Single-peakedness and disconnected coalitions

Steven Brams, Michael A. Jones, D. Marc Kilgour

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Abstract

    Ordinally single-peaked preferences are distinguished from cardinally single-peaked preferences, in which all players have a similar perception of distances in some one-dimensional ordering. While ordinal single-peakedness can lead to disconnected coalitions that have a 'hole' in the ordering, cardinal single-peakedness precludes this possibility, based on two models of coalition formation: Fallback (FB): Players seek coalition partners by descending lower and lower in their preference rankings until a majority coalition forms. Build-Up (BU): Similar to FB, except that when non-majority subcoalitions form, they fuse into composite players, whose positions are defined cardinally. The 'strange bedfellows' frequently observed in legislative coalitions and military alliances suggest that even when players agree on, say, a left-right ordering, their perceptions of exactly where players stand in this ordering may differ substantially. If so, a player may be acceptable to a coalition but may not find every member in it acceptable, causing that player not to join and possibly creating a disconnected coalition.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)359-383
    Number of pages25
    JournalJournal of Theoretical Politics
    Volume14
    Issue number3
    StatePublished - Jul 2002

    Fingerprint

    coalition
    coalition formation
    ranking
    Military

    Keywords

    • Coalition formation
    • Dynamic process
    • Perceptions
    • Single-peakedness
    • Strange bedfellows

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Brams, S., Jones, M. A., & Kilgour, D. M. (2002). Single-peakedness and disconnected coalitions. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 14(3), 359-383.

    Single-peakedness and disconnected coalitions. / Brams, Steven; Jones, Michael A.; Kilgour, D. Marc.

    In: Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol. 14, No. 3, 07.2002, p. 359-383.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Brams, S, Jones, MA & Kilgour, DM 2002, 'Single-peakedness and disconnected coalitions', Journal of Theoretical Politics, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 359-383.
    Brams S, Jones MA, Kilgour DM. Single-peakedness and disconnected coalitions. Journal of Theoretical Politics. 2002 Jul;14(3):359-383.
    Brams, Steven ; Jones, Michael A. ; Kilgour, D. Marc. / Single-peakedness and disconnected coalitions. In: Journal of Theoretical Politics. 2002 ; Vol. 14, No. 3. pp. 359-383.
    @article{9084624ab65a4705beaffdbc39b0929f,
    title = "Single-peakedness and disconnected coalitions",
    abstract = "Ordinally single-peaked preferences are distinguished from cardinally single-peaked preferences, in which all players have a similar perception of distances in some one-dimensional ordering. While ordinal single-peakedness can lead to disconnected coalitions that have a 'hole' in the ordering, cardinal single-peakedness precludes this possibility, based on two models of coalition formation: Fallback (FB): Players seek coalition partners by descending lower and lower in their preference rankings until a majority coalition forms. Build-Up (BU): Similar to FB, except that when non-majority subcoalitions form, they fuse into composite players, whose positions are defined cardinally. The 'strange bedfellows' frequently observed in legislative coalitions and military alliances suggest that even when players agree on, say, a left-right ordering, their perceptions of exactly where players stand in this ordering may differ substantially. If so, a player may be acceptable to a coalition but may not find every member in it acceptable, causing that player not to join and possibly creating a disconnected coalition.",
    keywords = "Coalition formation, Dynamic process, Perceptions, Single-peakedness, Strange bedfellows",
    author = "Steven Brams and Jones, {Michael A.} and Kilgour, {D. Marc}",
    year = "2002",
    month = "7",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "14",
    pages = "359--383",
    journal = "Journal of Theoretical Politics",
    issn = "0951-6298",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Single-peakedness and disconnected coalitions

    AU - Brams, Steven

    AU - Jones, Michael A.

    AU - Kilgour, D. Marc

    PY - 2002/7

    Y1 - 2002/7

    N2 - Ordinally single-peaked preferences are distinguished from cardinally single-peaked preferences, in which all players have a similar perception of distances in some one-dimensional ordering. While ordinal single-peakedness can lead to disconnected coalitions that have a 'hole' in the ordering, cardinal single-peakedness precludes this possibility, based on two models of coalition formation: Fallback (FB): Players seek coalition partners by descending lower and lower in their preference rankings until a majority coalition forms. Build-Up (BU): Similar to FB, except that when non-majority subcoalitions form, they fuse into composite players, whose positions are defined cardinally. The 'strange bedfellows' frequently observed in legislative coalitions and military alliances suggest that even when players agree on, say, a left-right ordering, their perceptions of exactly where players stand in this ordering may differ substantially. If so, a player may be acceptable to a coalition but may not find every member in it acceptable, causing that player not to join and possibly creating a disconnected coalition.

    AB - Ordinally single-peaked preferences are distinguished from cardinally single-peaked preferences, in which all players have a similar perception of distances in some one-dimensional ordering. While ordinal single-peakedness can lead to disconnected coalitions that have a 'hole' in the ordering, cardinal single-peakedness precludes this possibility, based on two models of coalition formation: Fallback (FB): Players seek coalition partners by descending lower and lower in their preference rankings until a majority coalition forms. Build-Up (BU): Similar to FB, except that when non-majority subcoalitions form, they fuse into composite players, whose positions are defined cardinally. The 'strange bedfellows' frequently observed in legislative coalitions and military alliances suggest that even when players agree on, say, a left-right ordering, their perceptions of exactly where players stand in this ordering may differ substantially. If so, a player may be acceptable to a coalition but may not find every member in it acceptable, causing that player not to join and possibly creating a disconnected coalition.

    KW - Coalition formation

    KW - Dynamic process

    KW - Perceptions

    KW - Single-peakedness

    KW - Strange bedfellows

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038171223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038171223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Review article

    AN - SCOPUS:0038171223

    VL - 14

    SP - 359

    EP - 383

    JO - Journal of Theoretical Politics

    JF - Journal of Theoretical Politics

    SN - 0951-6298

    IS - 3

    ER -