Sicily statement on classification and development of evidence-based practice learning assessment tools

Julie K. Tilson, Sandra L. Kaplan, Janet L. Harris, Andy Hutchinson, Dragan Ilic, Richard Niederman, Jarmila Potomkova, Sandra E. Zwolsman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Teaching the steps of evidence-based practice (EBP) has become standard curriculum for health professions at both student and professional levels. Determining the best methods for evaluating EBP learning is hampered by a dearth of valid and practical assessment tools and by the absence of guidelines for classifying the purpose of those that exist. Conceived and developed by delegates of the Fifth International Conference of Evidence-Based Health Care Teachers and Developers, the aim of this statement is to provide guidance for purposeful classification and development of tools to assess EBP learning. Discussion. This paper identifies key principles for designing EBP learning assessment tools, recommends a common taxonomy for new and existing tools, and presents the Classification Rubric for EBP Assessment Tools in Education (CREATE) framework for classifying such tools. Recommendations are provided for developers of EBP learning assessments and priorities are suggested for the types of assessments that are needed. Examples place existing EBP assessments into the CREATE framework to demonstrate how a common taxonomy might facilitate purposeful development and use of EBP learning assessment tools. Summary. The widespread adoption of EBP into professional education requires valid and reliable measures of learning. Limited tools exist with established psychometrics. This international consensus statement strives to provide direction for developers of new EBP learning assessment tools and a framework for classifying the purposes of such tools.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number78
JournalBMC Medical Education
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Sicily
Evidence-Based Practice
Learning
learning
evidence
taxonomy
Education
education
Professional Education
Health Occupations
Psychometrics
Curriculum
psychometrics
Consensus
Teaching

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Sicily statement on classification and development of evidence-based practice learning assessment tools. / Tilson, Julie K.; Kaplan, Sandra L.; Harris, Janet L.; Hutchinson, Andy; Ilic, Dragan; Niederman, Richard; Potomkova, Jarmila; Zwolsman, Sandra E.

In: BMC Medical Education, Vol. 11, No. 1, 78, 2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tilson, JK, Kaplan, SL, Harris, JL, Hutchinson, A, Ilic, D, Niederman, R, Potomkova, J & Zwolsman, SE 2011, 'Sicily statement on classification and development of evidence-based practice learning assessment tools', BMC Medical Education, vol. 11, no. 1, 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-78
Tilson, Julie K. ; Kaplan, Sandra L. ; Harris, Janet L. ; Hutchinson, Andy ; Ilic, Dragan ; Niederman, Richard ; Potomkova, Jarmila ; Zwolsman, Sandra E. / Sicily statement on classification and development of evidence-based practice learning assessment tools. In: BMC Medical Education. 2011 ; Vol. 11, No. 1.
@article{96a8dae4aacb423aa8f39329ae087294,
title = "Sicily statement on classification and development of evidence-based practice learning assessment tools",
abstract = "Background: Teaching the steps of evidence-based practice (EBP) has become standard curriculum for health professions at both student and professional levels. Determining the best methods for evaluating EBP learning is hampered by a dearth of valid and practical assessment tools and by the absence of guidelines for classifying the purpose of those that exist. Conceived and developed by delegates of the Fifth International Conference of Evidence-Based Health Care Teachers and Developers, the aim of this statement is to provide guidance for purposeful classification and development of tools to assess EBP learning. Discussion. This paper identifies key principles for designing EBP learning assessment tools, recommends a common taxonomy for new and existing tools, and presents the Classification Rubric for EBP Assessment Tools in Education (CREATE) framework for classifying such tools. Recommendations are provided for developers of EBP learning assessments and priorities are suggested for the types of assessments that are needed. Examples place existing EBP assessments into the CREATE framework to demonstrate how a common taxonomy might facilitate purposeful development and use of EBP learning assessment tools. Summary. The widespread adoption of EBP into professional education requires valid and reliable measures of learning. Limited tools exist with established psychometrics. This international consensus statement strives to provide direction for developers of new EBP learning assessment tools and a framework for classifying the purposes of such tools.",
author = "Tilson, {Julie K.} and Kaplan, {Sandra L.} and Harris, {Janet L.} and Andy Hutchinson and Dragan Ilic and Richard Niederman and Jarmila Potomkova and Zwolsman, {Sandra E.}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1186/1472-6920-11-78",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
journal = "BMC Medical Education",
issn = "1472-6920",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sicily statement on classification and development of evidence-based practice learning assessment tools

AU - Tilson, Julie K.

AU - Kaplan, Sandra L.

AU - Harris, Janet L.

AU - Hutchinson, Andy

AU - Ilic, Dragan

AU - Niederman, Richard

AU - Potomkova, Jarmila

AU - Zwolsman, Sandra E.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Background: Teaching the steps of evidence-based practice (EBP) has become standard curriculum for health professions at both student and professional levels. Determining the best methods for evaluating EBP learning is hampered by a dearth of valid and practical assessment tools and by the absence of guidelines for classifying the purpose of those that exist. Conceived and developed by delegates of the Fifth International Conference of Evidence-Based Health Care Teachers and Developers, the aim of this statement is to provide guidance for purposeful classification and development of tools to assess EBP learning. Discussion. This paper identifies key principles for designing EBP learning assessment tools, recommends a common taxonomy for new and existing tools, and presents the Classification Rubric for EBP Assessment Tools in Education (CREATE) framework for classifying such tools. Recommendations are provided for developers of EBP learning assessments and priorities are suggested for the types of assessments that are needed. Examples place existing EBP assessments into the CREATE framework to demonstrate how a common taxonomy might facilitate purposeful development and use of EBP learning assessment tools. Summary. The widespread adoption of EBP into professional education requires valid and reliable measures of learning. Limited tools exist with established psychometrics. This international consensus statement strives to provide direction for developers of new EBP learning assessment tools and a framework for classifying the purposes of such tools.

AB - Background: Teaching the steps of evidence-based practice (EBP) has become standard curriculum for health professions at both student and professional levels. Determining the best methods for evaluating EBP learning is hampered by a dearth of valid and practical assessment tools and by the absence of guidelines for classifying the purpose of those that exist. Conceived and developed by delegates of the Fifth International Conference of Evidence-Based Health Care Teachers and Developers, the aim of this statement is to provide guidance for purposeful classification and development of tools to assess EBP learning. Discussion. This paper identifies key principles for designing EBP learning assessment tools, recommends a common taxonomy for new and existing tools, and presents the Classification Rubric for EBP Assessment Tools in Education (CREATE) framework for classifying such tools. Recommendations are provided for developers of EBP learning assessments and priorities are suggested for the types of assessments that are needed. Examples place existing EBP assessments into the CREATE framework to demonstrate how a common taxonomy might facilitate purposeful development and use of EBP learning assessment tools. Summary. The widespread adoption of EBP into professional education requires valid and reliable measures of learning. Limited tools exist with established psychometrics. This international consensus statement strives to provide direction for developers of new EBP learning assessment tools and a framework for classifying the purposes of such tools.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053484565&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053484565&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1472-6920-11-78

DO - 10.1186/1472-6920-11-78

M3 - Article

C2 - 21970731

AN - SCOPUS:80053484565

VL - 11

JO - BMC Medical Education

JF - BMC Medical Education

SN - 1472-6920

IS - 1

M1 - 78

ER -