Statistical occurrence and mechanisms of the 2014–2016 delayed super El Niño captured by a simple dynamical model

Sulian Thual, Andrew Majda, Nan Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The recent 2014–2016 period was marked by a failed El Niño favoring a subsequent extreme El Niño with dramatic worldwide impacts. Here this new type of major event so-called the delayed super El Niño is realistically captured by a simple dynamical model for the equatorial Pacific with emphasis on the role of state-dependent stochastic wind bursts. We analyze qualitative analogues for this event compared and contrasted with the 1997–1998 super El Niño in ensemble experiments based on the simple model. In agreement with recent studies, the timing and intensity of such an event is strongly controlled by atmospheric wind bursts, both easterly and westerly. In particular, the early stalling by easterly wind bursts and subsequent development by westerly wind bursts as observed during 2014–2016 is consistently retrieved. We show in addition that individual wind bursts may control the main characteristics of the event only during its early development while sequences of consecutive wind bursts have more important cumulative effects. Another important result from the present analysis is the significant statistical occurence of the delayed super El Niño (around 20–30%) compared with the one of directly formed super events as that of 1997–1998. Such a high occurence is directly linked to the random evolution of wind bursts and is retrieved here for all phases of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation used for the initiation of the ensemble experiments. These results suggest that the delayed super El Niño is not an unusual type of super event and could reoccur in the future.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalClimate Dynamics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jun 2 2018

Fingerprint

westerly
experiment
oscillation
analysis
effect

Keywords

  • Delayed super El Niño
  • Ensemble experiments
  • Simple dynamical models
  • Stochastic wind bursts

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Statistical occurrence and mechanisms of the 2014–2016 delayed super El Niño captured by a simple dynamical model. / Thual, Sulian; Majda, Andrew; Chen, Nan.

In: Climate Dynamics, 02.06.2018, p. 1-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7d922f04df264befa12055832dbab98b,
title = "Statistical occurrence and mechanisms of the 2014–2016 delayed super El Ni{\~n}o captured by a simple dynamical model",
abstract = "The recent 2014–2016 period was marked by a failed El Ni{\~n}o favoring a subsequent extreme El Ni{\~n}o with dramatic worldwide impacts. Here this new type of major event so-called the delayed super El Ni{\~n}o is realistically captured by a simple dynamical model for the equatorial Pacific with emphasis on the role of state-dependent stochastic wind bursts. We analyze qualitative analogues for this event compared and contrasted with the 1997–1998 super El Ni{\~n}o in ensemble experiments based on the simple model. In agreement with recent studies, the timing and intensity of such an event is strongly controlled by atmospheric wind bursts, both easterly and westerly. In particular, the early stalling by easterly wind bursts and subsequent development by westerly wind bursts as observed during 2014–2016 is consistently retrieved. We show in addition that individual wind bursts may control the main characteristics of the event only during its early development while sequences of consecutive wind bursts have more important cumulative effects. Another important result from the present analysis is the significant statistical occurence of the delayed super El Ni{\~n}o (around 20–30{\%}) compared with the one of directly formed super events as that of 1997–1998. Such a high occurence is directly linked to the random evolution of wind bursts and is retrieved here for all phases of the El Ni{\~n}o–Southern Oscillation used for the initiation of the ensemble experiments. These results suggest that the delayed super El Ni{\~n}o is not an unusual type of super event and could reoccur in the future.",
keywords = "Delayed super El Ni{\~n}o, Ensemble experiments, Simple dynamical models, Stochastic wind bursts",
author = "Sulian Thual and Andrew Majda and Nan Chen",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1007/s00382-018-4265-5",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "Climate Dynamics",
issn = "0930-7575",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Statistical occurrence and mechanisms of the 2014–2016 delayed super El Niño captured by a simple dynamical model

AU - Thual, Sulian

AU - Majda, Andrew

AU - Chen, Nan

PY - 2018/6/2

Y1 - 2018/6/2

N2 - The recent 2014–2016 period was marked by a failed El Niño favoring a subsequent extreme El Niño with dramatic worldwide impacts. Here this new type of major event so-called the delayed super El Niño is realistically captured by a simple dynamical model for the equatorial Pacific with emphasis on the role of state-dependent stochastic wind bursts. We analyze qualitative analogues for this event compared and contrasted with the 1997–1998 super El Niño in ensemble experiments based on the simple model. In agreement with recent studies, the timing and intensity of such an event is strongly controlled by atmospheric wind bursts, both easterly and westerly. In particular, the early stalling by easterly wind bursts and subsequent development by westerly wind bursts as observed during 2014–2016 is consistently retrieved. We show in addition that individual wind bursts may control the main characteristics of the event only during its early development while sequences of consecutive wind bursts have more important cumulative effects. Another important result from the present analysis is the significant statistical occurence of the delayed super El Niño (around 20–30%) compared with the one of directly formed super events as that of 1997–1998. Such a high occurence is directly linked to the random evolution of wind bursts and is retrieved here for all phases of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation used for the initiation of the ensemble experiments. These results suggest that the delayed super El Niño is not an unusual type of super event and could reoccur in the future.

AB - The recent 2014–2016 period was marked by a failed El Niño favoring a subsequent extreme El Niño with dramatic worldwide impacts. Here this new type of major event so-called the delayed super El Niño is realistically captured by a simple dynamical model for the equatorial Pacific with emphasis on the role of state-dependent stochastic wind bursts. We analyze qualitative analogues for this event compared and contrasted with the 1997–1998 super El Niño in ensemble experiments based on the simple model. In agreement with recent studies, the timing and intensity of such an event is strongly controlled by atmospheric wind bursts, both easterly and westerly. In particular, the early stalling by easterly wind bursts and subsequent development by westerly wind bursts as observed during 2014–2016 is consistently retrieved. We show in addition that individual wind bursts may control the main characteristics of the event only during its early development while sequences of consecutive wind bursts have more important cumulative effects. Another important result from the present analysis is the significant statistical occurence of the delayed super El Niño (around 20–30%) compared with the one of directly formed super events as that of 1997–1998. Such a high occurence is directly linked to the random evolution of wind bursts and is retrieved here for all phases of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation used for the initiation of the ensemble experiments. These results suggest that the delayed super El Niño is not an unusual type of super event and could reoccur in the future.

KW - Delayed super El Niño

KW - Ensemble experiments

KW - Simple dynamical models

KW - Stochastic wind bursts

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047901059&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047901059&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00382-018-4265-5

DO - 10.1007/s00382-018-4265-5

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - Climate Dynamics

JF - Climate Dynamics

SN - 0930-7575

ER -