Short-circuiting transference using implementation intentions

Elizabeth Przybylinski, Susan Andersen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Prior relationships readily play out in present ones, often without awareness and even when problematic for an individual, and yet little is known about how individuals might be able to prevent this influence, if at all. The social-cognitive process of transference is a mechanism by which past relationships emerge in the present, i.e., through the relatively automatic use of significant-other (SO) representations in judging and remembering others. Two experiments tested the hypothesis that this process can be strategically regulated by the use of implementation intentions, which can automatize desired goal pursuit. Participants motivated to prevent transference learned about three individuals, one subtly resembling their own SO, and were provided either with no-additional strategy or with a goal intention to prevent transference, or crucially, with an implementation intention to prevent it. Across both experiments, the evidence strongly supported our hypothesis. Response latencies in a primed lexical decision task showed that, regardless of strategy, the SO representation was activated with the relevant new person, and yet, in terms of recognition memory, only those participants in the no-additional strategy and the goal-intention conditions showed the transference effect-i.e., the application of the knowledge that was activated by SO-resemblance. As predicted, those randomly assigned to the implementation-intention condition did not. In short, participants in the implementation-intention condition effectively prevented transference. The experiments provide the first evidence we know of that individuals can be trained to use a regulation strategy with which to effectively regulate transference, when needed, using a strategy that itself can be relatively automatic.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2012

Fingerprint

transference
experiment
present
Reaction Time
evidence
Transference (Psychology)
regulation
human being

Keywords

  • Goal conflict
  • Relationship
  • Self-regulation
  • Significant other
  • Social perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Short-circuiting transference using implementation intentions. / Przybylinski, Elizabeth; Andersen, Susan.

In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d6612be9e3c34642975de3b91c153950,
title = "Short-circuiting transference using implementation intentions",
abstract = "Prior relationships readily play out in present ones, often without awareness and even when problematic for an individual, and yet little is known about how individuals might be able to prevent this influence, if at all. The social-cognitive process of transference is a mechanism by which past relationships emerge in the present, i.e., through the relatively automatic use of significant-other (SO) representations in judging and remembering others. Two experiments tested the hypothesis that this process can be strategically regulated by the use of implementation intentions, which can automatize desired goal pursuit. Participants motivated to prevent transference learned about three individuals, one subtly resembling their own SO, and were provided either with no-additional strategy or with a goal intention to prevent transference, or crucially, with an implementation intention to prevent it. Across both experiments, the evidence strongly supported our hypothesis. Response latencies in a primed lexical decision task showed that, regardless of strategy, the SO representation was activated with the relevant new person, and yet, in terms of recognition memory, only those participants in the no-additional strategy and the goal-intention conditions showed the transference effect-i.e., the application of the knowledge that was activated by SO-resemblance. As predicted, those randomly assigned to the implementation-intention condition did not. In short, participants in the implementation-intention condition effectively prevented transference. The experiments provide the first evidence we know of that individuals can be trained to use a regulation strategy with which to effectively regulate transference, when needed, using a strategy that itself can be relatively automatic.",
keywords = "Goal conflict, Relationship, Self-regulation, Significant other, Social perception",
author = "Elizabeth Przybylinski and Susan Andersen",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1016/j.jesp.2012.09.003",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-1031",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Short-circuiting transference using implementation intentions

AU - Przybylinski, Elizabeth

AU - Andersen, Susan

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Prior relationships readily play out in present ones, often without awareness and even when problematic for an individual, and yet little is known about how individuals might be able to prevent this influence, if at all. The social-cognitive process of transference is a mechanism by which past relationships emerge in the present, i.e., through the relatively automatic use of significant-other (SO) representations in judging and remembering others. Two experiments tested the hypothesis that this process can be strategically regulated by the use of implementation intentions, which can automatize desired goal pursuit. Participants motivated to prevent transference learned about three individuals, one subtly resembling their own SO, and were provided either with no-additional strategy or with a goal intention to prevent transference, or crucially, with an implementation intention to prevent it. Across both experiments, the evidence strongly supported our hypothesis. Response latencies in a primed lexical decision task showed that, regardless of strategy, the SO representation was activated with the relevant new person, and yet, in terms of recognition memory, only those participants in the no-additional strategy and the goal-intention conditions showed the transference effect-i.e., the application of the knowledge that was activated by SO-resemblance. As predicted, those randomly assigned to the implementation-intention condition did not. In short, participants in the implementation-intention condition effectively prevented transference. The experiments provide the first evidence we know of that individuals can be trained to use a regulation strategy with which to effectively regulate transference, when needed, using a strategy that itself can be relatively automatic.

AB - Prior relationships readily play out in present ones, often without awareness and even when problematic for an individual, and yet little is known about how individuals might be able to prevent this influence, if at all. The social-cognitive process of transference is a mechanism by which past relationships emerge in the present, i.e., through the relatively automatic use of significant-other (SO) representations in judging and remembering others. Two experiments tested the hypothesis that this process can be strategically regulated by the use of implementation intentions, which can automatize desired goal pursuit. Participants motivated to prevent transference learned about three individuals, one subtly resembling their own SO, and were provided either with no-additional strategy or with a goal intention to prevent transference, or crucially, with an implementation intention to prevent it. Across both experiments, the evidence strongly supported our hypothesis. Response latencies in a primed lexical decision task showed that, regardless of strategy, the SO representation was activated with the relevant new person, and yet, in terms of recognition memory, only those participants in the no-additional strategy and the goal-intention conditions showed the transference effect-i.e., the application of the knowledge that was activated by SO-resemblance. As predicted, those randomly assigned to the implementation-intention condition did not. In short, participants in the implementation-intention condition effectively prevented transference. The experiments provide the first evidence we know of that individuals can be trained to use a regulation strategy with which to effectively regulate transference, when needed, using a strategy that itself can be relatively automatic.

KW - Goal conflict

KW - Relationship

KW - Self-regulation

KW - Significant other

KW - Social perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867235885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867235885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.09.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.09.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84867235885

JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

SN - 0022-1031

ER -