Sport-for-development

A level playing field?

Janet Njelesani, Barbara E. Gibson, Debra Cameron, Stephanie Nixon, Helene Polatajko

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the burgeoning field of sport-for-development, the benefits of participation for youths have been widely discussed. However, it has also been noted that some youth are excluded based on ability, location, economic means, and gender and are thus not participating. We considered that this might be an issue of ideologies. Thus, it was the purpose of this study to use a critical occupational approach to explore how sport-for-development ideologies in Zambia shape the participation of young people. Drawing on empirical data gathered from five case studies of sport-for-development organizations in Lusaka, Zambia, three themes were identified that describe ideological beliefs within the Zambian sport-for-development context. The first, sport benefits all, contributed to the practice of sport being used uncritically as an activity for all youth. The second, good people do, perpetuated what were considered acceptable activities that boys and girls could do in the local context. Finally, a belief that sport is the way out privileged boys who play football as well as athletic non-disabled boys in opposition to girls, poor youths, rural youths, and girls and boys with disabilities. Together these beliefs have contributed to successes (careers in sport) and shortcomings (occupational injustices) associated with the sport-for-development phenomenon.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number12
JournalForum Qualitative Sozialforschung
Volume16
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Sports
Zambia
Ideologies
participation
opposition
disability
career
gender
ability
economics

Keywords

  • Critical occupational approach
  • Occupation
  • Qualitative case study
  • Sport-for-development
  • Zambia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Njelesani, J., Gibson, B. E., Cameron, D., Nixon, S., & Polatajko, H. (2015). Sport-for-development: A level playing field? Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 16(2), [12].

Sport-for-development : A level playing field? / Njelesani, Janet; Gibson, Barbara E.; Cameron, Debra; Nixon, Stephanie; Polatajko, Helene.

In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, Vol. 16, No. 2, 12, 2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Njelesani, J, Gibson, BE, Cameron, D, Nixon, S & Polatajko, H 2015, 'Sport-for-development: A level playing field?', Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, vol. 16, no. 2, 12.
Njelesani J, Gibson BE, Cameron D, Nixon S, Polatajko H. Sport-for-development: A level playing field? Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung. 2015;16(2). 12.
Njelesani, Janet ; Gibson, Barbara E. ; Cameron, Debra ; Nixon, Stephanie ; Polatajko, Helene. / Sport-for-development : A level playing field?. In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung. 2015 ; Vol. 16, No. 2.
@article{ab279f4b9320460994f07dd69f31b42f,
title = "Sport-for-development: A level playing field?",
abstract = "In the burgeoning field of sport-for-development, the benefits of participation for youths have been widely discussed. However, it has also been noted that some youth are excluded based on ability, location, economic means, and gender and are thus not participating. We considered that this might be an issue of ideologies. Thus, it was the purpose of this study to use a critical occupational approach to explore how sport-for-development ideologies in Zambia shape the participation of young people. Drawing on empirical data gathered from five case studies of sport-for-development organizations in Lusaka, Zambia, three themes were identified that describe ideological beliefs within the Zambian sport-for-development context. The first, sport benefits all, contributed to the practice of sport being used uncritically as an activity for all youth. The second, good people do, perpetuated what were considered acceptable activities that boys and girls could do in the local context. Finally, a belief that sport is the way out privileged boys who play football as well as athletic non-disabled boys in opposition to girls, poor youths, rural youths, and girls and boys with disabilities. Together these beliefs have contributed to successes (careers in sport) and shortcomings (occupational injustices) associated with the sport-for-development phenomenon.",
keywords = "Critical occupational approach, Occupation, Qualitative case study, Sport-for-development, Zambia",
author = "Janet Njelesani and Gibson, {Barbara E.} and Debra Cameron and Stephanie Nixon and Helene Polatajko",
year = "2015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
journal = "Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung",
issn = "1438-5627",
publisher = "Institut fur Klinische Sychologie and Gemeindesychologie",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sport-for-development

T2 - A level playing field?

AU - Njelesani, Janet

AU - Gibson, Barbara E.

AU - Cameron, Debra

AU - Nixon, Stephanie

AU - Polatajko, Helene

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - In the burgeoning field of sport-for-development, the benefits of participation for youths have been widely discussed. However, it has also been noted that some youth are excluded based on ability, location, economic means, and gender and are thus not participating. We considered that this might be an issue of ideologies. Thus, it was the purpose of this study to use a critical occupational approach to explore how sport-for-development ideologies in Zambia shape the participation of young people. Drawing on empirical data gathered from five case studies of sport-for-development organizations in Lusaka, Zambia, three themes were identified that describe ideological beliefs within the Zambian sport-for-development context. The first, sport benefits all, contributed to the practice of sport being used uncritically as an activity for all youth. The second, good people do, perpetuated what were considered acceptable activities that boys and girls could do in the local context. Finally, a belief that sport is the way out privileged boys who play football as well as athletic non-disabled boys in opposition to girls, poor youths, rural youths, and girls and boys with disabilities. Together these beliefs have contributed to successes (careers in sport) and shortcomings (occupational injustices) associated with the sport-for-development phenomenon.

AB - In the burgeoning field of sport-for-development, the benefits of participation for youths have been widely discussed. However, it has also been noted that some youth are excluded based on ability, location, economic means, and gender and are thus not participating. We considered that this might be an issue of ideologies. Thus, it was the purpose of this study to use a critical occupational approach to explore how sport-for-development ideologies in Zambia shape the participation of young people. Drawing on empirical data gathered from five case studies of sport-for-development organizations in Lusaka, Zambia, three themes were identified that describe ideological beliefs within the Zambian sport-for-development context. The first, sport benefits all, contributed to the practice of sport being used uncritically as an activity for all youth. The second, good people do, perpetuated what were considered acceptable activities that boys and girls could do in the local context. Finally, a belief that sport is the way out privileged boys who play football as well as athletic non-disabled boys in opposition to girls, poor youths, rural youths, and girls and boys with disabilities. Together these beliefs have contributed to successes (careers in sport) and shortcomings (occupational injustices) associated with the sport-for-development phenomenon.

KW - Critical occupational approach

KW - Occupation

KW - Qualitative case study

KW - Sport-for-development

KW - Zambia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930664121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930664121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 16

JO - Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung

JF - Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung

SN - 1438-5627

IS - 2

M1 - 12

ER -