Sex bias in evaluating nontraditional job applicants: Reactions to women and men's interrupted college attendance

May Ling Halim, Madeline Heilman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Two studies indicated that being a nontraditional job applicant due to voluntary interruption of college attendance had detrimental consequences for employment evaluation. These negative reactions were more severe for women than for men. Women with interrupted attendance received the most negative responses (Studies 1 and 2). Choosing to interrupt college attendance increased perceived instability and also positively affected perceived flexibility, and these characterizations were related to evaluative outcomes (Study 2). Moreover, both instability and flexibility characterizations contributed to the gender-discrepant consequences of interrupted college attendance. Female applicants were rated more negatively on flexibility characterizations than were male applicants. Furthermore, although there were no gender differences in ratings of instability, instability ratings were found to negatively impact evaluations of female applicants, but not male applicants.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2330-2340
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume43
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2013

Fingerprint

Sexism
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Sex bias in evaluating nontraditional job applicants : Reactions to women and men's interrupted college attendance. / Halim, May Ling; Heilman, Madeline.

In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 43, No. 11, 11.2013, p. 2330-2340.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a2ecaeb0330a436ba1c0b50f26cb2ec4,
title = "Sex bias in evaluating nontraditional job applicants: Reactions to women and men's interrupted college attendance",
abstract = "Two studies indicated that being a nontraditional job applicant due to voluntary interruption of college attendance had detrimental consequences for employment evaluation. These negative reactions were more severe for women than for men. Women with interrupted attendance received the most negative responses (Studies 1 and 2). Choosing to interrupt college attendance increased perceived instability and also positively affected perceived flexibility, and these characterizations were related to evaluative outcomes (Study 2). Moreover, both instability and flexibility characterizations contributed to the gender-discrepant consequences of interrupted college attendance. Female applicants were rated more negatively on flexibility characterizations than were male applicants. Furthermore, although there were no gender differences in ratings of instability, instability ratings were found to negatively impact evaluations of female applicants, but not male applicants.",
author = "Halim, {May Ling} and Madeline Heilman",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1111/jasp.12182",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "2330--2340",
journal = "Journal of Applied Social Psychology",
issn = "0021-9029",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sex bias in evaluating nontraditional job applicants

T2 - Reactions to women and men's interrupted college attendance

AU - Halim, May Ling

AU - Heilman, Madeline

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - Two studies indicated that being a nontraditional job applicant due to voluntary interruption of college attendance had detrimental consequences for employment evaluation. These negative reactions were more severe for women than for men. Women with interrupted attendance received the most negative responses (Studies 1 and 2). Choosing to interrupt college attendance increased perceived instability and also positively affected perceived flexibility, and these characterizations were related to evaluative outcomes (Study 2). Moreover, both instability and flexibility characterizations contributed to the gender-discrepant consequences of interrupted college attendance. Female applicants were rated more negatively on flexibility characterizations than were male applicants. Furthermore, although there were no gender differences in ratings of instability, instability ratings were found to negatively impact evaluations of female applicants, but not male applicants.

AB - Two studies indicated that being a nontraditional job applicant due to voluntary interruption of college attendance had detrimental consequences for employment evaluation. These negative reactions were more severe for women than for men. Women with interrupted attendance received the most negative responses (Studies 1 and 2). Choosing to interrupt college attendance increased perceived instability and also positively affected perceived flexibility, and these characterizations were related to evaluative outcomes (Study 2). Moreover, both instability and flexibility characterizations contributed to the gender-discrepant consequences of interrupted college attendance. Female applicants were rated more negatively on flexibility characterizations than were male applicants. Furthermore, although there were no gender differences in ratings of instability, instability ratings were found to negatively impact evaluations of female applicants, but not male applicants.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887610601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887610601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jasp.12182

DO - 10.1111/jasp.12182

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84887610601

VL - 43

SP - 2330

EP - 2340

JO - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

SN - 0021-9029

IS - 11

ER -