Simplifying children's Medicaid and SCHIP: What helps? What hurts? What's next for the states?

Karl Kronebusch, Brian D. Elbel

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

The states have implemented the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) in a variety of ways. We describe these choices and estimate the resulting enrollment impacts. Many widely adopted policies, including mail-in applications and twelve-month continuous eligibility, have had limited impacts. Other policies that increase enrollment, including presumptive eligibility and self-declaration of income, have not been widely adopted. SCHIP programs administered as Medicaid expansions have been more successful in enrolling children than either separate SCHIP plans or combination programs. Waiting periods, premiums, and welfare reform have had important negative impacts on children's program enrollment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)233-246
Number of pages14
JournalHealth Affairs
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2004

Fingerprint

Medicaid
Postal Service
Children's Health Insurance Program

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Simplifying children's Medicaid and SCHIP : What helps? What hurts? What's next for the states? / Kronebusch, Karl; Elbel, Brian D.

In: Health Affairs, Vol. 23, No. 3, 05.2004, p. 233-246.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{6b2dee5d8a0f4b6a87705a651050100e,
title = "Simplifying children's Medicaid and SCHIP: What helps? What hurts? What's next for the states?",
abstract = "The states have implemented the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) in a variety of ways. We describe these choices and estimate the resulting enrollment impacts. Many widely adopted policies, including mail-in applications and twelve-month continuous eligibility, have had limited impacts. Other policies that increase enrollment, including presumptive eligibility and self-declaration of income, have not been widely adopted. SCHIP programs administered as Medicaid expansions have been more successful in enrolling children than either separate SCHIP plans or combination programs. Waiting periods, premiums, and welfare reform have had important negative impacts on children's program enrollment.",
author = "Karl Kronebusch and Elbel, {Brian D.}",
year = "2004",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1377/hlthaff.23.3.233",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "233--246",
journal = "Health Affairs",
issn = "0278-2715",
publisher = "Project Hope",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Simplifying children's Medicaid and SCHIP

T2 - What helps? What hurts? What's next for the states?

AU - Kronebusch, Karl

AU - Elbel, Brian D.

PY - 2004/5

Y1 - 2004/5

N2 - The states have implemented the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) in a variety of ways. We describe these choices and estimate the resulting enrollment impacts. Many widely adopted policies, including mail-in applications and twelve-month continuous eligibility, have had limited impacts. Other policies that increase enrollment, including presumptive eligibility and self-declaration of income, have not been widely adopted. SCHIP programs administered as Medicaid expansions have been more successful in enrolling children than either separate SCHIP plans or combination programs. Waiting periods, premiums, and welfare reform have had important negative impacts on children's program enrollment.

AB - The states have implemented the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) in a variety of ways. We describe these choices and estimate the resulting enrollment impacts. Many widely adopted policies, including mail-in applications and twelve-month continuous eligibility, have had limited impacts. Other policies that increase enrollment, including presumptive eligibility and self-declaration of income, have not been widely adopted. SCHIP programs administered as Medicaid expansions have been more successful in enrolling children than either separate SCHIP plans or combination programs. Waiting periods, premiums, and welfare reform have had important negative impacts on children's program enrollment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2442652906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2442652906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1377/hlthaff.23.3.233

DO - 10.1377/hlthaff.23.3.233

M3 - Review article

C2 - 15160822

AN - SCOPUS:2442652906

VL - 23

SP - 233

EP - 246

JO - Health Affairs

JF - Health Affairs

SN - 0278-2715

IS - 3

ER -