Speed and Accuracy on the Hearts and Flowers Task Interact to Predict Child Outcomes

Marie Camerota, Michael T. Willoughby, Clancy Blair

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The current study tests whether accuracy and reaction time (RT) on the Hearts and Flowers (HF) task, a common assessment tool used across wide age ranges, can be leveraged as joint indicators of child executive function (EF) ability. Although previous studies have tended to use accuracy or RT, either alone or as separate indicators, one open question is whether these 2 metrics can be yoked together to enhance our measurement of EF ability. We test this question using HF data collected from first-grade children who participated in the Family Life Project. Specifically, we model the independent and interactive effects of HF accuracy and RT on several criterion outcomes representing child academic and behavioral competence. Our findings indicate that among early-elementary-aged children, accuracy and RT interact in the prediction of child outcomes, with RT being a more informative index of EF ability for children who perform at high levels of accuracy. The main effect of accuracy remained significant in the presence of these interactive effects. This pattern of findings was similar for different task blocks (i.e., mixed, flower-only) and for different child outcome domains (i.e., academic, behavioral). Our finding of an interaction between accuracy and RT contributes to a growing literature that attempts to jointly consider accuracy and RT as indicators of underlying ability, which has important implications for how EF task scores are constructed and interpreted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPsychological Assessment
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Reaction Time
Aptitude
Executive Function
Mental Competency
Joints

Keywords

  • Accuracy
  • Executive function
  • RT
  • Task scoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Speed and Accuracy on the Hearts and Flowers Task Interact to Predict Child Outcomes. / Camerota, Marie; Willoughby, Michael T.; Blair, Clancy.

In: Psychological Assessment, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{19c226a4909c46b0885d174ac01713dd,
title = "Speed and Accuracy on the Hearts and Flowers Task Interact to Predict Child Outcomes",
abstract = "The current study tests whether accuracy and reaction time (RT) on the Hearts and Flowers (HF) task, a common assessment tool used across wide age ranges, can be leveraged as joint indicators of child executive function (EF) ability. Although previous studies have tended to use accuracy or RT, either alone or as separate indicators, one open question is whether these 2 metrics can be yoked together to enhance our measurement of EF ability. We test this question using HF data collected from first-grade children who participated in the Family Life Project. Specifically, we model the independent and interactive effects of HF accuracy and RT on several criterion outcomes representing child academic and behavioral competence. Our findings indicate that among early-elementary-aged children, accuracy and RT interact in the prediction of child outcomes, with RT being a more informative index of EF ability for children who perform at high levels of accuracy. The main effect of accuracy remained significant in the presence of these interactive effects. This pattern of findings was similar for different task blocks (i.e., mixed, flower-only) and for different child outcome domains (i.e., academic, behavioral). Our finding of an interaction between accuracy and RT contributes to a growing literature that attempts to jointly consider accuracy and RT as indicators of underlying ability, which has important implications for how EF task scores are constructed and interpreted.",
keywords = "Accuracy, Executive function, RT, Task scoring",
author = "Marie Camerota and Willoughby, {Michael T.} and Clancy Blair",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/pas0000725",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Psychological Assessment",
issn = "1040-3590",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Speed and Accuracy on the Hearts and Flowers Task Interact to Predict Child Outcomes

AU - Camerota, Marie

AU - Willoughby, Michael T.

AU - Blair, Clancy

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The current study tests whether accuracy and reaction time (RT) on the Hearts and Flowers (HF) task, a common assessment tool used across wide age ranges, can be leveraged as joint indicators of child executive function (EF) ability. Although previous studies have tended to use accuracy or RT, either alone or as separate indicators, one open question is whether these 2 metrics can be yoked together to enhance our measurement of EF ability. We test this question using HF data collected from first-grade children who participated in the Family Life Project. Specifically, we model the independent and interactive effects of HF accuracy and RT on several criterion outcomes representing child academic and behavioral competence. Our findings indicate that among early-elementary-aged children, accuracy and RT interact in the prediction of child outcomes, with RT being a more informative index of EF ability for children who perform at high levels of accuracy. The main effect of accuracy remained significant in the presence of these interactive effects. This pattern of findings was similar for different task blocks (i.e., mixed, flower-only) and for different child outcome domains (i.e., academic, behavioral). Our finding of an interaction between accuracy and RT contributes to a growing literature that attempts to jointly consider accuracy and RT as indicators of underlying ability, which has important implications for how EF task scores are constructed and interpreted.

AB - The current study tests whether accuracy and reaction time (RT) on the Hearts and Flowers (HF) task, a common assessment tool used across wide age ranges, can be leveraged as joint indicators of child executive function (EF) ability. Although previous studies have tended to use accuracy or RT, either alone or as separate indicators, one open question is whether these 2 metrics can be yoked together to enhance our measurement of EF ability. We test this question using HF data collected from first-grade children who participated in the Family Life Project. Specifically, we model the independent and interactive effects of HF accuracy and RT on several criterion outcomes representing child academic and behavioral competence. Our findings indicate that among early-elementary-aged children, accuracy and RT interact in the prediction of child outcomes, with RT being a more informative index of EF ability for children who perform at high levels of accuracy. The main effect of accuracy remained significant in the presence of these interactive effects. This pattern of findings was similar for different task blocks (i.e., mixed, flower-only) and for different child outcome domains (i.e., academic, behavioral). Our finding of an interaction between accuracy and RT contributes to a growing literature that attempts to jointly consider accuracy and RT as indicators of underlying ability, which has important implications for how EF task scores are constructed and interpreted.

KW - Accuracy

KW - Executive function

KW - RT

KW - Task scoring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064920538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064920538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/pas0000725

DO - 10.1037/pas0000725

M3 - Article

C2 - 31033313

AN - SCOPUS:85064920538

JO - Psychological Assessment

JF - Psychological Assessment

SN - 1040-3590

ER -