Socially embedded consumer transactions: for what kinds of purchases do people most often use networks?

Paul Dimaggio, Hugh Louch

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Why and to what extent do people make significant purchases from people with whom they have prior noncommercial relationships? Using data from the economic sociology module of the 1996 General Social Survey, we document high levels of within-network exchanges. We argue that transacting with social contacts is effective because it embeds commercial exchanges in a web of obligations and holds the seller's network hostage to appropriate role performance in the economic transaction. It follows that within-network exchanges will be more common in risky transactions that are unlikely to be repeated and in which uncertainty is high. The data support this view. Self-reports about major purchases are consistent with the expectation that exchange frequency reduces the extent of within-network exchanges. Responses to questions about preferences for in-group exchanges support the argument that uncertainty about product and performance quality leads people to prefer sellers with whom they have noncommercial ties. Moreover, people prefer to avoid selling to social contacts under the same conditions that lead buyers to seek such transactions; and people who transact with friends and relatives report greater satisfaction with the results than do people who transact with strangers, especially for risk-laden exchanges.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)619-637
    Number of pages19
    JournalAmerican Sociological Review
    Volume63
    Issue number5
    StatePublished - 1998

    Fingerprint

    transaction
    purchase
    social relations
    uncertainty
    economic sociology
    selling
    performance
    obligation
    economics
    Group

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Socially embedded consumer transactions : for what kinds of purchases do people most often use networks? / Dimaggio, Paul; Louch, Hugh.

    In: American Sociological Review, Vol. 63, No. 5, 1998, p. 619-637.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{e7ae537e5b8b44458accee3462ce6cfb,
    title = "Socially embedded consumer transactions: for what kinds of purchases do people most often use networks?",
    abstract = "Why and to what extent do people make significant purchases from people with whom they have prior noncommercial relationships? Using data from the economic sociology module of the 1996 General Social Survey, we document high levels of within-network exchanges. We argue that transacting with social contacts is effective because it embeds commercial exchanges in a web of obligations and holds the seller's network hostage to appropriate role performance in the economic transaction. It follows that within-network exchanges will be more common in risky transactions that are unlikely to be repeated and in which uncertainty is high. The data support this view. Self-reports about major purchases are consistent with the expectation that exchange frequency reduces the extent of within-network exchanges. Responses to questions about preferences for in-group exchanges support the argument that uncertainty about product and performance quality leads people to prefer sellers with whom they have noncommercial ties. Moreover, people prefer to avoid selling to social contacts under the same conditions that lead buyers to seek such transactions; and people who transact with friends and relatives report greater satisfaction with the results than do people who transact with strangers, especially for risk-laden exchanges.",
    author = "Paul Dimaggio and Hugh Louch",
    year = "1998",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "63",
    pages = "619--637",
    journal = "American Sociological Review",
    issn = "0003-1224",
    publisher = "American Sociological Association",
    number = "5",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Socially embedded consumer transactions

    T2 - for what kinds of purchases do people most often use networks?

    AU - Dimaggio, Paul

    AU - Louch, Hugh

    PY - 1998

    Y1 - 1998

    N2 - Why and to what extent do people make significant purchases from people with whom they have prior noncommercial relationships? Using data from the economic sociology module of the 1996 General Social Survey, we document high levels of within-network exchanges. We argue that transacting with social contacts is effective because it embeds commercial exchanges in a web of obligations and holds the seller's network hostage to appropriate role performance in the economic transaction. It follows that within-network exchanges will be more common in risky transactions that are unlikely to be repeated and in which uncertainty is high. The data support this view. Self-reports about major purchases are consistent with the expectation that exchange frequency reduces the extent of within-network exchanges. Responses to questions about preferences for in-group exchanges support the argument that uncertainty about product and performance quality leads people to prefer sellers with whom they have noncommercial ties. Moreover, people prefer to avoid selling to social contacts under the same conditions that lead buyers to seek such transactions; and people who transact with friends and relatives report greater satisfaction with the results than do people who transact with strangers, especially for risk-laden exchanges.

    AB - Why and to what extent do people make significant purchases from people with whom they have prior noncommercial relationships? Using data from the economic sociology module of the 1996 General Social Survey, we document high levels of within-network exchanges. We argue that transacting with social contacts is effective because it embeds commercial exchanges in a web of obligations and holds the seller's network hostage to appropriate role performance in the economic transaction. It follows that within-network exchanges will be more common in risky transactions that are unlikely to be repeated and in which uncertainty is high. The data support this view. Self-reports about major purchases are consistent with the expectation that exchange frequency reduces the extent of within-network exchanges. Responses to questions about preferences for in-group exchanges support the argument that uncertainty about product and performance quality leads people to prefer sellers with whom they have noncommercial ties. Moreover, people prefer to avoid selling to social contacts under the same conditions that lead buyers to seek such transactions; and people who transact with friends and relatives report greater satisfaction with the results than do people who transact with strangers, especially for risk-laden exchanges.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031743966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031743966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    VL - 63

    SP - 619

    EP - 637

    JO - American Sociological Review

    JF - American Sociological Review

    SN - 0003-1224

    IS - 5

    ER -