Size and strategy of Italian industrial enterprises (1907-1940)

Empirical evidence and some conjectures

Renato Giannetti, Giovanni Federico, Pier Angelo Toninelli

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Conventional wisdom concerning Italian industry does not fit well into the general scheme of the Second Industrial Revolution as constituted by the growth and diffusion of large-size enterprises. This wisdom held that Italian industry was dominated by a small group of large enterprises as a direct consequence of the country's backwardness. These enterprises were weak giants, unable to attain the dynamic advantages usually reaped by such organizations. Such interpretations have been generally based on qualitative evidence because the quantitative evidence is very scanty. The older studies suggest a very high concentration, while recent studies stress the evidence of scale economies and market imperfections. Neither result is convincing for technical reasons. This paper therefore aims at a reassessment based on a newly constructed database of Italian joint stock companies. This evidence does not support the traditional view. Rather, it indicated that concentration indices are fairly low and that they do not grow over the period, the bulk of the firms being of medium size and the giant companies few. Although such a situation could be attributed to Italian backwardness, the paper concludes that this view is too simplistic. It concludes by showing how successful Italian companies have been able to take advantage of their size by means of flexible strategies.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)491-512
    Number of pages22
    JournalIndustrial and Corporate Change
    Volume3
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Dec 1 1994

    Fingerprint

    Industrial enterprise
    Empirical evidence
    Wisdom
    Industry
    Large enterprises
    Joint-stock company
    Data base
    Market imperfections
    Industrial revolution
    Concentration index
    Economies of scale

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics and Econometrics

    Cite this

    Size and strategy of Italian industrial enterprises (1907-1940) : Empirical evidence and some conjectures. / Giannetti, Renato; Federico, Giovanni; Toninelli, Pier Angelo.

    In: Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 3, No. 2, 01.12.1994, p. 491-512.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Giannetti, Renato ; Federico, Giovanni ; Toninelli, Pier Angelo. / Size and strategy of Italian industrial enterprises (1907-1940) : Empirical evidence and some conjectures. In: Industrial and Corporate Change. 1994 ; Vol. 3, No. 2. pp. 491-512.
    @article{37b1131a4c9a417684f612ad06ff6d44,
    title = "Size and strategy of Italian industrial enterprises (1907-1940): Empirical evidence and some conjectures",
    abstract = "Conventional wisdom concerning Italian industry does not fit well into the general scheme of the Second Industrial Revolution as constituted by the growth and diffusion of large-size enterprises. This wisdom held that Italian industry was dominated by a small group of large enterprises as a direct consequence of the country's backwardness. These enterprises were weak giants, unable to attain the dynamic advantages usually reaped by such organizations. Such interpretations have been generally based on qualitative evidence because the quantitative evidence is very scanty. The older studies suggest a very high concentration, while recent studies stress the evidence of scale economies and market imperfections. Neither result is convincing for technical reasons. This paper therefore aims at a reassessment based on a newly constructed database of Italian joint stock companies. This evidence does not support the traditional view. Rather, it indicated that concentration indices are fairly low and that they do not grow over the period, the bulk of the firms being of medium size and the giant companies few. Although such a situation could be attributed to Italian backwardness, the paper concludes that this view is too simplistic. It concludes by showing how successful Italian companies have been able to take advantage of their size by means of flexible strategies.",
    author = "Renato Giannetti and Giovanni Federico and Toninelli, {Pier Angelo}",
    year = "1994",
    month = "12",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1093/icc/3.2.491",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "3",
    pages = "491--512",
    journal = "Industrial and Corporate Change",
    issn = "0960-6491",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Size and strategy of Italian industrial enterprises (1907-1940)

    T2 - Empirical evidence and some conjectures

    AU - Giannetti, Renato

    AU - Federico, Giovanni

    AU - Toninelli, Pier Angelo

    PY - 1994/12/1

    Y1 - 1994/12/1

    N2 - Conventional wisdom concerning Italian industry does not fit well into the general scheme of the Second Industrial Revolution as constituted by the growth and diffusion of large-size enterprises. This wisdom held that Italian industry was dominated by a small group of large enterprises as a direct consequence of the country's backwardness. These enterprises were weak giants, unable to attain the dynamic advantages usually reaped by such organizations. Such interpretations have been generally based on qualitative evidence because the quantitative evidence is very scanty. The older studies suggest a very high concentration, while recent studies stress the evidence of scale economies and market imperfections. Neither result is convincing for technical reasons. This paper therefore aims at a reassessment based on a newly constructed database of Italian joint stock companies. This evidence does not support the traditional view. Rather, it indicated that concentration indices are fairly low and that they do not grow over the period, the bulk of the firms being of medium size and the giant companies few. Although such a situation could be attributed to Italian backwardness, the paper concludes that this view is too simplistic. It concludes by showing how successful Italian companies have been able to take advantage of their size by means of flexible strategies.

    AB - Conventional wisdom concerning Italian industry does not fit well into the general scheme of the Second Industrial Revolution as constituted by the growth and diffusion of large-size enterprises. This wisdom held that Italian industry was dominated by a small group of large enterprises as a direct consequence of the country's backwardness. These enterprises were weak giants, unable to attain the dynamic advantages usually reaped by such organizations. Such interpretations have been generally based on qualitative evidence because the quantitative evidence is very scanty. The older studies suggest a very high concentration, while recent studies stress the evidence of scale economies and market imperfections. Neither result is convincing for technical reasons. This paper therefore aims at a reassessment based on a newly constructed database of Italian joint stock companies. This evidence does not support the traditional view. Rather, it indicated that concentration indices are fairly low and that they do not grow over the period, the bulk of the firms being of medium size and the giant companies few. Although such a situation could be attributed to Italian backwardness, the paper concludes that this view is too simplistic. It concludes by showing how successful Italian companies have been able to take advantage of their size by means of flexible strategies.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=5644263290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=5644263290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1093/icc/3.2.491

    DO - 10.1093/icc/3.2.491

    M3 - Article

    VL - 3

    SP - 491

    EP - 512

    JO - Industrial and Corporate Change

    JF - Industrial and Corporate Change

    SN - 0960-6491

    IS - 2

    ER -