Sex typing and androgyny in dyadic interaction: Individual differences in responsiveness to physical attractiveness

Susan Andersen, Sandra L. Bem

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In an expansion of the "behavioral confirmation" paradigm developed by M. Snyder et al, 12 sex-typed and 12 androgynous (Bem Sex-Role Inventory) undergraduates of each sex engaged in getting-acquainted telephone conversations with allegedly attractive and unattractive members of their own and the opposite sex. Although females were more socially responsive than males, the sexes neither differed in their responsiveness to physical attractiveness nor in their responsiveness to cross-sex and same-sex interaction. As hypothesized, sex-typed individuals were rated by blind judges as being significantly more responsive toward allegedly attractive than unattractive partners. In contrast, androgynous men did not differentiate on the basis of physical attractiveness, and androgynous women actually led allegedly unattractive targets to be rated as more socially attractive than allegedly attractive targets, thereby disconfirming the physical attractiveness stereotype. Because cultural definitions of physical attractiveness are different for men and women, results are discussed in the context of recent evidence that sex-typed individuals have a particular readiness to encode and organize information in terms of gender. (22 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)74-86
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1981

Fingerprint

social attraction
Individuality
interaction
telephone
stereotype
conversation
paradigm
gender
Telephone
evidence
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • sex typing & androgyny, individual differences in responsiveness to physical attractiveness of partner, male vs female dyads

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Sex typing and androgyny in dyadic interaction : Individual differences in responsiveness to physical attractiveness. / Andersen, Susan; Bem, Sandra L.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 41, No. 1, 07.1981, p. 74-86.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ac65388de0a4420c98d5bedf95d2dc99,
title = "Sex typing and androgyny in dyadic interaction: Individual differences in responsiveness to physical attractiveness",
abstract = "In an expansion of the {"}behavioral confirmation{"} paradigm developed by M. Snyder et al, 12 sex-typed and 12 androgynous (Bem Sex-Role Inventory) undergraduates of each sex engaged in getting-acquainted telephone conversations with allegedly attractive and unattractive members of their own and the opposite sex. Although females were more socially responsive than males, the sexes neither differed in their responsiveness to physical attractiveness nor in their responsiveness to cross-sex and same-sex interaction. As hypothesized, sex-typed individuals were rated by blind judges as being significantly more responsive toward allegedly attractive than unattractive partners. In contrast, androgynous men did not differentiate on the basis of physical attractiveness, and androgynous women actually led allegedly unattractive targets to be rated as more socially attractive than allegedly attractive targets, thereby disconfirming the physical attractiveness stereotype. Because cultural definitions of physical attractiveness are different for men and women, results are discussed in the context of recent evidence that sex-typed individuals have a particular readiness to encode and organize information in terms of gender. (22 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
keywords = "sex typing & androgyny, individual differences in responsiveness to physical attractiveness of partner, male vs female dyads",
author = "Susan Andersen and Bem, {Sandra L.}",
year = "1981",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1037//0022-3514.41.1.74",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "74--86",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sex typing and androgyny in dyadic interaction

T2 - Individual differences in responsiveness to physical attractiveness

AU - Andersen, Susan

AU - Bem, Sandra L.

PY - 1981/7

Y1 - 1981/7

N2 - In an expansion of the "behavioral confirmation" paradigm developed by M. Snyder et al, 12 sex-typed and 12 androgynous (Bem Sex-Role Inventory) undergraduates of each sex engaged in getting-acquainted telephone conversations with allegedly attractive and unattractive members of their own and the opposite sex. Although females were more socially responsive than males, the sexes neither differed in their responsiveness to physical attractiveness nor in their responsiveness to cross-sex and same-sex interaction. As hypothesized, sex-typed individuals were rated by blind judges as being significantly more responsive toward allegedly attractive than unattractive partners. In contrast, androgynous men did not differentiate on the basis of physical attractiveness, and androgynous women actually led allegedly unattractive targets to be rated as more socially attractive than allegedly attractive targets, thereby disconfirming the physical attractiveness stereotype. Because cultural definitions of physical attractiveness are different for men and women, results are discussed in the context of recent evidence that sex-typed individuals have a particular readiness to encode and organize information in terms of gender. (22 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - In an expansion of the "behavioral confirmation" paradigm developed by M. Snyder et al, 12 sex-typed and 12 androgynous (Bem Sex-Role Inventory) undergraduates of each sex engaged in getting-acquainted telephone conversations with allegedly attractive and unattractive members of their own and the opposite sex. Although females were more socially responsive than males, the sexes neither differed in their responsiveness to physical attractiveness nor in their responsiveness to cross-sex and same-sex interaction. As hypothesized, sex-typed individuals were rated by blind judges as being significantly more responsive toward allegedly attractive than unattractive partners. In contrast, androgynous men did not differentiate on the basis of physical attractiveness, and androgynous women actually led allegedly unattractive targets to be rated as more socially attractive than allegedly attractive targets, thereby disconfirming the physical attractiveness stereotype. Because cultural definitions of physical attractiveness are different for men and women, results are discussed in the context of recent evidence that sex-typed individuals have a particular readiness to encode and organize information in terms of gender. (22 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - sex typing & androgyny, individual differences in responsiveness to physical attractiveness of partner, male vs female dyads

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0002583071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0002583071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037//0022-3514.41.1.74

DO - 10.1037//0022-3514.41.1.74

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0002583071

VL - 41

SP - 74

EP - 86

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 1

ER -