Social norms and energy conservation

Hunt Allcott

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This paper evaluates a series of programs run by a company called OPOWER to send Home Energy Report letters to residential utility customers comparing their electricity use to that of their neighbors. Using data from randomized natural field experiments at 600,000 treatment and control households across the United States, I estimate that the average program reduces energy consumption by 2.0%. The program provides additional evidence that non-price interventions can substantially and cost effectively change consumer behavior: the effect is equivalent to that of a short-run electricity price increase of 11 to 20%, and the cost effectiveness compares favorably to that of traditional energy conservation programs. Perhaps because the treatment included descriptive social norms, effects are heterogeneous: households in the highest decile of pre-treatment consumption decrease usage by 6.3%, while consumption by the lowest decile decreases by only 0.3%. A regression discontinuity design shows that different categories of "injunctive norms" played an insignificant role in encouraging relatively low users not to increase usage.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1082-1095
    Number of pages14
    JournalJournal of Public Economics
    Volume95
    Issue number9-10
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Oct 2011

    Fingerprint

    Energy conservation
    Social norms
    Household
    Regression discontinuity design
    Short-run
    Energy
    Natural field experiment
    Electricity
    Electricity price
    Energy consumption
    Costs
    Pretreatment
    Conservation programs
    Cost-effectiveness
    Consumer behaviour

    Keywords

    • Energy demand
    • Randomized field experiments
    • Social norms

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Finance
    • Economics and Econometrics

    Cite this

    Social norms and energy conservation. / Allcott, Hunt.

    In: Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 95, No. 9-10, 10.2011, p. 1082-1095.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Allcott, Hunt. / Social norms and energy conservation. In: Journal of Public Economics. 2011 ; Vol. 95, No. 9-10. pp. 1082-1095.
    @article{56df581f191f4166bc93c6e39b5ae1b2,
    title = "Social norms and energy conservation",
    abstract = "This paper evaluates a series of programs run by a company called OPOWER to send Home Energy Report letters to residential utility customers comparing their electricity use to that of their neighbors. Using data from randomized natural field experiments at 600,000 treatment and control households across the United States, I estimate that the average program reduces energy consumption by 2.0{\%}. The program provides additional evidence that non-price interventions can substantially and cost effectively change consumer behavior: the effect is equivalent to that of a short-run electricity price increase of 11 to 20{\%}, and the cost effectiveness compares favorably to that of traditional energy conservation programs. Perhaps because the treatment included descriptive social norms, effects are heterogeneous: households in the highest decile of pre-treatment consumption decrease usage by 6.3{\%}, while consumption by the lowest decile decreases by only 0.3{\%}. A regression discontinuity design shows that different categories of {"}injunctive norms{"} played an insignificant role in encouraging relatively low users not to increase usage.",
    keywords = "Energy demand, Randomized field experiments, Social norms",
    author = "Hunt Allcott",
    year = "2011",
    month = "10",
    doi = "10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.003",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "95",
    pages = "1082--1095",
    journal = "Journal of Public Economics",
    issn = "0047-2727",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "9-10",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Social norms and energy conservation

    AU - Allcott, Hunt

    PY - 2011/10

    Y1 - 2011/10

    N2 - This paper evaluates a series of programs run by a company called OPOWER to send Home Energy Report letters to residential utility customers comparing their electricity use to that of their neighbors. Using data from randomized natural field experiments at 600,000 treatment and control households across the United States, I estimate that the average program reduces energy consumption by 2.0%. The program provides additional evidence that non-price interventions can substantially and cost effectively change consumer behavior: the effect is equivalent to that of a short-run electricity price increase of 11 to 20%, and the cost effectiveness compares favorably to that of traditional energy conservation programs. Perhaps because the treatment included descriptive social norms, effects are heterogeneous: households in the highest decile of pre-treatment consumption decrease usage by 6.3%, while consumption by the lowest decile decreases by only 0.3%. A regression discontinuity design shows that different categories of "injunctive norms" played an insignificant role in encouraging relatively low users not to increase usage.

    AB - This paper evaluates a series of programs run by a company called OPOWER to send Home Energy Report letters to residential utility customers comparing their electricity use to that of their neighbors. Using data from randomized natural field experiments at 600,000 treatment and control households across the United States, I estimate that the average program reduces energy consumption by 2.0%. The program provides additional evidence that non-price interventions can substantially and cost effectively change consumer behavior: the effect is equivalent to that of a short-run electricity price increase of 11 to 20%, and the cost effectiveness compares favorably to that of traditional energy conservation programs. Perhaps because the treatment included descriptive social norms, effects are heterogeneous: households in the highest decile of pre-treatment consumption decrease usage by 6.3%, while consumption by the lowest decile decreases by only 0.3%. A regression discontinuity design shows that different categories of "injunctive norms" played an insignificant role in encouraging relatively low users not to increase usage.

    KW - Energy demand

    KW - Randomized field experiments

    KW - Social norms

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79961027119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79961027119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.003

    DO - 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.003

    M3 - Article

    VL - 95

    SP - 1082

    EP - 1095

    JO - Journal of Public Economics

    JF - Journal of Public Economics

    SN - 0047-2727

    IS - 9-10

    ER -