Simulating strategy and dexterity for puzzle games

Aaron Isaksen, Drew Wallace, Adam Finkelstein, Andrew Nealen

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    Abstract

    We examine the impact of strategy and dexterity on video games in which a player must use strategy to decide between multiple moves and must use dexterity to correctly execute those moves. We run simulation experiments on variants of two popular, interactive puzzle games: Tetris, which exhibits dexterity in the form of speed-accuracy time pressure, and Puzzle Bobble, which requires precise aiming. By modeling dexterity and strategy as separate components, we quantify the effect of each type of difficulty using normalized mean score and artificial intelligence agents that make human-like errors. We show how these techniques can model and visualize dexterity and strategy requirements as well as the effect of scoring systems on expressive range.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publication2017 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games, CIG 2017
    PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
    Pages142-149
    Number of pages8
    ISBN (Electronic)9781538632338
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Oct 23 2017
    Event2017 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games, CIG 2017 - New York, United States
    Duration: Aug 22 2017Aug 25 2017

    Other

    Other2017 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games, CIG 2017
    CountryUnited States
    CityNew York
    Period8/22/178/25/17

    Fingerprint

    Artificial intelligence
    Experiments

    Keywords

    • AI-assisted game design
    • Automated play testing
    • Dexterity
    • Difficulty
    • Strategy

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Human-Computer Interaction
    • Media Technology

    Cite this

    Isaksen, A., Wallace, D., Finkelstein, A., & Nealen, A. (2017). Simulating strategy and dexterity for puzzle games. In 2017 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games, CIG 2017 (pp. 142-149). [8080427] Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIG.2017.8080427

    Simulating strategy and dexterity for puzzle games. / Isaksen, Aaron; Wallace, Drew; Finkelstein, Adam; Nealen, Andrew.

    2017 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games, CIG 2017. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2017. p. 142-149 8080427.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    Isaksen, A, Wallace, D, Finkelstein, A & Nealen, A 2017, Simulating strategy and dexterity for puzzle games. in 2017 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games, CIG 2017., 8080427, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp. 142-149, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games, CIG 2017, New York, United States, 8/22/17. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIG.2017.8080427
    Isaksen A, Wallace D, Finkelstein A, Nealen A. Simulating strategy and dexterity for puzzle games. In 2017 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games, CIG 2017. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2017. p. 142-149. 8080427 https://doi.org/10.1109/CIG.2017.8080427
    Isaksen, Aaron ; Wallace, Drew ; Finkelstein, Adam ; Nealen, Andrew. / Simulating strategy and dexterity for puzzle games. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games, CIG 2017. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2017. pp. 142-149
    @inproceedings{47b7c366cbd74bb882fce2594e0d80c3,
    title = "Simulating strategy and dexterity for puzzle games",
    abstract = "We examine the impact of strategy and dexterity on video games in which a player must use strategy to decide between multiple moves and must use dexterity to correctly execute those moves. We run simulation experiments on variants of two popular, interactive puzzle games: Tetris, which exhibits dexterity in the form of speed-accuracy time pressure, and Puzzle Bobble, which requires precise aiming. By modeling dexterity and strategy as separate components, we quantify the effect of each type of difficulty using normalized mean score and artificial intelligence agents that make human-like errors. We show how these techniques can model and visualize dexterity and strategy requirements as well as the effect of scoring systems on expressive range.",
    keywords = "AI-assisted game design, Automated play testing, Dexterity, Difficulty, Strategy",
    author = "Aaron Isaksen and Drew Wallace and Adam Finkelstein and Andrew Nealen",
    year = "2017",
    month = "10",
    day = "23",
    doi = "10.1109/CIG.2017.8080427",
    language = "English (US)",
    pages = "142--149",
    booktitle = "2017 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games, CIG 2017",
    publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
    address = "United States",

    }

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Simulating strategy and dexterity for puzzle games

    AU - Isaksen, Aaron

    AU - Wallace, Drew

    AU - Finkelstein, Adam

    AU - Nealen, Andrew

    PY - 2017/10/23

    Y1 - 2017/10/23

    N2 - We examine the impact of strategy and dexterity on video games in which a player must use strategy to decide between multiple moves and must use dexterity to correctly execute those moves. We run simulation experiments on variants of two popular, interactive puzzle games: Tetris, which exhibits dexterity in the form of speed-accuracy time pressure, and Puzzle Bobble, which requires precise aiming. By modeling dexterity and strategy as separate components, we quantify the effect of each type of difficulty using normalized mean score and artificial intelligence agents that make human-like errors. We show how these techniques can model and visualize dexterity and strategy requirements as well as the effect of scoring systems on expressive range.

    AB - We examine the impact of strategy and dexterity on video games in which a player must use strategy to decide between multiple moves and must use dexterity to correctly execute those moves. We run simulation experiments on variants of two popular, interactive puzzle games: Tetris, which exhibits dexterity in the form of speed-accuracy time pressure, and Puzzle Bobble, which requires precise aiming. By modeling dexterity and strategy as separate components, we quantify the effect of each type of difficulty using normalized mean score and artificial intelligence agents that make human-like errors. We show how these techniques can model and visualize dexterity and strategy requirements as well as the effect of scoring systems on expressive range.

    KW - AI-assisted game design

    KW - Automated play testing

    KW - Dexterity

    KW - Difficulty

    KW - Strategy

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040007154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040007154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1109/CIG.2017.8080427

    DO - 10.1109/CIG.2017.8080427

    M3 - Conference contribution

    SP - 142

    EP - 149

    BT - 2017 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games, CIG 2017

    PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

    ER -