentions allows people to intentionally strengthen (Study 1) and weaken (Study 2) mimicry effects in line with their goals. Implications for the effective self-regulation of mimicry effects are discussed.",
keywords = "Automaticity, Goal intention, Implementation intention, Mimicry, Self-regulation",
author = "Frank Wieber and Gollwitzer, {Peter M.} and Paschal Sheeran",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.jesp.2014.02.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "31--39",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-1031",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Strategic regulation of mimicry effects by implementation intentions

AU - Wieber, Frank

AU - Gollwitzer, Peter M.

AU - Sheeran, Paschal

PY - 2014/7

Y1 - 2014/7

N2 - Although mimicry generally facilitates social interaction, sometimes mimicry effects can hamper pursuit of focal goals. Two studies tested whether the self-regulation strategy of forming implementation intentions (i.e., planning in advance the when, where, and how of one's goal striving) can be used to regulate mimicry effects. In Study 1, implementation intentions to be non-prejudiced ensured that mimicking increased attraction even for an unlikable person. In Study 2, implementation intentions to be thrifty reduced participants' susceptibility to the persuasive effects of being mimicked. Mere goal intentions to be non-prejudiced and to be thrifty did not suffice to regulate mimicry effects. We conclude that the strategic automaticity accomplished by implementation intentions allows people to intentionally strengthen (Study 1) and weaken (Study 2) mimicry effects in line with their goals. Implications for the effective self-regulation of mimicry effects are discussed.

AB - Although mimicry generally facilitates social interaction, sometimes mimicry effects can hamper pursuit of focal goals. Two studies tested whether the self-regulation strategy of forming implementation intentions (i.e., planning in advance the when, where, and how of one's goal striving) can be used to regulate mimicry effects. In Study 1, implementation intentions to be non-prejudiced ensured that mimicking increased attraction even for an unlikable person. In Study 2, implementation intentions to be thrifty reduced participants' susceptibility to the persuasive effects of being mimicked. Mere goal intentions to be non-prejudiced and to be thrifty did not suffice to regulate mimicry effects. We conclude that the strategic automaticity accomplished by implementation intentions allows people to intentionally strengthen (Study 1) and weaken (Study 2) mimicry effects in line with their goals. Implications for the effective self-regulation of mimicry effects are discussed.

KW - Automaticity

KW - Goal intention

KW - Implementation intention

KW - Mimicry

KW - Self-regulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894656839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894656839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.02.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.02.002

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 31

EP - 39

JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

SN - 0022-1031

ER -