Stimulus ensemble and cortical layer determine V1 spatial receptive fields

Chun I. Yeh, Dajun Xing, Patrick E. Williams, Robert Shapley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The concept of receptive field is a linear, feed-forward view of visual signal processing. Frequently used models of V1 neurons, like the dynamic linear filter static nonlinearity Poisson spike encoder model, predict that receptive fields measured with different stimulus ensembles should be similar. Here, we tested this concept by comparing spatiotemporal maps of V1 neurons derived from two very different, but commonly used, stimulus ensembles: sparse noise and Hartley subspace stimuli. We found maps from the two methods agreed for neurons in input layer 4C but were very different for neurons in superficial layers of V1. Many layer 2/3 cells have receptive fields with multiple elongated subregions when mapped with Hartley stimuli, but their spatial maps collapse to only a single, less-elongated subregion when mapped with sparse noise. Moreover, for upper layer V1 neurons, the preferred orientation for Hartley maps is much closer to the preferred orientation measured with drifting gratings than is the orientation preference of sparse-noise maps. These results challenge the concept of a stimulus-invariant receptive field and imply that intracortical interactions shape fundamental properties of layer 2/3 neurons.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)14652-14657
Number of pages6
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume106
Issue number34
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 25 2009

Fingerprint

Neurons
Noise

Keywords

  • Hartley subspace
  • Primary visual cortex
  • Reverse correlation
  • Sparse noise

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Stimulus ensemble and cortical layer determine V1 spatial receptive fields. / Yeh, Chun I.; Xing, Dajun; Williams, Patrick E.; Shapley, Robert.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 106, No. 34, 25.08.2009, p. 14652-14657.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{32867db0ae3844ceb8dda53536f726ca,
title = "Stimulus ensemble and cortical layer determine V1 spatial receptive fields",
abstract = "The concept of receptive field is a linear, feed-forward view of visual signal processing. Frequently used models of V1 neurons, like the dynamic linear filter static nonlinearity Poisson spike encoder model, predict that receptive fields measured with different stimulus ensembles should be similar. Here, we tested this concept by comparing spatiotemporal maps of V1 neurons derived from two very different, but commonly used, stimulus ensembles: sparse noise and Hartley subspace stimuli. We found maps from the two methods agreed for neurons in input layer 4C but were very different for neurons in superficial layers of V1. Many layer 2/3 cells have receptive fields with multiple elongated subregions when mapped with Hartley stimuli, but their spatial maps collapse to only a single, less-elongated subregion when mapped with sparse noise. Moreover, for upper layer V1 neurons, the preferred orientation for Hartley maps is much closer to the preferred orientation measured with drifting gratings than is the orientation preference of sparse-noise maps. These results challenge the concept of a stimulus-invariant receptive field and imply that intracortical interactions shape fundamental properties of layer 2/3 neurons.",
keywords = "Hartley subspace, Primary visual cortex, Reverse correlation, Sparse noise",
author = "Yeh, {Chun I.} and Dajun Xing and Williams, {Patrick E.} and Robert Shapley",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.0907406106",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "106",
pages = "14652--14657",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "34",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stimulus ensemble and cortical layer determine V1 spatial receptive fields

AU - Yeh, Chun I.

AU - Xing, Dajun

AU - Williams, Patrick E.

AU - Shapley, Robert

PY - 2009/8/25

Y1 - 2009/8/25

N2 - The concept of receptive field is a linear, feed-forward view of visual signal processing. Frequently used models of V1 neurons, like the dynamic linear filter static nonlinearity Poisson spike encoder model, predict that receptive fields measured with different stimulus ensembles should be similar. Here, we tested this concept by comparing spatiotemporal maps of V1 neurons derived from two very different, but commonly used, stimulus ensembles: sparse noise and Hartley subspace stimuli. We found maps from the two methods agreed for neurons in input layer 4C but were very different for neurons in superficial layers of V1. Many layer 2/3 cells have receptive fields with multiple elongated subregions when mapped with Hartley stimuli, but their spatial maps collapse to only a single, less-elongated subregion when mapped with sparse noise. Moreover, for upper layer V1 neurons, the preferred orientation for Hartley maps is much closer to the preferred orientation measured with drifting gratings than is the orientation preference of sparse-noise maps. These results challenge the concept of a stimulus-invariant receptive field and imply that intracortical interactions shape fundamental properties of layer 2/3 neurons.

AB - The concept of receptive field is a linear, feed-forward view of visual signal processing. Frequently used models of V1 neurons, like the dynamic linear filter static nonlinearity Poisson spike encoder model, predict that receptive fields measured with different stimulus ensembles should be similar. Here, we tested this concept by comparing spatiotemporal maps of V1 neurons derived from two very different, but commonly used, stimulus ensembles: sparse noise and Hartley subspace stimuli. We found maps from the two methods agreed for neurons in input layer 4C but were very different for neurons in superficial layers of V1. Many layer 2/3 cells have receptive fields with multiple elongated subregions when mapped with Hartley stimuli, but their spatial maps collapse to only a single, less-elongated subregion when mapped with sparse noise. Moreover, for upper layer V1 neurons, the preferred orientation for Hartley maps is much closer to the preferred orientation measured with drifting gratings than is the orientation preference of sparse-noise maps. These results challenge the concept of a stimulus-invariant receptive field and imply that intracortical interactions shape fundamental properties of layer 2/3 neurons.

KW - Hartley subspace

KW - Primary visual cortex

KW - Reverse correlation

KW - Sparse noise

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70149100418&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70149100418&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.0907406106

DO - 10.1073/pnas.0907406106

M3 - Article

VL - 106

SP - 14652

EP - 14657

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 34

ER -