Sexual boundary violations

An agenda demanding more consideration

Arlene Lu Steinberg, Judith Alpert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The 13 articles raise some very interesting issues, which clearly need more consideration. In addition, several authors made specific suggestions. In the first part of the present article, we consider these issues as well as some observations, questions, and issues demanding more consideration. The second part of this last article is "vignette driven." For the purposes of this concluding chapter we developed 3 vignettes, focusing on analyst-analysand contact posttreatment, analyst-analysand sexual contact posttreatment, and analyst-analysand physical contact during treatment. We asked a few contributing senior analysts who have been studying sexual boundary violations over time to respond to these vignettes. The independent (from each other) responses of analysts Andrea Celenza, Muriel Dimen with Charles Amrhein, and Barbara Pizer are included here and discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)221-225
Number of pages5
JournalPsychoanalytic Psychology
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2017

Keywords

  • Analytic relationship
  • Sexual boundary violations
  • Trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Sexual boundary violations : An agenda demanding more consideration. / Steinberg, Arlene Lu; Alpert, Judith.

In: Psychoanalytic Psychology, Vol. 34, No. 2, 01.04.2017, p. 221-225.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e14895bc224b474f9af386099eca772e,
title = "Sexual boundary violations: An agenda demanding more consideration",
abstract = "The 13 articles raise some very interesting issues, which clearly need more consideration. In addition, several authors made specific suggestions. In the first part of the present article, we consider these issues as well as some observations, questions, and issues demanding more consideration. The second part of this last article is {"}vignette driven.{"} For the purposes of this concluding chapter we developed 3 vignettes, focusing on analyst-analysand contact posttreatment, analyst-analysand sexual contact posttreatment, and analyst-analysand physical contact during treatment. We asked a few contributing senior analysts who have been studying sexual boundary violations over time to respond to these vignettes. The independent (from each other) responses of analysts Andrea Celenza, Muriel Dimen with Charles Amrhein, and Barbara Pizer are included here and discussed.",
keywords = "Analytic relationship, Sexual boundary violations, Trauma",
author = "Steinberg, {Arlene Lu} and Judith Alpert",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/pap0000105",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "221--225",
journal = "Psychoanalytic Psychology",
issn = "0736-9735",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sexual boundary violations

T2 - An agenda demanding more consideration

AU - Steinberg, Arlene Lu

AU - Alpert, Judith

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - The 13 articles raise some very interesting issues, which clearly need more consideration. In addition, several authors made specific suggestions. In the first part of the present article, we consider these issues as well as some observations, questions, and issues demanding more consideration. The second part of this last article is "vignette driven." For the purposes of this concluding chapter we developed 3 vignettes, focusing on analyst-analysand contact posttreatment, analyst-analysand sexual contact posttreatment, and analyst-analysand physical contact during treatment. We asked a few contributing senior analysts who have been studying sexual boundary violations over time to respond to these vignettes. The independent (from each other) responses of analysts Andrea Celenza, Muriel Dimen with Charles Amrhein, and Barbara Pizer are included here and discussed.

AB - The 13 articles raise some very interesting issues, which clearly need more consideration. In addition, several authors made specific suggestions. In the first part of the present article, we consider these issues as well as some observations, questions, and issues demanding more consideration. The second part of this last article is "vignette driven." For the purposes of this concluding chapter we developed 3 vignettes, focusing on analyst-analysand contact posttreatment, analyst-analysand sexual contact posttreatment, and analyst-analysand physical contact during treatment. We asked a few contributing senior analysts who have been studying sexual boundary violations over time to respond to these vignettes. The independent (from each other) responses of analysts Andrea Celenza, Muriel Dimen with Charles Amrhein, and Barbara Pizer are included here and discussed.

KW - Analytic relationship

KW - Sexual boundary violations

KW - Trauma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017386893&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017386893&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/pap0000105

DO - 10.1037/pap0000105

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 221

EP - 225

JO - Psychoanalytic Psychology

JF - Psychoanalytic Psychology

SN - 0736-9735

IS - 2

ER -