Social Value Orientation Moderates the Effects of Intuition versus Reflection on Responses to Unfair Ultimatum Offers

Maik Bieleke, Peter Gollwitzer, Gabriele Oettingen, Urs Fischbacher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We investigated whether social value orientation (SVO) moderates the effects of intuitive versus reflective information processing on responses to unfair offers. We measured SVO one week prior to an ultimatum game experiment in which participants had to accept or reject a series of 10 ultimatum offers including very low (unfair) ones. Before making these decisions, participants mentally contrasted their individual goals with the obstacle of pondering at length or acting in a hasty way; then they made the plan to adopt an intuitive or a reflective mode of processing (intuitive and reflective condition, respectively), or made no such plans (control condition). Participants with rather high (prosocial) SVO scores were more likely to accept unfair offers in the reflective than the intuitive condition. This effect also evinced for a subset of selfish individuals; however, the majority with rather low (selfish) scores made similar decisions in both conditions. This pattern of results suggests that SVO moderates the effects of intuitive versus reflective modes of processing on responses to low ultimatum offers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Behavioral Decision Making
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2016

Fingerprint

Social Values
Intuition
value-orientation
intuition
information processing
decision making
Value orientations
Social values
Ultimatum
Reflective
experiment
Automatic Data Processing
Decision Making

Keywords

  • Dual-process models
  • Fairness
  • Intuition versus reflection
  • Social value orientation (SVO)
  • Ultimatum game

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Decision Sciences(all)
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

@article{f9e01b4157f843d78a39e8bfd207034c,
title = "Social Value Orientation Moderates the Effects of Intuition versus Reflection on Responses to Unfair Ultimatum Offers",
abstract = "We investigated whether social value orientation (SVO) moderates the effects of intuitive versus reflective information processing on responses to unfair offers. We measured SVO one week prior to an ultimatum game experiment in which participants had to accept or reject a series of 10 ultimatum offers including very low (unfair) ones. Before making these decisions, participants mentally contrasted their individual goals with the obstacle of pondering at length or acting in a hasty way; then they made the plan to adopt an intuitive or a reflective mode of processing (intuitive and reflective condition, respectively), or made no such plans (control condition). Participants with rather high (prosocial) SVO scores were more likely to accept unfair offers in the reflective than the intuitive condition. This effect also evinced for a subset of selfish individuals; however, the majority with rather low (selfish) scores made similar decisions in both conditions. This pattern of results suggests that SVO moderates the effects of intuitive versus reflective modes of processing on responses to low ultimatum offers.",
keywords = "Dual-process models, Fairness, Intuition versus reflection, Social value orientation (SVO), Ultimatum game",
author = "Maik Bieleke and Peter Gollwitzer and Gabriele Oettingen and Urs Fischbacher",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1002/bdm.1975",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Behavioral Decision Making",
issn = "0894-3257",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social Value Orientation Moderates the Effects of Intuition versus Reflection on Responses to Unfair Ultimatum Offers

AU - Bieleke, Maik

AU - Gollwitzer, Peter

AU - Oettingen, Gabriele

AU - Fischbacher, Urs

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - We investigated whether social value orientation (SVO) moderates the effects of intuitive versus reflective information processing on responses to unfair offers. We measured SVO one week prior to an ultimatum game experiment in which participants had to accept or reject a series of 10 ultimatum offers including very low (unfair) ones. Before making these decisions, participants mentally contrasted their individual goals with the obstacle of pondering at length or acting in a hasty way; then they made the plan to adopt an intuitive or a reflective mode of processing (intuitive and reflective condition, respectively), or made no such plans (control condition). Participants with rather high (prosocial) SVO scores were more likely to accept unfair offers in the reflective than the intuitive condition. This effect also evinced for a subset of selfish individuals; however, the majority with rather low (selfish) scores made similar decisions in both conditions. This pattern of results suggests that SVO moderates the effects of intuitive versus reflective modes of processing on responses to low ultimatum offers.

AB - We investigated whether social value orientation (SVO) moderates the effects of intuitive versus reflective information processing on responses to unfair offers. We measured SVO one week prior to an ultimatum game experiment in which participants had to accept or reject a series of 10 ultimatum offers including very low (unfair) ones. Before making these decisions, participants mentally contrasted their individual goals with the obstacle of pondering at length or acting in a hasty way; then they made the plan to adopt an intuitive or a reflective mode of processing (intuitive and reflective condition, respectively), or made no such plans (control condition). Participants with rather high (prosocial) SVO scores were more likely to accept unfair offers in the reflective than the intuitive condition. This effect also evinced for a subset of selfish individuals; however, the majority with rather low (selfish) scores made similar decisions in both conditions. This pattern of results suggests that SVO moderates the effects of intuitive versus reflective modes of processing on responses to low ultimatum offers.

KW - Dual-process models

KW - Fairness

KW - Intuition versus reflection

KW - Social value orientation (SVO)

KW - Ultimatum game

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994589098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994589098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/bdm.1975

DO - 10.1002/bdm.1975

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

JF - Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

SN - 0894-3257

ER -