Setting the empirical record straight: Acceptability judgments appear to be reliable, robust, and replicable

Jon Sprouse, Diogo Almeida

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

Branigan & Pickering (B&P) advocate the use of syntactic priming to investigate linguistic representations and argue that it overcomes several purported deficiencies of acceptability judgments. While we recognize the merit of drawing attention to a potentially underexplored experimental methodology in language science, we do not believe that the empirical evidence supports B&P's claims about acceptability judgments. We present the relevant evidence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e311
JournalThe Behavioral and brain sciences
Volume40
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Linguistics
Language

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Physiology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Setting the empirical record straight : Acceptability judgments appear to be reliable, robust, and replicable. / Sprouse, Jon; Almeida, Diogo.

In: The Behavioral and brain sciences, Vol. 40, 01.01.2017, p. e311.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

@article{5653730bfb364d3d8f4b08ccef4bbf07,
title = "Setting the empirical record straight: Acceptability judgments appear to be reliable, robust, and replicable",
abstract = "Branigan & Pickering (B&P) advocate the use of syntactic priming to investigate linguistic representations and argue that it overcomes several purported deficiencies of acceptability judgments. While we recognize the merit of drawing attention to a potentially underexplored experimental methodology in language science, we do not believe that the empirical evidence supports B&P's claims about acceptability judgments. We present the relevant evidence.",
author = "Jon Sprouse and Diogo Almeida",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0140525X17000590",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "e311",
journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",
issn = "0140-525X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Setting the empirical record straight

T2 - Acceptability judgments appear to be reliable, robust, and replicable

AU - Sprouse, Jon

AU - Almeida, Diogo

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Branigan & Pickering (B&P) advocate the use of syntactic priming to investigate linguistic representations and argue that it overcomes several purported deficiencies of acceptability judgments. While we recognize the merit of drawing attention to a potentially underexplored experimental methodology in language science, we do not believe that the empirical evidence supports B&P's claims about acceptability judgments. We present the relevant evidence.

AB - Branigan & Pickering (B&P) advocate the use of syntactic priming to investigate linguistic representations and argue that it overcomes several purported deficiencies of acceptability judgments. While we recognize the merit of drawing attention to a potentially underexplored experimental methodology in language science, we do not believe that the empirical evidence supports B&P's claims about acceptability judgments. We present the relevant evidence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062993500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062993500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X17000590

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X17000590

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 29342740

AN - SCOPUS:85062993500

VL - 40

SP - e311

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

SN - 0140-525X

ER -