Spreading rationalization: Increased support for large-scale and small-scale social systems following system threat

Cheryl J. Wakslak, John Jost, Patrick Bauer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

System justification theory suggests that individuals defend and rationalize aspects of prevailing social systems, especially in response to system threat. In two experiments we extend this framework by demonstrating that people rationalize small-scale social systems (e.g., local popularity hierarchies and the nuclear family) as well as large-scale social systems (e.g., American society). Furthermore, we find that system threat leads people to bolster not only the legitimacy of the social system that is directly threatened but also the legitimacy of systems at other levels of analysis. These results provide evidence of spreading rationalization, suggesting that people respond defensively to other social systems when one system that they belong to is criticized or attacked.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)288-302
Number of pages15
JournalSocial Cognition
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Illegitimacy
Nuclear Family
Rationalization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Spreading rationalization : Increased support for large-scale and small-scale social systems following system threat. / Wakslak, Cheryl J.; Jost, John; Bauer, Patrick.

In: Social Cognition, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2011, p. 288-302.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{579fad8cf7a54032b65da4a418e5ef52,
title = "Spreading rationalization: Increased support for large-scale and small-scale social systems following system threat",
abstract = "System justification theory suggests that individuals defend and rationalize aspects of prevailing social systems, especially in response to system threat. In two experiments we extend this framework by demonstrating that people rationalize small-scale social systems (e.g., local popularity hierarchies and the nuclear family) as well as large-scale social systems (e.g., American society). Furthermore, we find that system threat leads people to bolster not only the legitimacy of the social system that is directly threatened but also the legitimacy of systems at other levels of analysis. These results provide evidence of spreading rationalization, suggesting that people respond defensively to other social systems when one system that they belong to is criticized or attacked.",
author = "Wakslak, {Cheryl J.} and John Jost and Patrick Bauer",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1521/soco.2011.29.3.288",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "288--302",
journal = "Social Cognition",
issn = "0278-016X",
publisher = "Guilford Publications",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spreading rationalization

T2 - Increased support for large-scale and small-scale social systems following system threat

AU - Wakslak, Cheryl J.

AU - Jost, John

AU - Bauer, Patrick

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - System justification theory suggests that individuals defend and rationalize aspects of prevailing social systems, especially in response to system threat. In two experiments we extend this framework by demonstrating that people rationalize small-scale social systems (e.g., local popularity hierarchies and the nuclear family) as well as large-scale social systems (e.g., American society). Furthermore, we find that system threat leads people to bolster not only the legitimacy of the social system that is directly threatened but also the legitimacy of systems at other levels of analysis. These results provide evidence of spreading rationalization, suggesting that people respond defensively to other social systems when one system that they belong to is criticized or attacked.

AB - System justification theory suggests that individuals defend and rationalize aspects of prevailing social systems, especially in response to system threat. In two experiments we extend this framework by demonstrating that people rationalize small-scale social systems (e.g., local popularity hierarchies and the nuclear family) as well as large-scale social systems (e.g., American society). Furthermore, we find that system threat leads people to bolster not only the legitimacy of the social system that is directly threatened but also the legitimacy of systems at other levels of analysis. These results provide evidence of spreading rationalization, suggesting that people respond defensively to other social systems when one system that they belong to is criticized or attacked.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959930142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959930142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1521/soco.2011.29.3.288

DO - 10.1521/soco.2011.29.3.288

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 288

EP - 302

JO - Social Cognition

JF - Social Cognition

SN - 0278-016X

IS - 3

ER -