Simple approximations for the maximal transmission/disequilibrium test with a multi-allelic marker

Rebecca Betensky, D. Rabinowitz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Spielman et al. (1993) popularized the transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT) to test for linkage between disease and marker loci that show a population association. Several authors have proposed extensions to the TDT for multi-allelic markers. Many of these approaches exhibit a 'swamping' effect in which a marker with a strong effect is not detected by a global test that includes many markers with no effect. To avoid this effect, Schaid (1996) proposed using the maximum of the bi-allelic TDT statistics computed for each allele versus all others combined. The maximal TDT statistic, however, no longer follows a chi-square distribution. Here, a refinement to Bonferroni's correction for multiple testing provided by Worsley (1982) based on maximal spanning trees is applied to calculate accurate upper bounds for the type I error and p-values for the maximal TDT. In addition, an accurate lower Bonferroni bound is applied to calculate power. This approach does not require any simulation-based analysis and is less conservative than the standard Bonferroni correction. The bounds are given for both the exact probability calculations and for those based on the normal approximation. The results are assessed through simulations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)567-574
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Human Genetics
Volume64
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2000

Fingerprint

Chi-Square Distribution
Alleles
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Genetics(clinical)

Cite this

Simple approximations for the maximal transmission/disequilibrium test with a multi-allelic marker. / Betensky, Rebecca; Rabinowitz, D.

In: Annals of Human Genetics, Vol. 64, No. 6, 01.12.2000, p. 567-574.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6a197d7678094d6289788304572b380a,
title = "Simple approximations for the maximal transmission/disequilibrium test with a multi-allelic marker",
abstract = "Spielman et al. (1993) popularized the transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT) to test for linkage between disease and marker loci that show a population association. Several authors have proposed extensions to the TDT for multi-allelic markers. Many of these approaches exhibit a 'swamping' effect in which a marker with a strong effect is not detected by a global test that includes many markers with no effect. To avoid this effect, Schaid (1996) proposed using the maximum of the bi-allelic TDT statistics computed for each allele versus all others combined. The maximal TDT statistic, however, no longer follows a chi-square distribution. Here, a refinement to Bonferroni's correction for multiple testing provided by Worsley (1982) based on maximal spanning trees is applied to calculate accurate upper bounds for the type I error and p-values for the maximal TDT. In addition, an accurate lower Bonferroni bound is applied to calculate power. This approach does not require any simulation-based analysis and is less conservative than the standard Bonferroni correction. The bounds are given for both the exact probability calculations and for those based on the normal approximation. The results are assessed through simulations.",
author = "Rebecca Betensky and D. Rabinowitz",
year = "2000",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0003480000008356",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "567--574",
journal = "Annals of Human Genetics",
issn = "0003-4800",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Simple approximations for the maximal transmission/disequilibrium test with a multi-allelic marker

AU - Betensky, Rebecca

AU - Rabinowitz, D.

PY - 2000/12/1

Y1 - 2000/12/1

N2 - Spielman et al. (1993) popularized the transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT) to test for linkage between disease and marker loci that show a population association. Several authors have proposed extensions to the TDT for multi-allelic markers. Many of these approaches exhibit a 'swamping' effect in which a marker with a strong effect is not detected by a global test that includes many markers with no effect. To avoid this effect, Schaid (1996) proposed using the maximum of the bi-allelic TDT statistics computed for each allele versus all others combined. The maximal TDT statistic, however, no longer follows a chi-square distribution. Here, a refinement to Bonferroni's correction for multiple testing provided by Worsley (1982) based on maximal spanning trees is applied to calculate accurate upper bounds for the type I error and p-values for the maximal TDT. In addition, an accurate lower Bonferroni bound is applied to calculate power. This approach does not require any simulation-based analysis and is less conservative than the standard Bonferroni correction. The bounds are given for both the exact probability calculations and for those based on the normal approximation. The results are assessed through simulations.

AB - Spielman et al. (1993) popularized the transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT) to test for linkage between disease and marker loci that show a population association. Several authors have proposed extensions to the TDT for multi-allelic markers. Many of these approaches exhibit a 'swamping' effect in which a marker with a strong effect is not detected by a global test that includes many markers with no effect. To avoid this effect, Schaid (1996) proposed using the maximum of the bi-allelic TDT statistics computed for each allele versus all others combined. The maximal TDT statistic, however, no longer follows a chi-square distribution. Here, a refinement to Bonferroni's correction for multiple testing provided by Worsley (1982) based on maximal spanning trees is applied to calculate accurate upper bounds for the type I error and p-values for the maximal TDT. In addition, an accurate lower Bonferroni bound is applied to calculate power. This approach does not require any simulation-based analysis and is less conservative than the standard Bonferroni correction. The bounds are given for both the exact probability calculations and for those based on the normal approximation. The results are assessed through simulations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034470659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034470659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0003480000008356

DO - 10.1017/S0003480000008356

M3 - Article

C2 - 11281219

AN - SCOPUS:0034470659

VL - 64

SP - 567

EP - 574

JO - Annals of Human Genetics

JF - Annals of Human Genetics

SN - 0003-4800

IS - 6

ER -