Social dominance orientation, authoritarianism, and support for intergroup violence between the middle east and America

Pj Henry, Jim Sidanius, Shana Levin, Felicia Pratto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Social dominance theory has generally posited that terror and intergroup violence can be explained in terms of social dominance struggles. Social dominance theorists have described terror mostly as a tool for maintaining intergroup hierarchies in society (Sidanius & Pratto, 1999). Although implications of the theory suggest that terror may also be used by lower status groups as a tool for the resistance of domination by higher status groups, this prediction heretofore has not been empirically demonstrated. Data from two samples, one in the United States and one in Lebanon, were collected regarding attitudes toward terrorism and intergroup violence. The results show that the American sample demonstrates the typical patterns of social dominance such that those who are higher in social dominance orientation tend to support greater violence toward the Middle East. However, the Lebanese sample shows the opposite pattern, such that those who are lower in social dominance orientation tend to support violence toward the West. These results suggest that (1) support for terrorism among Middle East citizens is a project of counter-dominance, and, more broadly, that (2) the relationship between social dominance orientation and support for violence depends on the dynamics of the conflict and the status of the perpetrators.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)569-583
Number of pages15
JournalPolitical Psychology
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2005

Fingerprint

Authoritarianism
Social Dominance
Middle East
authoritarianism
Violence
violence
terrorism
Terrorism
status group
Lebanon
Social Support
domination
citizen

Keywords

  • Aggression
  • Authoritarianism
  • Middle East
  • Power and status differences
  • Social dominance
  • Terrorism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Philosophy
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Social dominance orientation, authoritarianism, and support for intergroup violence between the middle east and America. / Henry, Pj; Sidanius, Jim; Levin, Shana; Pratto, Felicia.

In: Political Psychology, Vol. 26, No. 4, 01.08.2005, p. 569-583.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{094dde0415c045cca7c626f6a5982f7b,
title = "Social dominance orientation, authoritarianism, and support for intergroup violence between the middle east and America",
abstract = "Social dominance theory has generally posited that terror and intergroup violence can be explained in terms of social dominance struggles. Social dominance theorists have described terror mostly as a tool for maintaining intergroup hierarchies in society (Sidanius & Pratto, 1999). Although implications of the theory suggest that terror may also be used by lower status groups as a tool for the resistance of domination by higher status groups, this prediction heretofore has not been empirically demonstrated. Data from two samples, one in the United States and one in Lebanon, were collected regarding attitudes toward terrorism and intergroup violence. The results show that the American sample demonstrates the typical patterns of social dominance such that those who are higher in social dominance orientation tend to support greater violence toward the Middle East. However, the Lebanese sample shows the opposite pattern, such that those who are lower in social dominance orientation tend to support violence toward the West. These results suggest that (1) support for terrorism among Middle East citizens is a project of counter-dominance, and, more broadly, that (2) the relationship between social dominance orientation and support for violence depends on the dynamics of the conflict and the status of the perpetrators.",
keywords = "Aggression, Authoritarianism, Middle East, Power and status differences, Social dominance, Terrorism",
author = "Pj Henry and Jim Sidanius and Shana Levin and Felicia Pratto",
year = "2005",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00432.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "569--583",
journal = "Political Psychology",
issn = "0162-895X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social dominance orientation, authoritarianism, and support for intergroup violence between the middle east and America

AU - Henry, Pj

AU - Sidanius, Jim

AU - Levin, Shana

AU - Pratto, Felicia

PY - 2005/8/1

Y1 - 2005/8/1

N2 - Social dominance theory has generally posited that terror and intergroup violence can be explained in terms of social dominance struggles. Social dominance theorists have described terror mostly as a tool for maintaining intergroup hierarchies in society (Sidanius & Pratto, 1999). Although implications of the theory suggest that terror may also be used by lower status groups as a tool for the resistance of domination by higher status groups, this prediction heretofore has not been empirically demonstrated. Data from two samples, one in the United States and one in Lebanon, were collected regarding attitudes toward terrorism and intergroup violence. The results show that the American sample demonstrates the typical patterns of social dominance such that those who are higher in social dominance orientation tend to support greater violence toward the Middle East. However, the Lebanese sample shows the opposite pattern, such that those who are lower in social dominance orientation tend to support violence toward the West. These results suggest that (1) support for terrorism among Middle East citizens is a project of counter-dominance, and, more broadly, that (2) the relationship between social dominance orientation and support for violence depends on the dynamics of the conflict and the status of the perpetrators.

AB - Social dominance theory has generally posited that terror and intergroup violence can be explained in terms of social dominance struggles. Social dominance theorists have described terror mostly as a tool for maintaining intergroup hierarchies in society (Sidanius & Pratto, 1999). Although implications of the theory suggest that terror may also be used by lower status groups as a tool for the resistance of domination by higher status groups, this prediction heretofore has not been empirically demonstrated. Data from two samples, one in the United States and one in Lebanon, were collected regarding attitudes toward terrorism and intergroup violence. The results show that the American sample demonstrates the typical patterns of social dominance such that those who are higher in social dominance orientation tend to support greater violence toward the Middle East. However, the Lebanese sample shows the opposite pattern, such that those who are lower in social dominance orientation tend to support violence toward the West. These results suggest that (1) support for terrorism among Middle East citizens is a project of counter-dominance, and, more broadly, that (2) the relationship between social dominance orientation and support for violence depends on the dynamics of the conflict and the status of the perpetrators.

KW - Aggression

KW - Authoritarianism

KW - Middle East

KW - Power and status differences

KW - Social dominance

KW - Terrorism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23844459318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23844459318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00432.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00432.x

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 569

EP - 583

JO - Political Psychology

JF - Political Psychology

SN - 0162-895X

IS - 4

ER -