Sometimes the Social Becomes Personal

Gender, Class, and Sexualities

Paula England

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    All sociologists recognize that social constraints affect individuals’ outcomes. These effects are sometimes relatively direct. Other times constraints affect outcomes indirectly, first influencing individuals’ personal characteristics, which then affect their outcomes. In the latter case, the social becomes personal, and personal characteristics that are carried across situations (e.g., skills, habits, identities, worldviews, preferences, or values) affect individuals’ outcomes. I argue here for the importance of both direct and indirect effects of constraints on outcomes. I disagree with the tendency among sociologists to avoid views highlighting the role of personal characteristics because of the perception—incorrect in my view—that these explanations “blame the victim” and ignore constraints. To illustrate the importance of both types of mechanisms, I explore two empirical cases involving how gender and class structure sexualities. First, I show that young men engage in same-sex relations less than women and have more heterosexist attitudes, and I ask why. Second, I provide evidence that people from disadvantaged class backgrounds are especially likely to have unintended pregnancies and nonmarital births, and I explore why. In each case, I provide evidence that both kinds of mechanisms are operating—mechanisms entailing direct effects of constraints on outcomes, and mechanisms in which constraints shape personal characteristics, which, in turn, affect outcomes.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)4-28
    Number of pages25
    JournalAmerican Sociological Review
    Volume81
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

    Fingerprint

    sexuality
    gender
    sociologist
    worldview
    evidence
    habits
    pregnancy
    Values

    Keywords

    • class
    • gender
    • sexualities

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Sometimes the Social Becomes Personal : Gender, Class, and Sexualities. / England, Paula.

    In: American Sociological Review, Vol. 81, No. 1, 01.02.2016, p. 4-28.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{cfb98fbf9c2147e28042c8115ffc21ae,
    title = "Sometimes the Social Becomes Personal: Gender, Class, and Sexualities",
    abstract = "All sociologists recognize that social constraints affect individuals’ outcomes. These effects are sometimes relatively direct. Other times constraints affect outcomes indirectly, first influencing individuals’ personal characteristics, which then affect their outcomes. In the latter case, the social becomes personal, and personal characteristics that are carried across situations (e.g., skills, habits, identities, worldviews, preferences, or values) affect individuals’ outcomes. I argue here for the importance of both direct and indirect effects of constraints on outcomes. I disagree with the tendency among sociologists to avoid views highlighting the role of personal characteristics because of the perception—incorrect in my view—that these explanations “blame the victim” and ignore constraints. To illustrate the importance of both types of mechanisms, I explore two empirical cases involving how gender and class structure sexualities. First, I show that young men engage in same-sex relations less than women and have more heterosexist attitudes, and I ask why. Second, I provide evidence that people from disadvantaged class backgrounds are especially likely to have unintended pregnancies and nonmarital births, and I explore why. In each case, I provide evidence that both kinds of mechanisms are operating—mechanisms entailing direct effects of constraints on outcomes, and mechanisms in which constraints shape personal characteristics, which, in turn, affect outcomes.",
    keywords = "class, gender, sexualities",
    author = "Paula England",
    year = "2016",
    month = "2",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1177/0003122415621900",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "81",
    pages = "4--28",
    journal = "American Sociological Review",
    issn = "0003-1224",
    publisher = "American Sociological Association",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Sometimes the Social Becomes Personal

    T2 - Gender, Class, and Sexualities

    AU - England, Paula

    PY - 2016/2/1

    Y1 - 2016/2/1

    N2 - All sociologists recognize that social constraints affect individuals’ outcomes. These effects are sometimes relatively direct. Other times constraints affect outcomes indirectly, first influencing individuals’ personal characteristics, which then affect their outcomes. In the latter case, the social becomes personal, and personal characteristics that are carried across situations (e.g., skills, habits, identities, worldviews, preferences, or values) affect individuals’ outcomes. I argue here for the importance of both direct and indirect effects of constraints on outcomes. I disagree with the tendency among sociologists to avoid views highlighting the role of personal characteristics because of the perception—incorrect in my view—that these explanations “blame the victim” and ignore constraints. To illustrate the importance of both types of mechanisms, I explore two empirical cases involving how gender and class structure sexualities. First, I show that young men engage in same-sex relations less than women and have more heterosexist attitudes, and I ask why. Second, I provide evidence that people from disadvantaged class backgrounds are especially likely to have unintended pregnancies and nonmarital births, and I explore why. In each case, I provide evidence that both kinds of mechanisms are operating—mechanisms entailing direct effects of constraints on outcomes, and mechanisms in which constraints shape personal characteristics, which, in turn, affect outcomes.

    AB - All sociologists recognize that social constraints affect individuals’ outcomes. These effects are sometimes relatively direct. Other times constraints affect outcomes indirectly, first influencing individuals’ personal characteristics, which then affect their outcomes. In the latter case, the social becomes personal, and personal characteristics that are carried across situations (e.g., skills, habits, identities, worldviews, preferences, or values) affect individuals’ outcomes. I argue here for the importance of both direct and indirect effects of constraints on outcomes. I disagree with the tendency among sociologists to avoid views highlighting the role of personal characteristics because of the perception—incorrect in my view—that these explanations “blame the victim” and ignore constraints. To illustrate the importance of both types of mechanisms, I explore two empirical cases involving how gender and class structure sexualities. First, I show that young men engage in same-sex relations less than women and have more heterosexist attitudes, and I ask why. Second, I provide evidence that people from disadvantaged class backgrounds are especially likely to have unintended pregnancies and nonmarital births, and I explore why. In each case, I provide evidence that both kinds of mechanisms are operating—mechanisms entailing direct effects of constraints on outcomes, and mechanisms in which constraints shape personal characteristics, which, in turn, affect outcomes.

    KW - class

    KW - gender

    KW - sexualities

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961377132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961377132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/0003122415621900

    DO - 10.1177/0003122415621900

    M3 - Article

    VL - 81

    SP - 4

    EP - 28

    JO - American Sociological Review

    JF - American Sociological Review

    SN - 0003-1224

    IS - 1

    ER -