Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF

Support for signal enhancement

Marisa Carrasco, Cigdem Penpeci-Talgar, Miguel Eckstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study is the first to report the benefits of spatial covert attention on contrast sensitivity in a wide range of spatial frequencies when a target alone was presented in the absence of a local post-mask. We used a peripheral precue (a small circle indicating the target location) to explore the effects of covert spatial attention on contrast sensitivity as assessed by orientation discrimination (Experiments 1-4), detection (Experiments 2 and 3) and localization (Experiment 3) tasks. In all four experiments the target (a Gabor patch ranging in spatial frequency from 0.5 to 10 cpd) was presented alone in one of eight possible locations equidistant from fixation. Contrast sensitivity was consistently higher for peripherally- than for neutrally-cued trials, even though we eliminated variables (distracters, global masks, local masks, and location uncertainty) that are known to contribute to an external noise reduction explanation of attention. When observers were presented with vertical and horizontal Gabor patches an external noise reduction signal detection model accounted for the cueing benefit in a discrimination task (Experiment 1). However, such a model could not account for this benefit when location uncertainty was reduced, either by: (a) Increasing overall performance level (Experiment 2); (b) increasing stimulus contrast to enable fine discriminations of slightly tilted suprathreshold stimuli (Experiment 3); and (c) presenting a local post-mask (Experiment 4). Given that attentional benefits occurred under conditions that exclude all variables predicted by the external noise reduction model, these results support the signal enhancement model of attention. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1203-1215
Number of pages13
JournalVision Research
Volume40
Issue number10-12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2000

Fingerprint

Contrast Sensitivity
Masks
Noise
Uncertainty
Discrimination (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Attention mechanisms
  • Contrast sensitivity
  • Covert spatial attention
  • Detection
  • External noise reduction
  • Localization
  • Mask
  • Orientation discrimination
  • Peripheral precue
  • Signal enhancement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF : Support for signal enhancement. / Carrasco, Marisa; Penpeci-Talgar, Cigdem; Eckstein, Miguel.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 40, No. 10-12, 06.2000, p. 1203-1215.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Carrasco, Marisa ; Penpeci-Talgar, Cigdem ; Eckstein, Miguel. / Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF : Support for signal enhancement. In: Vision Research. 2000 ; Vol. 40, No. 10-12. pp. 1203-1215.
@article{8b7fe560ca41494394ac6b8f1fb63561,
title = "Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: Support for signal enhancement",
abstract = "This study is the first to report the benefits of spatial covert attention on contrast sensitivity in a wide range of spatial frequencies when a target alone was presented in the absence of a local post-mask. We used a peripheral precue (a small circle indicating the target location) to explore the effects of covert spatial attention on contrast sensitivity as assessed by orientation discrimination (Experiments 1-4), detection (Experiments 2 and 3) and localization (Experiment 3) tasks. In all four experiments the target (a Gabor patch ranging in spatial frequency from 0.5 to 10 cpd) was presented alone in one of eight possible locations equidistant from fixation. Contrast sensitivity was consistently higher for peripherally- than for neutrally-cued trials, even though we eliminated variables (distracters, global masks, local masks, and location uncertainty) that are known to contribute to an external noise reduction explanation of attention. When observers were presented with vertical and horizontal Gabor patches an external noise reduction signal detection model accounted for the cueing benefit in a discrimination task (Experiment 1). However, such a model could not account for this benefit when location uncertainty was reduced, either by: (a) Increasing overall performance level (Experiment 2); (b) increasing stimulus contrast to enable fine discriminations of slightly tilted suprathreshold stimuli (Experiment 3); and (c) presenting a local post-mask (Experiment 4). Given that attentional benefits occurred under conditions that exclude all variables predicted by the external noise reduction model, these results support the signal enhancement model of attention. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.",
keywords = "Attention mechanisms, Contrast sensitivity, Covert spatial attention, Detection, External noise reduction, Localization, Mask, Orientation discrimination, Peripheral precue, Signal enhancement",
author = "Marisa Carrasco and Cigdem Penpeci-Talgar and Miguel Eckstein",
year = "2000",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00024-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "1203--1215",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "10-12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF

T2 - Support for signal enhancement

AU - Carrasco, Marisa

AU - Penpeci-Talgar, Cigdem

AU - Eckstein, Miguel

PY - 2000/6

Y1 - 2000/6

N2 - This study is the first to report the benefits of spatial covert attention on contrast sensitivity in a wide range of spatial frequencies when a target alone was presented in the absence of a local post-mask. We used a peripheral precue (a small circle indicating the target location) to explore the effects of covert spatial attention on contrast sensitivity as assessed by orientation discrimination (Experiments 1-4), detection (Experiments 2 and 3) and localization (Experiment 3) tasks. In all four experiments the target (a Gabor patch ranging in spatial frequency from 0.5 to 10 cpd) was presented alone in one of eight possible locations equidistant from fixation. Contrast sensitivity was consistently higher for peripherally- than for neutrally-cued trials, even though we eliminated variables (distracters, global masks, local masks, and location uncertainty) that are known to contribute to an external noise reduction explanation of attention. When observers were presented with vertical and horizontal Gabor patches an external noise reduction signal detection model accounted for the cueing benefit in a discrimination task (Experiment 1). However, such a model could not account for this benefit when location uncertainty was reduced, either by: (a) Increasing overall performance level (Experiment 2); (b) increasing stimulus contrast to enable fine discriminations of slightly tilted suprathreshold stimuli (Experiment 3); and (c) presenting a local post-mask (Experiment 4). Given that attentional benefits occurred under conditions that exclude all variables predicted by the external noise reduction model, these results support the signal enhancement model of attention. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.

AB - This study is the first to report the benefits of spatial covert attention on contrast sensitivity in a wide range of spatial frequencies when a target alone was presented in the absence of a local post-mask. We used a peripheral precue (a small circle indicating the target location) to explore the effects of covert spatial attention on contrast sensitivity as assessed by orientation discrimination (Experiments 1-4), detection (Experiments 2 and 3) and localization (Experiment 3) tasks. In all four experiments the target (a Gabor patch ranging in spatial frequency from 0.5 to 10 cpd) was presented alone in one of eight possible locations equidistant from fixation. Contrast sensitivity was consistently higher for peripherally- than for neutrally-cued trials, even though we eliminated variables (distracters, global masks, local masks, and location uncertainty) that are known to contribute to an external noise reduction explanation of attention. When observers were presented with vertical and horizontal Gabor patches an external noise reduction signal detection model accounted for the cueing benefit in a discrimination task (Experiment 1). However, such a model could not account for this benefit when location uncertainty was reduced, either by: (a) Increasing overall performance level (Experiment 2); (b) increasing stimulus contrast to enable fine discriminations of slightly tilted suprathreshold stimuli (Experiment 3); and (c) presenting a local post-mask (Experiment 4). Given that attentional benefits occurred under conditions that exclude all variables predicted by the external noise reduction model, these results support the signal enhancement model of attention. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.

KW - Attention mechanisms

KW - Contrast sensitivity

KW - Covert spatial attention

KW - Detection

KW - External noise reduction

KW - Localization

KW - Mask

KW - Orientation discrimination

KW - Peripheral precue

KW - Signal enhancement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034004666&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034004666&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00024-9

DO - 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00024-9

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 1203

EP - 1215

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 10-12

ER -