Socioeconomic status, energy cost, and nutrient content of supermarket food purchases

Bradley M. Appelhans, Brandy Joe Milliron, Kathleen Woolf, Tricia J. Johnson, Sherry L. Pagoto, Kristin L. Schneider, Matthew C. Whited, Jennifer C. Ventrelle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The relative affordability of energy-dense versus nutrient-rich foods may promote socioeconomic disparities in dietary quality and obesity. Although supermarkets are the largest food source in the American diet, the associations between SES and the cost and nutrient content of freely chosen food purchases have not been described. Purpose: To investigate relationships of SES with the energy cost ($/1000 kcal) and nutrient content of freely chosen supermarket purchases. Methods: Supermarket shoppers (n=69) were recruited at a Phoenix AZ supermarket in 2009. The energy cost and nutrient content of participants' purchases were calculated from photographs of food packaging and nutrition labels using dietary analysis software. Data were analyzed in 2010-2011. Results: Two SES indicators, education and household income as a percentage of the federal poverty guideline (FPG), were associated with the energy cost of purchased foods. Adjusting for covariates, the amount spent on 1000 kcal of food was $0.26 greater for every multiple of the FPG, and those with a baccalaureate or postbaccalaureate degree spent an additional $1.05 for every 1000 kcal of food compared to those with no college education. Lower energy cost was associated with higher total fat and less protein, dietary fiber, and vegetables per 1000 kcal purchased. Conclusions: Low-SES supermarket shoppers purchase calories in inexpensive forms that are higher in fat and less nutrient-rich.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)398-402
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume42
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Social Class
Costs and Cost Analysis
Food
Poverty
Fats
Vegetable Proteins
Guidelines
Food Packaging
Education
Dietary Fiber
Software
Obesity
Diet

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Appelhans, B. M., Milliron, B. J., Woolf, K., Johnson, T. J., Pagoto, S. L., Schneider, K. L., ... Ventrelle, J. C. (2012). Socioeconomic status, energy cost, and nutrient content of supermarket food purchases. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 42(4), 398-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.12.007

Socioeconomic status, energy cost, and nutrient content of supermarket food purchases. / Appelhans, Bradley M.; Milliron, Brandy Joe; Woolf, Kathleen; Johnson, Tricia J.; Pagoto, Sherry L.; Schneider, Kristin L.; Whited, Matthew C.; Ventrelle, Jennifer C.

In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 42, No. 4, 04.2012, p. 398-402.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Appelhans, BM, Milliron, BJ, Woolf, K, Johnson, TJ, Pagoto, SL, Schneider, KL, Whited, MC & Ventrelle, JC 2012, 'Socioeconomic status, energy cost, and nutrient content of supermarket food purchases', American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 398-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.12.007
Appelhans, Bradley M. ; Milliron, Brandy Joe ; Woolf, Kathleen ; Johnson, Tricia J. ; Pagoto, Sherry L. ; Schneider, Kristin L. ; Whited, Matthew C. ; Ventrelle, Jennifer C. / Socioeconomic status, energy cost, and nutrient content of supermarket food purchases. In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 42, No. 4. pp. 398-402.
@article{036c413dbfd94f219ec3606c71a3713a,
title = "Socioeconomic status, energy cost, and nutrient content of supermarket food purchases",
abstract = "Background: The relative affordability of energy-dense versus nutrient-rich foods may promote socioeconomic disparities in dietary quality and obesity. Although supermarkets are the largest food source in the American diet, the associations between SES and the cost and nutrient content of freely chosen food purchases have not been described. Purpose: To investigate relationships of SES with the energy cost ($/1000 kcal) and nutrient content of freely chosen supermarket purchases. Methods: Supermarket shoppers (n=69) were recruited at a Phoenix AZ supermarket in 2009. The energy cost and nutrient content of participants' purchases were calculated from photographs of food packaging and nutrition labels using dietary analysis software. Data were analyzed in 2010-2011. Results: Two SES indicators, education and household income as a percentage of the federal poverty guideline (FPG), were associated with the energy cost of purchased foods. Adjusting for covariates, the amount spent on 1000 kcal of food was $0.26 greater for every multiple of the FPG, and those with a baccalaureate or postbaccalaureate degree spent an additional $1.05 for every 1000 kcal of food compared to those with no college education. Lower energy cost was associated with higher total fat and less protein, dietary fiber, and vegetables per 1000 kcal purchased. Conclusions: Low-SES supermarket shoppers purchase calories in inexpensive forms that are higher in fat and less nutrient-rich.",
author = "Appelhans, {Bradley M.} and Milliron, {Brandy Joe} and Kathleen Woolf and Johnson, {Tricia J.} and Pagoto, {Sherry L.} and Schneider, {Kristin L.} and Whited, {Matthew C.} and Ventrelle, {Jennifer C.}",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.amepre.2011.12.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "398--402",
journal = "American Journal of Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0749-3797",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Socioeconomic status, energy cost, and nutrient content of supermarket food purchases

