Social Democracy and Economic Liberty

Steven Lukes

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Tomasi’s view of social democracy is shown to mischaracterize it as hostile to private economic liberties, which all real-world social democracies guarantee. The supposed Manichean choice between social and market democracy, seen as requiring contrasting accounts of fairness, results from combining Rawls-style idealization of regime types, the Hayekian presumption that social democracies are advancing along the road to serfdom, and tendentious appeal to scant and unconvincing historical evidence. The proposed constitutional protection of ‘thick,’ market-based economic liberties, as favoring both individual self-authorship and fair equality of opportunity, is defended by Tomasi against high-liberal and social democratic views as compatible with what Rawls’s social justice demands, but as their scope expands in the course of the book this fails to convince. Finally it is argued that the ever-expanding reach of the market across all social life, with feedback effects on the formation of preferences, renders questionable Tomasi’s claims that his account of market fairness is neutral with respect to ways of life and that it specifies conditions under which individuals can live lives that are truly their own.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)429-441
    Number of pages13
    JournalRes Publica
    Volume21
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

    Fingerprint

    social democracy
    social economics
    market
    fairness
    serfdom
    way of life
    social justice
    economics
    equality
    guarantee
    appeal
    regime
    democracy
    Economics
    Social Democracy
    Liberty
    evidence
    Fairness

    Keywords

    • Commodification
    • Economic freedom
    • Redistribution
    • Self-authorship
    • Social justice

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Law
    • Philosophy

    Cite this

    Social Democracy and Economic Liberty. / Lukes, Steven.

    In: Res Publica, Vol. 21, No. 4, 01.12.2015, p. 429-441.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Lukes, Steven. / Social Democracy and Economic Liberty. In: Res Publica. 2015 ; Vol. 21, No. 4. pp. 429-441.
    @article{9c50d0684c3846eaa4f38153e8c3f8b3,
    title = "Social Democracy and Economic Liberty",
    abstract = "Tomasi’s view of social democracy is shown to mischaracterize it as hostile to private economic liberties, which all real-world social democracies guarantee. The supposed Manichean choice between social and market democracy, seen as requiring contrasting accounts of fairness, results from combining Rawls-style idealization of regime types, the Hayekian presumption that social democracies are advancing along the road to serfdom, and tendentious appeal to scant and unconvincing historical evidence. The proposed constitutional protection of ‘thick,’ market-based economic liberties, as favoring both individual self-authorship and fair equality of opportunity, is defended by Tomasi against high-liberal and social democratic views as compatible with what Rawls’s social justice demands, but as their scope expands in the course of the book this fails to convince. Finally it is argued that the ever-expanding reach of the market across all social life, with feedback effects on the formation of preferences, renders questionable Tomasi’s claims that his account of market fairness is neutral with respect to ways of life and that it specifies conditions under which individuals can live lives that are truly their own.",
    keywords = "Commodification, Economic freedom, Redistribution, Self-authorship, Social justice",
    author = "Steven Lukes",
    year = "2015",
    month = "12",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1007/s11158-015-9302-1",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "21",
    pages = "429--441",
    journal = "Res Publica",
    issn = "1356-4765",
    publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Social Democracy and Economic Liberty

    AU - Lukes, Steven

    PY - 2015/12/1

    Y1 - 2015/12/1

    N2 - Tomasi’s view of social democracy is shown to mischaracterize it as hostile to private economic liberties, which all real-world social democracies guarantee. The supposed Manichean choice between social and market democracy, seen as requiring contrasting accounts of fairness, results from combining Rawls-style idealization of regime types, the Hayekian presumption that social democracies are advancing along the road to serfdom, and tendentious appeal to scant and unconvincing historical evidence. The proposed constitutional protection of ‘thick,’ market-based economic liberties, as favoring both individual self-authorship and fair equality of opportunity, is defended by Tomasi against high-liberal and social democratic views as compatible with what Rawls’s social justice demands, but as their scope expands in the course of the book this fails to convince. Finally it is argued that the ever-expanding reach of the market across all social life, with feedback effects on the formation of preferences, renders questionable Tomasi’s claims that his account of market fairness is neutral with respect to ways of life and that it specifies conditions under which individuals can live lives that are truly their own.

    AB - Tomasi’s view of social democracy is shown to mischaracterize it as hostile to private economic liberties, which all real-world social democracies guarantee. The supposed Manichean choice between social and market democracy, seen as requiring contrasting accounts of fairness, results from combining Rawls-style idealization of regime types, the Hayekian presumption that social democracies are advancing along the road to serfdom, and tendentious appeal to scant and unconvincing historical evidence. The proposed constitutional protection of ‘thick,’ market-based economic liberties, as favoring both individual self-authorship and fair equality of opportunity, is defended by Tomasi against high-liberal and social democratic views as compatible with what Rawls’s social justice demands, but as their scope expands in the course of the book this fails to convince. Finally it is argued that the ever-expanding reach of the market across all social life, with feedback effects on the formation of preferences, renders questionable Tomasi’s claims that his account of market fairness is neutral with respect to ways of life and that it specifies conditions under which individuals can live lives that are truly their own.

    KW - Commodification

    KW - Economic freedom

    KW - Redistribution

    KW - Self-authorship

    KW - Social justice

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955354528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955354528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/s11158-015-9302-1

    DO - 10.1007/s11158-015-9302-1

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84955354528

    VL - 21

    SP - 429

    EP - 441

    JO - Res Publica

    JF - Res Publica

    SN - 1356-4765

    IS - 4

    ER -