Smoking-cessation interventions for U.S. young adults

A systematic review

Andrea C. Villanti, Heather S. McKay, David Abrams, David R. Holtgrave, Janice V. Bowie

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Context: Studies have demonstrated the importance of quitting smoking before age 30 years to avoid tobacco-related mortality but little attention has been paid to developing evidence-based smoking-cessation interventions for young adults, as distinct from adolescents and older-aged adults. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of smoking-cessation interventions for U.S. young adults (aged 1824 years). Evidence acquisition: Electronic searches were conducted in CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Sociological Abstracts to identify eligible interventions through August 31, 2009. Two independent coders critically evaluated the methodology and findings of all retrieved articles. Data analysis was conducted in 2010. Evidence synthesis: Twelve RCTs and two nonrandomized studies met the inclusion criteria; these studies varied with respect to sample size, intervention, outcomes assessed, and smoking measures. Pooled results for two studies based on social cognitive theory indicated that they were effective in promoting short-term abstinence at 13-month follow-up and 46-month follow-up. Four studies had a significant positive impact on smoking cessation: two in the short term and two at 6 months or more. Conclusions: There is limited evidence demonstrating efficacy of smoking-cessation interventions for U.S. young adults. There were no pharmacologic interventions included in this review. Promising interventions were brief, with extended support via telephone and electronic media. Further high-quality studies using standardized smoking measures and additional studies outside the college setting are needed to identify and tailor effective smoking-cessation interventions for at-risk young adults in the U.S.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)564-574
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume39
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2010

Fingerprint

Smoking Cessation
Young Adult
Smoking
Telephone
PubMed
Sample Size
Libraries
Tobacco
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Smoking-cessation interventions for U.S. young adults : A systematic review. / Villanti, Andrea C.; McKay, Heather S.; Abrams, David; Holtgrave, David R.; Bowie, Janice V.

In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 39, No. 6, 12.2010, p. 564-574.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Villanti, Andrea C. ; McKay, Heather S. ; Abrams, David ; Holtgrave, David R. ; Bowie, Janice V. / Smoking-cessation interventions for U.S. young adults : A systematic review. In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2010 ; Vol. 39, No. 6. pp. 564-574.
@article{69c49d8312ac429a9bf9cab9688259de,
title = "Smoking-cessation interventions for U.S. young adults: A systematic review",
abstract = "Context: Studies have demonstrated the importance of quitting smoking before age 30 years to avoid tobacco-related mortality but little attention has been paid to developing evidence-based smoking-cessation interventions for young adults, as distinct from adolescents and older-aged adults. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of smoking-cessation interventions for U.S. young adults (aged 1824 years). Evidence acquisition: Electronic searches were conducted in CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Sociological Abstracts to identify eligible interventions through August 31, 2009. Two independent coders critically evaluated the methodology and findings of all retrieved articles. Data analysis was conducted in 2010. Evidence synthesis: Twelve RCTs and two nonrandomized studies met the inclusion criteria; these studies varied with respect to sample size, intervention, outcomes assessed, and smoking measures. Pooled results for two studies based on social cognitive theory indicated that they were effective in promoting short-term abstinence at 13-month follow-up and 46-month follow-up. Four studies had a significant positive impact on smoking cessation: two in the short term and two at 6 months or more. Conclusions: There is limited evidence demonstrating efficacy of smoking-cessation interventions for U.S. young adults. There were no pharmacologic interventions included in this review. Promising interventions were brief, with extended support via telephone and electronic media. Further high-quality studies using standardized smoking measures and additional studies outside the college setting are needed to identify and tailor effective smoking-cessation interventions for at-risk young adults in the U.S.",
author = "Villanti, {Andrea C.} and McKay, {Heather S.} and David Abrams and Holtgrave, {David R.} and Bowie, {Janice V.}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.amepre.2010.08.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "564--574",
journal = "American Journal of Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0749-3797",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Smoking-cessation interventions for U.S. young adults

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Villanti, Andrea C.

AU - McKay, Heather S.

AU - Abrams, David

AU - Holtgrave, David R.

AU - Bowie, Janice V.

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - Context: Studies have demonstrated the importance of quitting smoking before age 30 years to avoid tobacco-related mortality but little attention has been paid to developing evidence-based smoking-cessation interventions for young adults, as distinct from adolescents and older-aged adults. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of smoking-cessation interventions for U.S. young adults (aged 1824 years). Evidence acquisition: Electronic searches were conducted in CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Sociological Abstracts to identify eligible interventions through August 31, 2009. Two independent coders critically evaluated the methodology and findings of all retrieved articles. Data analysis was conducted in 2010. Evidence synthesis: Twelve RCTs and two nonrandomized studies met the inclusion criteria; these studies varied with respect to sample size, intervention, outcomes assessed, and smoking measures. Pooled results for two studies based on social cognitive theory indicated that they were effective in promoting short-term abstinence at 13-month follow-up and 46-month follow-up. Four studies had a significant positive impact on smoking cessation: two in the short term and two at 6 months or more. Conclusions: There is limited evidence demonstrating efficacy of smoking-cessation interventions for U.S. young adults. There were no pharmacologic interventions included in this review. Promising interventions were brief, with extended support via telephone and electronic media. Further high-quality studies using standardized smoking measures and additional studies outside the college setting are needed to identify and tailor effective smoking-cessation interventions for at-risk young adults in the U.S.

AB - Context: Studies have demonstrated the importance of quitting smoking before age 30 years to avoid tobacco-related mortality but little attention has been paid to developing evidence-based smoking-cessation interventions for young adults, as distinct from adolescents and older-aged adults. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of smoking-cessation interventions for U.S. young adults (aged 1824 years). Evidence acquisition: Electronic searches were conducted in CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Sociological Abstracts to identify eligible interventions through August 31, 2009. Two independent coders critically evaluated the methodology and findings of all retrieved articles. Data analysis was conducted in 2010. Evidence synthesis: Twelve RCTs and two nonrandomized studies met the inclusion criteria; these studies varied with respect to sample size, intervention, outcomes assessed, and smoking measures. Pooled results for two studies based on social cognitive theory indicated that they were effective in promoting short-term abstinence at 13-month follow-up and 46-month follow-up. Four studies had a significant positive impact on smoking cessation: two in the short term and two at 6 months or more. Conclusions: There is limited evidence demonstrating efficacy of smoking-cessation interventions for U.S. young adults. There were no pharmacologic interventions included in this review. Promising interventions were brief, with extended support via telephone and electronic media. Further high-quality studies using standardized smoking measures and additional studies outside the college setting are needed to identify and tailor effective smoking-cessation interventions for at-risk young adults in the U.S.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952278920&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952278920&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.08.009

DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.08.009

M3 - Review article

VL - 39

SP - 564

EP - 574

JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

SN - 0749-3797

IS - 6

ER -