Signal detection theory applied to three visual search tasks - Identification, yes/no detection and localization

E. Leslie Cameron, Joanna C. Tai, Miguel P. Eckstein, Marisa Carrasco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Adding distracters to a display impairs performance on visual tasks (i.e. the set-size effect). While keeping the display characteristics constant, we investigated this effect in three tasks: 2 target identification, yes-no detection with 2 targets, and 8-alternative localization. A Signal Detection Theory (SDT) model, tailored for each task, accounts for the set-size effects observed in identification and localization tasks, and slightly under-predicts the set-size effect in a detection task. Given that sensitivity varies as a function of spatial frequency (SF), we measured performance in each of these three tasks in neutral and peripheral precue conditions for each of six spatial frequencies (0.5-12 cpd). For all spatial frequencies tested, performance on the three tasks decreased as set size increased in the neutral precue condition, and the peripheral precue reduced the effect. Larger set-size effects were observed at low SFs in the identification and localization tasks. This effect can be described using the SDT model, but was not predicted by it. For each of these tasks we also established the extent to which covert attention modulates performance across a range of set sizes. A peripheral precue substantially diminished the set-size effect and improved performance, even at set size 1. These results provide support for distracter exclusion, and suggest that signal enhancement may also be a mechanism by which covert attention can impose its effect.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)295-325
Number of pages31
JournalSpatial Vision
Volume17
Issue number4-5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2004

Fingerprint

Signal detection
Display devices
Psychological Signal Detection

Keywords

  • Discrimination
  • Localization
  • Signal detection theory
  • Transient covert attention
  • Visual search
  • Yes/no detection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Signal detection theory applied to three visual search tasks - Identification, yes/no detection and localization. / Cameron, E. Leslie; Tai, Joanna C.; Eckstein, Miguel P.; Carrasco, Marisa.

In: Spatial Vision, Vol. 17, No. 4-5, 2004, p. 295-325.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cameron, E. Leslie ; Tai, Joanna C. ; Eckstein, Miguel P. ; Carrasco, Marisa. / Signal detection theory applied to three visual search tasks - Identification, yes/no detection and localization. In: Spatial Vision. 2004 ; Vol. 17, No. 4-5. pp. 295-325.
@article{89da069476e649a0be0a4e7b81a57ac2,
title = "Signal detection theory applied to three visual search tasks - Identification, yes/no detection and localization",
abstract = "Adding distracters to a display impairs performance on visual tasks (i.e. the set-size effect). While keeping the display characteristics constant, we investigated this effect in three tasks: 2 target identification, yes-no detection with 2 targets, and 8-alternative localization. A Signal Detection Theory (SDT) model, tailored for each task, accounts for the set-size effects observed in identification and localization tasks, and slightly under-predicts the set-size effect in a detection task. Given that sensitivity varies as a function of spatial frequency (SF), we measured performance in each of these three tasks in neutral and peripheral precue conditions for each of six spatial frequencies (0.5-12 cpd). For all spatial frequencies tested, performance on the three tasks decreased as set size increased in the neutral precue condition, and the peripheral precue reduced the effect. Larger set-size effects were observed at low SFs in the identification and localization tasks. This effect can be described using the SDT model, but was not predicted by it. For each of these tasks we also established the extent to which covert attention modulates performance across a range of set sizes. A peripheral precue substantially diminished the set-size effect and improved performance, even at set size 1. These results provide support for distracter exclusion, and suggest that signal enhancement may also be a mechanism by which covert attention can impose its effect.",
keywords = "Discrimination, Localization, Signal detection theory, Transient covert attention, Visual search, Yes/no detection",
author = "Cameron, {E. Leslie} and Tai, {Joanna C.} and Eckstein, {Miguel P.} and Marisa Carrasco",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1163/1568568041920212",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "295--325",
journal = "Multisensory research",
issn = "2213-4794",
publisher = "Brill",
number = "4-5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Signal detection theory applied to three visual search tasks - Identification, yes/no detection and localization

AU - Cameron, E. Leslie

AU - Tai, Joanna C.

AU - Eckstein, Miguel P.

AU - Carrasco, Marisa

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Adding distracters to a display impairs performance on visual tasks (i.e. the set-size effect). While keeping the display characteristics constant, we investigated this effect in three tasks: 2 target identification, yes-no detection with 2 targets, and 8-alternative localization. A Signal Detection Theory (SDT) model, tailored for each task, accounts for the set-size effects observed in identification and localization tasks, and slightly under-predicts the set-size effect in a detection task. Given that sensitivity varies as a function of spatial frequency (SF), we measured performance in each of these three tasks in neutral and peripheral precue conditions for each of six spatial frequencies (0.5-12 cpd). For all spatial frequencies tested, performance on the three tasks decreased as set size increased in the neutral precue condition, and the peripheral precue reduced the effect. Larger set-size effects were observed at low SFs in the identification and localization tasks. This effect can be described using the SDT model, but was not predicted by it. For each of these tasks we also established the extent to which covert attention modulates performance across a range of set sizes. A peripheral precue substantially diminished the set-size effect and improved performance, even at set size 1. These results provide support for distracter exclusion, and suggest that signal enhancement may also be a mechanism by which covert attention can impose its effect.

AB - Adding distracters to a display impairs performance on visual tasks (i.e. the set-size effect). While keeping the display characteristics constant, we investigated this effect in three tasks: 2 target identification, yes-no detection with 2 targets, and 8-alternative localization. A Signal Detection Theory (SDT) model, tailored for each task, accounts for the set-size effects observed in identification and localization tasks, and slightly under-predicts the set-size effect in a detection task. Given that sensitivity varies as a function of spatial frequency (SF), we measured performance in each of these three tasks in neutral and peripheral precue conditions for each of six spatial frequencies (0.5-12 cpd). For all spatial frequencies tested, performance on the three tasks decreased as set size increased in the neutral precue condition, and the peripheral precue reduced the effect. Larger set-size effects were observed at low SFs in the identification and localization tasks. This effect can be described using the SDT model, but was not predicted by it. For each of these tasks we also established the extent to which covert attention modulates performance across a range of set sizes. A peripheral precue substantially diminished the set-size effect and improved performance, even at set size 1. These results provide support for distracter exclusion, and suggest that signal enhancement may also be a mechanism by which covert attention can impose its effect.

KW - Discrimination

KW - Localization

KW - Signal detection theory

KW - Transient covert attention

KW - Visual search

KW - Yes/no detection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1842449665&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1842449665&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/1568568041920212

DO - 10.1163/1568568041920212

M3 - Article

C2 - 15559107

AN - SCOPUS:1842449665

VL - 17

SP - 295

EP - 325

JO - Multisensory research

JF - Multisensory research

SN - 2213-4794

IS - 4-5

ER -