AU - Appelhans, Bradley M.

AU - Milliron, Brandy Joe

AU - Woolf, Kathleen

AU - Johnson, Tricia J.

AU - Pagoto, Sherry L.

AU - Schneider, Kristin L.

AU - Whited, Matthew C.

AU - Ventrelle, Jennifer C.

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - Background: The relative affordability of energy-dense versus nutrient-rich foods may promote socioeconomic disparities in dietary quality and obesity. Although supermarkets are the largest food source in the American diet, the associations between SES and the cost and nutrient content of freely chosen food purchases have not been described. Purpose: To investigate relationships of SES with the energy cost ($/1000 kcal) and nutrient content of freely chosen supermarket purchases. Methods: Supermarket shoppers (n=69) were recruited at a Phoenix AZ supermarket in 2009. The energy cost and nutrient content of participants' purchases were calculated from photographs of food packaging and nutrition labels using dietary analysis software. Data were analyzed in 2010-2011. Results: Two SES indicators, education and household income as a percentage of the federal poverty guideline (FPG), were associated with the energy cost of purchased foods. Adjusting for covariates, the amount spent on 1000 kcal of food was $0.26 greater for every multiple of the FPG, and those with a baccalaureate or postbaccalaureate degree spent an additional $1.05 for every 1000 kcal of food compared to those with no college education. Lower energy cost was associated with higher total fat and less protein, dietary fiber, and vegetables per 1000 kcal purchased. Conclusions: Low-SES supermarket shoppers purchase calories in inexpensive forms that are higher in fat and less nutrient-rich.

AB - Background: The relative affordability of energy-dense versus nutrient-rich foods may promote socioeconomic disparities in dietary quality and obesity. Although supermarkets are the largest food source in the American diet, the associations between SES and the cost and nutrient content of freely chosen food purchases have not been described. Purpose: To investigate relationships of SES with the energy cost ($/1000 kcal) and nutrient content of freely chosen supermarket purchases. Methods: Supermarket shoppers (n=69) were recruited at a Phoenix AZ supermarket in 2009. The energy cost and nutrient content of participants' purchases were calculated from photographs of food packaging and nutrition labels using dietary analysis software. Data were analyzed in 2010-2011. Results: Two SES indicators, education and household income as a percentage of the federal poverty guideline (FPG), were associated with the energy cost of purchased foods. Adjusting for covariates, the amount spent on 1000 kcal of food was $0.26 greater for every multiple of the FPG, and those with a baccalaureate or postbaccalaureate degree spent an additional $1.05 for every 1000 kcal of food compared to those with no college education. Lower energy cost was associated with higher total fat and less protein, dietary fiber, and vegetables per 1000 kcal purchased. Conclusions: Low-SES supermarket shoppers purchase calories in inexpensive forms that are higher in fat and less nutrient-rich.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858636095&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858636095&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.12.007

DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.12.007

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 398

EP - 402

JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

SN - 0749-3797

IS - 4

ER -