Shortchanged? An assessment of chronic disease programming in major US city health departments

Mari Georgeson, Lorna Thorpe, Mario Merlino, Thomas R. Frieden, Jonathan E. Fielding, John M. Auerbach, Peter Beilenson, Matthew Carroll, Mary Des Vignes-Kendrick, John F. Domzalski, Franklin Judson, Mitchell H. Katz, Alonzo Plough, Eleni Sfakianaki, Adewale Troutman, Jonathan B. Weisbuch, Judith West, John L. Wilhelm, Steve Wilson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A self-administered survey was distributed to members of The Big Cities Health Coalition, a group of Health Officers/Commissioners from 17 of the largest US metropolitan health departments. The survey asked participants about their chronic disease priorities, data sources, budgets, and funding sources as well as examples of successful chronic disease interventions. Members of the Coalition discussed the survey results in a scheduled conference call. Chronic diseases account for 70% of all deaths nationwide on average, yet the health departments surveyed allocated an average of 1.85% of their budgets to chronic disease. Average chronic disease spending per inhabitant was $2.33, with a median of $1.56. Among the group's top chronic disease priorities were asthma, diabetes, tobacco, cancer, and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Nearly half of the group's chronic disease spending was on tobacco. Chronic disease funding sources varied across localities, but direct federal funding was minimal. In 14 cities serving a combined 37 million people (13% of the US population), direct federal chronic disease funding totaled $8.7 million, an average of $0.24 per capita. The group described successful chronic disease interventions, particularly related to tobacco and asthma.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)183-190
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Urban Health
Volume82
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Chronic Disease
programming
Disease
Health
health
funding
Tobacco
nicotine
Budgets
coalition
Asthma
budget
Group
Information Storage and Retrieval
chronic illness
inhabitant
Cardiovascular Diseases
cancer
death
Population

Keywords

  • Chronic disease
  • Funding
  • Public health practice
  • Urban health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Georgeson, M., Thorpe, L., Merlino, M., Frieden, T. R., Fielding, J. E., Auerbach, J. M., ... Wilson, S. (2005). Shortchanged? An assessment of chronic disease programming in major US city health departments. Journal of Urban Health, 82(2), 183-190. https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/jti042

Shortchanged? An assessment of chronic disease programming in major US city health departments. / Georgeson, Mari; Thorpe, Lorna; Merlino, Mario; Frieden, Thomas R.; Fielding, Jonathan E.; Auerbach, John M.; Beilenson, Peter; Carroll, Matthew; Des Vignes-Kendrick, Mary; Domzalski, John F.; Judson, Franklin; Katz, Mitchell H.; Plough, Alonzo; Sfakianaki, Eleni; Troutman, Adewale; Weisbuch, Jonathan B.; West, Judith; Wilhelm, John L.; Wilson, Steve.

In: Journal of Urban Health, Vol. 82, No. 2, 2005, p. 183-190.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Georgeson, M, Thorpe, L, Merlino, M, Frieden, TR, Fielding, JE, Auerbach, JM, Beilenson, P, Carroll, M, Des Vignes-Kendrick, M, Domzalski, JF, Judson, F, Katz, MH, Plough, A, Sfakianaki, E, Troutman, A, Weisbuch, JB, West, J, Wilhelm, JL & Wilson, S 2005, 'Shortchanged? An assessment of chronic disease programming in major US city health departments', Journal of Urban Health, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 183-190. https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/jti042
Georgeson, Mari ; Thorpe, Lorna ; Merlino, Mario ; Frieden, Thomas R. ; Fielding, Jonathan E. ; Auerbach, John M. ; Beilenson, Peter ; Carroll, Matthew ; Des Vignes-Kendrick, Mary ; Domzalski, John F. ; Judson, Franklin ; Katz, Mitchell H. ; Plough, Alonzo ; Sfakianaki, Eleni ; Troutman, Adewale ; Weisbuch, Jonathan B. ; West, Judith ; Wilhelm, John L. ; Wilson, Steve. / Shortchanged? An assessment of chronic disease programming in major US city health departments. In: Journal of Urban Health. 2005 ; Vol. 82, No. 2. pp. 183-190.
@article{9109b94f122f4de7925d506ede36a7cf,
title = "Shortchanged? An assessment of chronic disease programming in major US city health departments",
abstract = "A self-administered survey was distributed to members of The Big Cities Health Coalition, a group of Health Officers/Commissioners from 17 of the largest US metropolitan health departments. The survey asked participants about their chronic disease priorities, data sources, budgets, and funding sources as well as examples of successful chronic disease interventions. Members of the Coalition discussed the survey results in a scheduled conference call. Chronic diseases account for 70{\%} of all deaths nationwide on average, yet the health departments surveyed allocated an average of 1.85{\%} of their budgets to chronic disease. Average chronic disease spending per inhabitant was $2.33, with a median of $1.56. Among the group's top chronic disease priorities were asthma, diabetes, tobacco, cancer, and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Nearly half of the group's chronic disease spending was on tobacco. Chronic disease funding sources varied across localities, but direct federal funding was minimal. In 14 cities serving a combined 37 million people (13{\%} of the US population), direct federal chronic disease funding totaled $8.7 million, an average of $0.24 per capita. The group described successful chronic disease interventions, particularly related to tobacco and asthma.",
keywords = "Chronic disease, Funding, Public health practice, Urban health",
author = "Mari Georgeson and Lorna Thorpe and Mario Merlino and Frieden, {Thomas R.} and Fielding, {Jonathan E.} and Auerbach, {John M.} and Peter Beilenson and Matthew Carroll and {Des Vignes-Kendrick}, Mary and Domzalski, {John F.} and Franklin Judson and Katz, {Mitchell H.} and Alonzo Plough and Eleni Sfakianaki and Adewale Troutman and Weisbuch, {Jonathan B.} and Judith West and Wilhelm, {John L.} and Steve Wilson",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1093/jurban/jti042",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "183--190",
journal = "Journal of Urban Health",
issn = "1099-3460",
publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Shortchanged? An assessment of chronic disease programming in major US city health departments

