Sovereignty disavowed: the Tupac Amaru revolution in the Atlantic world

Sinclair Thomson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    While the Andean insurrection of the early 1780s, most often associated with the Inka leader Tupac Amaru II, was the most powerful challenge to Spanish rule in colonial Latin America, it is generally ignored in the Atlantic historiography of the Age of Revolution. This article reviews the reasons for this neglect and traces the problem back to the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. It demonstrates for the first time that knowledge of the revolution in the Andes circulated widely throughout the Atlantic world in the early 1780s. It also provides evidence of a deep panic on the part of Spanish authorities, who feared that the anti-colonial revolution unfolding in British North America could find a counterpart in Spanish South America, especially with instigation by their British imperial rivals. It reveals Spanish attempts to prevent circulation of the news of the insurrection and the beginnings of a tradition that would reduce the meaning of the Andean revolution to an expression of race war. It argues more generally that this case of “silencing” (M. R. Trouillot) and “disavowal” (S. Fischer) in the Atlantic world reflected a repudiation of the radical principle of indigenous political sovereignty which underlay the Andean insurgencies. Rather than incorporate the Andean case into the existing paradigm of Atlantic revolutions, the article seeks to enrich the historiography of the Age of Revolution by showing that projects for indigenous territory and political authority, which challenged European and creole sovereignty in the Americas, deserve to be seen as integral to the epoch.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)407-431
    Number of pages25
    JournalAtlantic Studies: Literary, Cultural and Historical Perspectives
    Volume13
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jul 2 2016

    Fingerprint

    sovereignty
    historiography
    neglect
    Latin America
    nineteenth century
    news
    Revolution
    Sovereignty
    Atlantic World
    leader
    paradigm
    evidence
    Insurrection
    Historiography
    Colonies
    1780s

    Keywords

    • Atlantic
    • Bolivia
    • indigenous
    • memory
    • Peru
    • revolution
    • sovereignty
    • Tupac Amaru
    • Tupaj Katari

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Cultural Studies
    • History
    • Literature and Literary Theory

    Cite this

    Sovereignty disavowed : the Tupac Amaru revolution in the Atlantic world. / Thomson, Sinclair.

    In: Atlantic Studies: Literary, Cultural and Historical Perspectives, Vol. 13, No. 3, 02.07.2016, p. 407-431.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{27d1140c56ba43f985df0893c0bf191c,
    title = "Sovereignty disavowed: the Tupac Amaru revolution in the Atlantic world",
    abstract = "While the Andean insurrection of the early 1780s, most often associated with the Inka leader Tupac Amaru II, was the most powerful challenge to Spanish rule in colonial Latin America, it is generally ignored in the Atlantic historiography of the Age of Revolution. This article reviews the reasons for this neglect and traces the problem back to the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. It demonstrates for the first time that knowledge of the revolution in the Andes circulated widely throughout the Atlantic world in the early 1780s. It also provides evidence of a deep panic on the part of Spanish authorities, who feared that the anti-colonial revolution unfolding in British North America could find a counterpart in Spanish South America, especially with instigation by their British imperial rivals. It reveals Spanish attempts to prevent circulation of the news of the insurrection and the beginnings of a tradition that would reduce the meaning of the Andean revolution to an expression of race war. It argues more generally that this case of “silencing” (M. R. Trouillot) and “disavowal” (S. Fischer) in the Atlantic world reflected a repudiation of the radical principle of indigenous political sovereignty which underlay the Andean insurgencies. Rather than incorporate the Andean case into the existing paradigm of Atlantic revolutions, the article seeks to enrich the historiography of the Age of Revolution by showing that projects for indigenous territory and political authority, which challenged European and creole sovereignty in the Americas, deserve to be seen as integral to the epoch.",
    keywords = "Atlantic, Bolivia, indigenous, memory, Peru, revolution, sovereignty, Tupac Amaru, Tupaj Katari",
    author = "Sinclair Thomson",
    year = "2016",
    month = "7",
    day = "2",
    doi = "10.1080/14788810.2016.1181537",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "13",
    pages = "407--431",
    journal = "Atlantic Studies : Global Currents",
    issn = "1478-8810",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Sovereignty disavowed

    T2 - the Tupac Amaru revolution in the Atlantic world

    AU - Thomson, Sinclair

    PY - 2016/7/2

    Y1 - 2016/7/2

    N2 - While the Andean insurrection of the early 1780s, most often associated with the Inka leader Tupac Amaru II, was the most powerful challenge to Spanish rule in colonial Latin America, it is generally ignored in the Atlantic historiography of the Age of Revolution. This article reviews the reasons for this neglect and traces the problem back to the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. It demonstrates for the first time that knowledge of the revolution in the Andes circulated widely throughout the Atlantic world in the early 1780s. It also provides evidence of a deep panic on the part of Spanish authorities, who feared that the anti-colonial revolution unfolding in British North America could find a counterpart in Spanish South America, especially with instigation by their British imperial rivals. It reveals Spanish attempts to prevent circulation of the news of the insurrection and the beginnings of a tradition that would reduce the meaning of the Andean revolution to an expression of race war. It argues more generally that this case of “silencing” (M. R. Trouillot) and “disavowal” (S. Fischer) in the Atlantic world reflected a repudiation of the radical principle of indigenous political sovereignty which underlay the Andean insurgencies. Rather than incorporate the Andean case into the existing paradigm of Atlantic revolutions, the article seeks to enrich the historiography of the Age of Revolution by showing that projects for indigenous territory and political authority, which challenged European and creole sovereignty in the Americas, deserve to be seen as integral to the epoch.

    AB - While the Andean insurrection of the early 1780s, most often associated with the Inka leader Tupac Amaru II, was the most powerful challenge to Spanish rule in colonial Latin America, it is generally ignored in the Atlantic historiography of the Age of Revolution. This article reviews the reasons for this neglect and traces the problem back to the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. It demonstrates for the first time that knowledge of the revolution in the Andes circulated widely throughout the Atlantic world in the early 1780s. It also provides evidence of a deep panic on the part of Spanish authorities, who feared that the anti-colonial revolution unfolding in British North America could find a counterpart in Spanish South America, especially with instigation by their British imperial rivals. It reveals Spanish attempts to prevent circulation of the news of the insurrection and the beginnings of a tradition that would reduce the meaning of the Andean revolution to an expression of race war. It argues more generally that this case of “silencing” (M. R. Trouillot) and “disavowal” (S. Fischer) in the Atlantic world reflected a repudiation of the radical principle of indigenous political sovereignty which underlay the Andean insurgencies. Rather than incorporate the Andean case into the existing paradigm of Atlantic revolutions, the article seeks to enrich the historiography of the Age of Revolution by showing that projects for indigenous territory and political authority, which challenged European and creole sovereignty in the Americas, deserve to be seen as integral to the epoch.

    KW - Atlantic

    KW - Bolivia

    KW - indigenous

    KW - memory

    KW - Peru

    KW - revolution

    KW - sovereignty

    KW - Tupac Amaru

    KW - Tupaj Katari

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977639610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84977639610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1080/14788810.2016.1181537

    DO - 10.1080/14788810.2016.1181537

    M3 - Article

    VL - 13

    SP - 407

    EP - 431

    JO - Atlantic Studies : Global Currents

    JF - Atlantic Studies : Global Currents

    SN - 1478-8810

    IS - 3

    ER -