Stimulus Typicality Determines How Broadly Fear Is Generalized

Joseph E. Dunsmoor, Gregory Murphy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The ability to represent knowledge at the category level promotes the transfer of learning. How this ability integrates with basic forms of conditioned learning is unknown but could explain why conditioned fear is overgeneralized after aversive experiences. We examined the impact of stimulus typicality—an important determinant of category-based induction—on fear learning and generalization. Typicality is known to affect the strength of categorical arguments; a premise involving typical exemplars (e.g., sparrow) is believed to apply to other members, whereas a premise about atypical exemplars (e.g., penguin) generalizes more narrowly to similar items. We adopted this framework to human fear conditioning and found that fear conditioned to typical exemplars generalized more readily to atypical members than vice versa, despite equal feature overlap across conditions. These findings have implications for understanding why some fearful events lead to broad overgeneralization of fear whereas others are regarded as isolated episodes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1816-1821
Number of pages6
JournalPsychological Science
Volume25
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 27 2014

Fingerprint

Fear
Aptitude
Spheniscidae
Learning
Sparrows
Typicality
Stimulus

Keywords

  • category-based induction
  • fear conditioning
  • generalization
  • reasoning
  • skin conductance responses

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Stimulus Typicality Determines How Broadly Fear Is Generalized. / Dunsmoor, Joseph E.; Murphy, Gregory.

In: Psychological Science, Vol. 25, No. 9, 27.09.2014, p. 1816-1821.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dunsmoor, Joseph E. ; Murphy, Gregory. / Stimulus Typicality Determines How Broadly Fear Is Generalized. In: Psychological Science. 2014 ; Vol. 25, No. 9. pp. 1816-1821.
@article{a4c8a422aa564aa3802333043f460688,
title = "Stimulus Typicality Determines How Broadly Fear Is Generalized",
abstract = "The ability to represent knowledge at the category level promotes the transfer of learning. How this ability integrates with basic forms of conditioned learning is unknown but could explain why conditioned fear is overgeneralized after aversive experiences. We examined the impact of stimulus typicality—an important determinant of category-based induction—on fear learning and generalization. Typicality is known to affect the strength of categorical arguments; a premise involving typical exemplars (e.g., sparrow) is believed to apply to other members, whereas a premise about atypical exemplars (e.g., penguin) generalizes more narrowly to similar items. We adopted this framework to human fear conditioning and found that fear conditioned to typical exemplars generalized more readily to atypical members than vice versa, despite equal feature overlap across conditions. These findings have implications for understanding why some fearful events lead to broad overgeneralization of fear whereas others are regarded as isolated episodes.",
keywords = "category-based induction, fear conditioning, generalization, reasoning, skin conductance responses",
author = "Dunsmoor, {Joseph E.} and Gregory Murphy",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1177/0956797614535401",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "1816--1821",
journal = "Psychological Science",
issn = "0956-7976",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stimulus Typicality Determines How Broadly Fear Is Generalized

AU - Dunsmoor, Joseph E.

AU - Murphy, Gregory

PY - 2014/9/27

Y1 - 2014/9/27

N2 - The ability to represent knowledge at the category level promotes the transfer of learning. How this ability integrates with basic forms of conditioned learning is unknown but could explain why conditioned fear is overgeneralized after aversive experiences. We examined the impact of stimulus typicality—an important determinant of category-based induction—on fear learning and generalization. Typicality is known to affect the strength of categorical arguments; a premise involving typical exemplars (e.g., sparrow) is believed to apply to other members, whereas a premise about atypical exemplars (e.g., penguin) generalizes more narrowly to similar items. We adopted this framework to human fear conditioning and found that fear conditioned to typical exemplars generalized more readily to atypical members than vice versa, despite equal feature overlap across conditions. These findings have implications for understanding why some fearful events lead to broad overgeneralization of fear whereas others are regarded as isolated episodes.

AB - The ability to represent knowledge at the category level promotes the transfer of learning. How this ability integrates with basic forms of conditioned learning is unknown but could explain why conditioned fear is overgeneralized after aversive experiences. We examined the impact of stimulus typicality—an important determinant of category-based induction—on fear learning and generalization. Typicality is known to affect the strength of categorical arguments; a premise involving typical exemplars (e.g., sparrow) is believed to apply to other members, whereas a premise about atypical exemplars (e.g., penguin) generalizes more narrowly to similar items. We adopted this framework to human fear conditioning and found that fear conditioned to typical exemplars generalized more readily to atypical members than vice versa, despite equal feature overlap across conditions. These findings have implications for understanding why some fearful events lead to broad overgeneralization of fear whereas others are regarded as isolated episodes.

KW - category-based induction

KW - fear conditioning

KW - generalization

KW - reasoning

KW - skin conductance responses

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908086867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908086867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0956797614535401

DO - 10.1177/0956797614535401

M3 - Article

C2 - 25015685

AN - SCOPUS:84908086867

VL - 25

SP - 1816

EP - 1821

JO - Psychological Science

JF - Psychological Science

SN - 0956-7976

IS - 9

ER -