Spatial inequity and national territory: Remapping 1905 in Bengal and Assam

David Ludden

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Abstract

    In 1905, Viceroy Nathaniel Curzon applied well-worn principles of imperial order to reorganize northeastern regions of British India, bringing the entire Meghna-Brahmaputra river basin into one new administrative territory: the province of Eastern Bengal and Assam. He thereby launched modern territorial politics in South Asia by provoking an expansive and ultimately victorious nationalist agitation to unify Bengal and protect India's territorial integrity. This movement and its economic programme (swadeshi) expressed Indian nationalist opposition to imperial inequity. It established a permanent spatial frame for Indian national thought. It also expressed and naturalized spatial inequity inside India, which was increasing at the time under economic globalization. Spatial inequities in the political economy of uneven development have animated territorial politics in South Asia ever since. A century later, another acceleration of globalization is again increasing spatial inequity, again destabilizing territorial order, as nationalists naturalize spatial inequity in national territory and conflicts erupt from the experience of living in disadvantaged places. Remapping 1905 in the long twentieth century which connects these two periods of globalization, spanning eras of empire and nation, reveals spatial dynamics of modernity concealed by national maps and brings to light a transnational history of spatial inequity shared by Bangladesh and Northeast India.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)483-525
    Number of pages43
    JournalModern Asian Studies
    Volume46
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - May 2012

    Fingerprint

    globalization
    India
    politics
    South Asia
    uneven development
    modernity
    territorial integrity
    political economy
    economics
    twentieth century
    river basin
    Bangladesh
    opposition
    river
    history
    Bengal
    experience
    Asia
    Nationalists
    province

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Geography, Planning and Development
    • History
    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Spatial inequity and national territory : Remapping 1905 in Bengal and Assam. / Ludden, David.

    In: Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 46, No. 3, 05.2012, p. 483-525.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    @article{b394901b68914e84b165f4bf406d46bd,
    title = "Spatial inequity and national territory: Remapping 1905 in Bengal and Assam",
    abstract = "In 1905, Viceroy Nathaniel Curzon applied well-worn principles of imperial order to reorganize northeastern regions of British India, bringing the entire Meghna-Brahmaputra river basin into one new administrative territory: the province of Eastern Bengal and Assam. He thereby launched modern territorial politics in South Asia by provoking an expansive and ultimately victorious nationalist agitation to unify Bengal and protect India's territorial integrity. This movement and its economic programme (swadeshi) expressed Indian nationalist opposition to imperial inequity. It established a permanent spatial frame for Indian national thought. It also expressed and naturalized spatial inequity inside India, which was increasing at the time under economic globalization. Spatial inequities in the political economy of uneven development have animated territorial politics in South Asia ever since. A century later, another acceleration of globalization is again increasing spatial inequity, again destabilizing territorial order, as nationalists naturalize spatial inequity in national territory and conflicts erupt from the experience of living in disadvantaged places. Remapping 1905 in the long twentieth century which connects these two periods of globalization, spanning eras of empire and nation, reveals spatial dynamics of modernity concealed by national maps and brings to light a transnational history of spatial inequity shared by Bangladesh and Northeast India.",
    author = "David Ludden",
    year = "2012",
    month = "5",
    doi = "10.1017/S0026749X11000357",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "46",
    pages = "483--525",
    journal = "Modern Asian Studies",
    issn = "0026-749X",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Spatial inequity and national territory

    T2 - Remapping 1905 in Bengal and Assam

    AU - Ludden, David

    PY - 2012/5

    Y1 - 2012/5

    N2 - In 1905, Viceroy Nathaniel Curzon applied well-worn principles of imperial order to reorganize northeastern regions of British India, bringing the entire Meghna-Brahmaputra river basin into one new administrative territory: the province of Eastern Bengal and Assam. He thereby launched modern territorial politics in South Asia by provoking an expansive and ultimately victorious nationalist agitation to unify Bengal and protect India's territorial integrity. This movement and its economic programme (swadeshi) expressed Indian nationalist opposition to imperial inequity. It established a permanent spatial frame for Indian national thought. It also expressed and naturalized spatial inequity inside India, which was increasing at the time under economic globalization. Spatial inequities in the political economy of uneven development have animated territorial politics in South Asia ever since. A century later, another acceleration of globalization is again increasing spatial inequity, again destabilizing territorial order, as nationalists naturalize spatial inequity in national territory and conflicts erupt from the experience of living in disadvantaged places. Remapping 1905 in the long twentieth century which connects these two periods of globalization, spanning eras of empire and nation, reveals spatial dynamics of modernity concealed by national maps and brings to light a transnational history of spatial inequity shared by Bangladesh and Northeast India.

    AB - In 1905, Viceroy Nathaniel Curzon applied well-worn principles of imperial order to reorganize northeastern regions of British India, bringing the entire Meghna-Brahmaputra river basin into one new administrative territory: the province of Eastern Bengal and Assam. He thereby launched modern territorial politics in South Asia by provoking an expansive and ultimately victorious nationalist agitation to unify Bengal and protect India's territorial integrity. This movement and its economic programme (swadeshi) expressed Indian nationalist opposition to imperial inequity. It established a permanent spatial frame for Indian national thought. It also expressed and naturalized spatial inequity inside India, which was increasing at the time under economic globalization. Spatial inequities in the political economy of uneven development have animated territorial politics in South Asia ever since. A century later, another acceleration of globalization is again increasing spatial inequity, again destabilizing territorial order, as nationalists naturalize spatial inequity in national territory and conflicts erupt from the experience of living in disadvantaged places. Remapping 1905 in the long twentieth century which connects these two periods of globalization, spanning eras of empire and nation, reveals spatial dynamics of modernity concealed by national maps and brings to light a transnational history of spatial inequity shared by Bangladesh and Northeast India.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859548091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859548091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1017/S0026749X11000357

    DO - 10.1017/S0026749X11000357

    M3 - Review article

    VL - 46

    SP - 483

    EP - 525

    JO - Modern Asian Studies

    JF - Modern Asian Studies

    SN - 0026-749X

    IS - 3

    ER -