AU - Georgeson, Mari

AU - Thorpe, Lorna

AU - Merlino, Mario

AU - Frieden, Thomas R.

AU - Fielding, Jonathan E.

AU - Auerbach, John M.

AU - Beilenson, Peter

AU - Carroll, Matthew

AU - Des Vignes-Kendrick, Mary

AU - Domzalski, John F.

AU - Judson, Franklin

AU - Katz, Mitchell H.

AU - Plough, Alonzo

AU - Sfakianaki, Eleni

AU - Troutman, Adewale

AU - Weisbuch, Jonathan B.

AU - West, Judith

AU - Wilhelm, John L.

AU - Wilson, Steve

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - A self-administered survey was distributed to members of The Big Cities Health Coalition, a group of Health Officers/Commissioners from 17 of the largest US metropolitan health departments. The survey asked participants about their chronic disease priorities, data sources, budgets, and funding sources as well as examples of successful chronic disease interventions. Members of the Coalition discussed the survey results in a scheduled conference call. Chronic diseases account for 70% of all deaths nationwide on average, yet the health departments surveyed allocated an average of 1.85% of their budgets to chronic disease. Average chronic disease spending per inhabitant was $2.33, with a median of $1.56. Among the group's top chronic disease priorities were asthma, diabetes, tobacco, cancer, and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Nearly half of the group's chronic disease spending was on tobacco. Chronic disease funding sources varied across localities, but direct federal funding was minimal. In 14 cities serving a combined 37 million people (13% of the US population), direct federal chronic disease funding totaled $8.7 million, an average of $0.24 per capita. The group described successful chronic disease interventions, particularly related to tobacco and asthma.

AB - A self-administered survey was distributed to members of The Big Cities Health Coalition, a group of Health Officers/Commissioners from 17 of the largest US metropolitan health departments. The survey asked participants about their chronic disease priorities, data sources, budgets, and funding sources as well as examples of successful chronic disease interventions. Members of the Coalition discussed the survey results in a scheduled conference call. Chronic diseases account for 70% of all deaths nationwide on average, yet the health departments surveyed allocated an average of 1.85% of their budgets to chronic disease. Average chronic disease spending per inhabitant was $2.33, with a median of $1.56. Among the group's top chronic disease priorities were asthma, diabetes, tobacco, cancer, and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Nearly half of the group's chronic disease spending was on tobacco. Chronic disease funding sources varied across localities, but direct federal funding was minimal. In 14 cities serving a combined 37 million people (13% of the US population), direct federal chronic disease funding totaled $8.7 million, an average of $0.24 per capita. The group described successful chronic disease interventions, particularly related to tobacco and asthma.

KW - Chronic disease

KW - Funding

KW - Public health practice

KW - Urban health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=24044462374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=24044462374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jurban/jti042

DO - 10.1093/jurban/jti042

M3 - Article

C2 - 15890761

AN - SCOPUS:24044462374

VL - 82

SP - 183

EP - 190

JO - Journal of Urban Health

JF - Journal of Urban Health

SN - 1099-3460

IS - 2

ER -