Soft drink 'pouring rights'

Marketing empty calories to children

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Healthy People 2010 objectives call for meals and snacks served in schools to contribute to overall diets that meet federal dietary guidelines. Sales in schools of foods and drinks high in calories and low in nutrients undermine this health objective, as well as participation in the more nutritious, federally sponsored, school lunch programs. Competitive foods also undermine nutrition information taught in the classroom. Lucrative contracts between school districts and soft drink companies for exclusive rights to sell one brand are the latest development in the increasing commercialization of school food. These contracts, intended to elicit brand loyalty among young children who have a lifetime of purchases ahead of them, are especially questionable because they place schools in the position of 'pushing' soft drink consumption. 'Pouring rights' contracts deserve attention from public health professionals concerned about the nutritional quality of children's diets.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)308-319
Number of pages12
JournalPublic Health Reports
Volume115
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Carbonated Beverages
Marketing
Food
Contracts
Healthy People Programs
Diet
Nutrition Policy
Lunch
Snacks
Nutritive Value
Meals
Public Health
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Soft drink 'pouring rights' : Marketing empty calories to children. / Nestle, Marion.

In: Public Health Reports, Vol. 115, No. 4, 2000, p. 308-319.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c9d72abe186745a0a49e8bc8270751ef,
title = "Soft drink 'pouring rights': Marketing empty calories to children",
abstract = "Healthy People 2010 objectives call for meals and snacks served in schools to contribute to overall diets that meet federal dietary guidelines. Sales in schools of foods and drinks high in calories and low in nutrients undermine this health objective, as well as participation in the more nutritious, federally sponsored, school lunch programs. Competitive foods also undermine nutrition information taught in the classroom. Lucrative contracts between school districts and soft drink companies for exclusive rights to sell one brand are the latest development in the increasing commercialization of school food. These contracts, intended to elicit brand loyalty among young children who have a lifetime of purchases ahead of them, are especially questionable because they place schools in the position of 'pushing' soft drink consumption. 'Pouring rights' contracts deserve attention from public health professionals concerned about the nutritional quality of children's diets.",
author = "Marion Nestle",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "115",
pages = "308--319",
journal = "Public Health Reports",
issn = "0033-3549",
publisher = "Association of Schools of Public Health",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Soft drink 'pouring rights'

T2 - Marketing empty calories to children

AU - Nestle, Marion

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Healthy People 2010 objectives call for meals and snacks served in schools to contribute to overall diets that meet federal dietary guidelines. Sales in schools of foods and drinks high in calories and low in nutrients undermine this health objective, as well as participation in the more nutritious, federally sponsored, school lunch programs. Competitive foods also undermine nutrition information taught in the classroom. Lucrative contracts between school districts and soft drink companies for exclusive rights to sell one brand are the latest development in the increasing commercialization of school food. These contracts, intended to elicit brand loyalty among young children who have a lifetime of purchases ahead of them, are especially questionable because they place schools in the position of 'pushing' soft drink consumption. 'Pouring rights' contracts deserve attention from public health professionals concerned about the nutritional quality of children's diets.

AB - Healthy People 2010 objectives call for meals and snacks served in schools to contribute to overall diets that meet federal dietary guidelines. Sales in schools of foods and drinks high in calories and low in nutrients undermine this health objective, as well as participation in the more nutritious, federally sponsored, school lunch programs. Competitive foods also undermine nutrition information taught in the classroom. Lucrative contracts between school districts and soft drink companies for exclusive rights to sell one brand are the latest development in the increasing commercialization of school food. These contracts, intended to elicit brand loyalty among young children who have a lifetime of purchases ahead of them, are especially questionable because they place schools in the position of 'pushing' soft drink consumption. 'Pouring rights' contracts deserve attention from public health professionals concerned about the nutritional quality of children's diets.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033779483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033779483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 115

SP - 308

EP - 319

JO - Public Health Reports

JF - Public Health Reports

SN - 0033-3549

IS - 4

ER -