SOCIALLY DESIRABLE REPORTING and the EXPRESSION of BIOLOGICAL CONCEPTS of RACE

Ann Morning, Hannah Brückner, Alondra Nelson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In recent decades, dramatic developments in genetics research have begun to transform not only the practice of medicine but also conceptions of the social world. In the media, in popular culture, and in everyday conversation, Americans routinely link genetics to individual behavior and social outcomes. At the same time, some social researchers contend that biological definitions of race have lost ground in the United States over the last fifty years. At the crossroads of two trends - on one hand, the post-World War II recoil from biological accounts of racial difference, and on the other, the growing admiration for the advances of genetic science - the American public's conception of race is a phenomenon that merits greater attention from sociologists than it has received to date. However, survey data on racial attitudes has proven to be significantly affected by social desirability bias. While a number of studies have attempted to measure social desirability bias with regard to racial attitudes, most have focused on racial policy preferences rather than genetic accounts of racial inequality. We employ a list experiment to create an unobtrusive measure of support for a biologistic understanding of racial inequality. We show that one in five non-Black Americans attribute income inequality between Black and White people to unspecified genetic differences between the two groups. We also find that this number is substantially underestimated when using a direct question. The magnitude of social desirability effects varies, and is most pronounced among women, older people, and the highly-educated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalDu Bois Review
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

social desirability
trend
racial policy
genetic research
popular culture
sociologist
World War II
conversation
medicine
income
experiment
science
Group

Keywords

  • Conceptualization
  • Genetics
  • Race
  • Social Desirability
  • Survey Experiments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • Anthropology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

SOCIALLY DESIRABLE REPORTING and the EXPRESSION of BIOLOGICAL CONCEPTS of RACE. / Morning, Ann; Brückner, Hannah; Nelson, Alondra.

In: Du Bois Review, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ae296861005545e4b4b153e872e8ae98,
title = "SOCIALLY DESIRABLE REPORTING and the EXPRESSION of BIOLOGICAL CONCEPTS of RACE",
abstract = "In recent decades, dramatic developments in genetics research have begun to transform not only the practice of medicine but also conceptions of the social world. In the media, in popular culture, and in everyday conversation, Americans routinely link genetics to individual behavior and social outcomes. At the same time, some social researchers contend that biological definitions of race have lost ground in the United States over the last fifty years. At the crossroads of two trends - on one hand, the post-World War II recoil from biological accounts of racial difference, and on the other, the growing admiration for the advances of genetic science - the American public's conception of race is a phenomenon that merits greater attention from sociologists than it has received to date. However, survey data on racial attitudes has proven to be significantly affected by social desirability bias. While a number of studies have attempted to measure social desirability bias with regard to racial attitudes, most have focused on racial policy preferences rather than genetic accounts of racial inequality. We employ a list experiment to create an unobtrusive measure of support for a biologistic understanding of racial inequality. We show that one in five non-Black Americans attribute income inequality between Black and White people to unspecified genetic differences between the two groups. We also find that this number is substantially underestimated when using a direct question. The magnitude of social desirability effects varies, and is most pronounced among women, older people, and the highly-educated.",
keywords = "Conceptualization, Genetics, Race, Social Desirability, Survey Experiments",
author = "Ann Morning and Hannah Br{\"u}ckner and Alondra Nelson",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1742058X19000195",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race",
issn = "1742-058X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SOCIALLY DESIRABLE REPORTING and the EXPRESSION of BIOLOGICAL CONCEPTS of RACE

AU - Morning, Ann

AU - Brückner, Hannah

AU - Nelson, Alondra

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - In recent decades, dramatic developments in genetics research have begun to transform not only the practice of medicine but also conceptions of the social world. In the media, in popular culture, and in everyday conversation, Americans routinely link genetics to individual behavior and social outcomes. At the same time, some social researchers contend that biological definitions of race have lost ground in the United States over the last fifty years. At the crossroads of two trends - on one hand, the post-World War II recoil from biological accounts of racial difference, and on the other, the growing admiration for the advances of genetic science - the American public's conception of race is a phenomenon that merits greater attention from sociologists than it has received to date. However, survey data on racial attitudes has proven to be significantly affected by social desirability bias. While a number of studies have attempted to measure social desirability bias with regard to racial attitudes, most have focused on racial policy preferences rather than genetic accounts of racial inequality. We employ a list experiment to create an unobtrusive measure of support for a biologistic understanding of racial inequality. We show that one in five non-Black Americans attribute income inequality between Black and White people to unspecified genetic differences between the two groups. We also find that this number is substantially underestimated when using a direct question. The magnitude of social desirability effects varies, and is most pronounced among women, older people, and the highly-educated.

AB - In recent decades, dramatic developments in genetics research have begun to transform not only the practice of medicine but also conceptions of the social world. In the media, in popular culture, and in everyday conversation, Americans routinely link genetics to individual behavior and social outcomes. At the same time, some social researchers contend that biological definitions of race have lost ground in the United States over the last fifty years. At the crossroads of two trends - on one hand, the post-World War II recoil from biological accounts of racial difference, and on the other, the growing admiration for the advances of genetic science - the American public's conception of race is a phenomenon that merits greater attention from sociologists than it has received to date. However, survey data on racial attitudes has proven to be significantly affected by social desirability bias. While a number of studies have attempted to measure social desirability bias with regard to racial attitudes, most have focused on racial policy preferences rather than genetic accounts of racial inequality. We employ a list experiment to create an unobtrusive measure of support for a biologistic understanding of racial inequality. We show that one in five non-Black Americans attribute income inequality between Black and White people to unspecified genetic differences between the two groups. We also find that this number is substantially underestimated when using a direct question. The magnitude of social desirability effects varies, and is most pronounced among women, older people, and the highly-educated.

KW - Conceptualization

KW - Genetics

KW - Race

KW - Social Desirability

KW - Survey Experiments

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073523455&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073523455&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1742058X19000195

DO - 10.1017/S1742058X19000195

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85073523455

JO - Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race

JF - Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race

SN - 1742-058X

ER -