Social Categories as Markers of Intrinsic Interpersonal Obligations

Marjorie Rhodes, Lisa Chalik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Social categorization is an early-developing feature of human social cognition, yet the role that social categories play in children's understanding of and predictions about human behavior has been unclear. In the studies reported here, we tested whether a foundational functional role of social categories is to mark people as intrinsically obligated to one another (e.g., obligated to protect rather than harm). In three studies, children (aged 3-9, N = 124) viewed only within-category harm as violating intrinsic obligations; in contrast, they viewed between-category harm as violating extrinsic obligations defined by explicit rules. These data indicate that children view social categories as marking patterns of intrinsic interpersonal obligations, suggesting that a key function of social categories is to support inferences about how people will relate to members of their own and other groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)999-1006
Number of pages8
JournalPsychological Science
Volume24
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Cognition
Intrinsic
Obligation
Harm
Prediction
Social Cognition
Child Studies
Human Behavior
Inference
Extrinsic

Keywords

  • cognitive development
  • intuitive theories
  • social categorization
  • social cognition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Social Categories as Markers of Intrinsic Interpersonal Obligations. / Rhodes, Marjorie; Chalik, Lisa.

In: Psychological Science, Vol. 24, No. 6, 06.2013, p. 999-1006.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{83f8ffedbc3c4538ac6acb5573657937,
title = "Social Categories as Markers of Intrinsic Interpersonal Obligations",
abstract = "Social categorization is an early-developing feature of human social cognition, yet the role that social categories play in children's understanding of and predictions about human behavior has been unclear. In the studies reported here, we tested whether a foundational functional role of social categories is to mark people as intrinsically obligated to one another (e.g., obligated to protect rather than harm). In three studies, children (aged 3-9, N = 124) viewed only within-category harm as violating intrinsic obligations; in contrast, they viewed between-category harm as violating extrinsic obligations defined by explicit rules. These data indicate that children view social categories as marking patterns of intrinsic interpersonal obligations, suggesting that a key function of social categories is to support inferences about how people will relate to members of their own and other groups.",
keywords = "cognitive development, intuitive theories, social categorization, social cognition",
author = "Marjorie Rhodes and Lisa Chalik",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1177/0956797612466267",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "999--1006",
journal = "Psychological Science",
issn = "0956-7976",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social Categories as Markers of Intrinsic Interpersonal Obligations

AU - Rhodes, Marjorie

AU - Chalik, Lisa

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - Social categorization is an early-developing feature of human social cognition, yet the role that social categories play in children's understanding of and predictions about human behavior has been unclear. In the studies reported here, we tested whether a foundational functional role of social categories is to mark people as intrinsically obligated to one another (e.g., obligated to protect rather than harm). In three studies, children (aged 3-9, N = 124) viewed only within-category harm as violating intrinsic obligations; in contrast, they viewed between-category harm as violating extrinsic obligations defined by explicit rules. These data indicate that children view social categories as marking patterns of intrinsic interpersonal obligations, suggesting that a key function of social categories is to support inferences about how people will relate to members of their own and other groups.

AB - Social categorization is an early-developing feature of human social cognition, yet the role that social categories play in children's understanding of and predictions about human behavior has been unclear. In the studies reported here, we tested whether a foundational functional role of social categories is to mark people as intrinsically obligated to one another (e.g., obligated to protect rather than harm). In three studies, children (aged 3-9, N = 124) viewed only within-category harm as violating intrinsic obligations; in contrast, they viewed between-category harm as violating extrinsic obligations defined by explicit rules. These data indicate that children view social categories as marking patterns of intrinsic interpersonal obligations, suggesting that a key function of social categories is to support inferences about how people will relate to members of their own and other groups.

KW - cognitive development

KW - intuitive theories

KW - social categorization

KW - social cognition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878777027&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878777027&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0956797612466267

DO - 10.1177/0956797612466267

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 999

EP - 1006

JO - Psychological Science

JF - Psychological Science

SN - 0956-7976

IS - 6

ER -