Size and strategy of Italian industrial enterprises (1907-1940): Empirical evidence and some conjectures

Renato Giannetti, Giovanni Federico, Pier Angelo Toninelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Conventional wisdom concerning Italian industry does not fit well into the general scheme of the Second Industrial Revolution as constituted by the growth and diffusion of large-size enterprises. This wisdom held that Italian industry was dominated by a small group of large enterprises as a direct consequence of the country's backwardness. These enterprises were weak giants, unable to attain the dynamic advantages usually reaped by such organizations. Such interpretations have been generally based on qualitative evidence because the quantitative evidence is very scanty. The older studies suggest a very high concentration, while recent studies stress the evidence of scale economies and market imperfections. Neither result is convincing for technical reasons. This paper therefore aims at a reassessment based on a newly constructed database of Italian joint stock companies. This evidence does not support the traditional view. Rather, it indicated that concentration indices are fairly low and that they do not grow over the period, the bulk of the firms being of medium size and the giant companies few. Although such a situation could be attributed to Italian backwardness, the paper concludes that this view is too simplistic. It concludes by showing how successful Italian companies have been able to take advantage of their size by means of flexible strategies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)491-512
Number of pages22
JournalIndustrial and Corporate Change
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 1994

Fingerprint

Industrial enterprise
Empirical evidence
Wisdom
Industry
Large enterprises
Data base
Joint-stock company
Industrial revolution
Market imperfections
Concentration index
Economies of scale

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Size and strategy of Italian industrial enterprises (1907-1940) : Empirical evidence and some conjectures. / Giannetti, Renato; Federico, Giovanni; Toninelli, Pier Angelo.

In: Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 3, No. 2, 01.12.1994, p. 491-512.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Giannetti, Renato ; Federico, Giovanni ; Toninelli, Pier Angelo. / Size and strategy of Italian industrial enterprises (1907-1940) : Empirical evidence and some conjectures. In: Industrial and Corporate Change. 1994 ; Vol. 3, No. 2. pp. 491-512.
@article{37b1131a4c9a417684f612ad06ff6d44,
title = "Size and strategy of Italian industrial enterprises (1907-1940): Empirical evidence and some conjectures",
abstract = "Conventional wisdom concerning Italian industry does not fit well into the general scheme of the Second Industrial Revolution as constituted by the growth and diffusion of large-size enterprises. This wisdom held that Italian industry was dominated by a small group of large enterprises as a direct consequence of the country's backwardness. These enterprises were weak giants, unable to attain the dynamic advantages usually reaped by such organizations. Such interpretations have been generally based on qualitative evidence because the quantitative evidence is very scanty. The older studies suggest a very high concentration, while recent studies stress the evidence of scale economies and market imperfections. Neither result is convincing for technical reasons. This paper therefore aims at a reassessment based on a newly constructed database of Italian joint stock companies. This evidence does not support the traditional view. Rather, it indicated that concentration indices are fairly low and that they do not grow over the period, the bulk of the firms being of medium size and the giant companies few. Although such a situation could be attributed to Italian backwardness, the paper concludes that this view is too simplistic. It concludes by showing how successful Italian companies have been able to take advantage of their size by means of flexible strategies.",
author = "Renato Giannetti and Giovanni Federico and Toninelli, {Pier Angelo}",
year = "1994",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/icc/3.2.491",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "491--512",
journal = "Industrial and Corporate Change",
issn = "0960-6491",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Size and strategy of Italian industrial enterprises (1907-1940)

T2 - Empirical evidence and some conjectures

AU - Giannetti, Renato

AU - Federico, Giovanni

AU - Toninelli, Pier Angelo

PY - 1994/12/1

Y1 - 1994/12/1

N2 - Conventional wisdom concerning Italian industry does not fit well into the general scheme of the Second Industrial Revolution as constituted by the growth and diffusion of large-size enterprises. This wisdom held that Italian industry was dominated by a small group of large enterprises as a direct consequence of the country's backwardness. These enterprises were weak giants, unable to attain the dynamic advantages usually reaped by such organizations. Such interpretations have been generally based on qualitative evidence because the quantitative evidence is very scanty. The older studies suggest a very high concentration, while recent studies stress the evidence of scale economies and market imperfections. Neither result is convincing for technical reasons. This paper therefore aims at a reassessment based on a newly constructed database of Italian joint stock companies. This evidence does not support the traditional view. Rather, it indicated that concentration indices are fairly low and that they do not grow over the period, the bulk of the firms being of medium size and the giant companies few. Although such a situation could be attributed to Italian backwardness, the paper concludes that this view is too simplistic. It concludes by showing how successful Italian companies have been able to take advantage of their size by means of flexible strategies.

AB - Conventional wisdom concerning Italian industry does not fit well into the general scheme of the Second Industrial Revolution as constituted by the growth and diffusion of large-size enterprises. This wisdom held that Italian industry was dominated by a small group of large enterprises as a direct consequence of the country's backwardness. These enterprises were weak giants, unable to attain the dynamic advantages usually reaped by such organizations. Such interpretations have been generally based on qualitative evidence because the quantitative evidence is very scanty. The older studies suggest a very high concentration, while recent studies stress the evidence of scale economies and market imperfections. Neither result is convincing for technical reasons. This paper therefore aims at a reassessment based on a newly constructed database of Italian joint stock companies. This evidence does not support the traditional view. Rather, it indicated that concentration indices are fairly low and that they do not grow over the period, the bulk of the firms being of medium size and the giant companies few. Although such a situation could be attributed to Italian backwardness, the paper concludes that this view is too simplistic. It concludes by showing how successful Italian companies have been able to take advantage of their size by means of flexible strategies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=5644263290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=5644263290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/icc/3.2.491

DO - 10.1093/icc/3.2.491

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:5644263290

VL - 3

SP - 491

EP - 512

JO - Industrial and Corporate Change

JF - Industrial and Corporate Change

SN - 0960-6491

IS - 2

ER -