Setting an agenda for local action

The limits of expert opinion and community voice

Diana Silver, Beth Weitzman, Charles Brecher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Many social programs, funded by government or philanthropy, begin with efforts to improve local conditions with strategic planning. Mandated by funders, these processes aim to include the views of community residents and those with technical expertise. Program leaders are left to reconcile public and expert opinions in determining how to shape their programs. The experience of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Urban Health Initiative suggests that although consultation with experts and the public failed to reveal a clear assessment of the community's problems or their solutions, it did assist in engaging diverse groups. Despite this engagement, however, core leaders wielded substantial power in selecting the agenda.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)362-378
Number of pages17
JournalPolicy Studies Journal
Volume30
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

expert
leader
community
philanthropy
strategic planning
expertise
resident
health
programme
opinion
experience
Group
public
consultation
planning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration

Cite this

Setting an agenda for local action : The limits of expert opinion and community voice. / Silver, Diana; Weitzman, Beth; Brecher, Charles.

In: Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2002, p. 362-378.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{034dca28e26842ce8c352a71fa7a6014,
title = "Setting an agenda for local action: The limits of expert opinion and community voice",
abstract = "Many social programs, funded by government or philanthropy, begin with efforts to improve local conditions with strategic planning. Mandated by funders, these processes aim to include the views of community residents and those with technical expertise. Program leaders are left to reconcile public and expert opinions in determining how to shape their programs. The experience of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Urban Health Initiative suggests that although consultation with experts and the public failed to reveal a clear assessment of the community's problems or their solutions, it did assist in engaging diverse groups. Despite this engagement, however, core leaders wielded substantial power in selecting the agenda.",
author = "Diana Silver and Beth Weitzman and Charles Brecher",
year = "2002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "362--378",
journal = "Policy Studies Journal",
issn = "0190-292X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Setting an agenda for local action

T2 - The limits of expert opinion and community voice

AU - Silver, Diana

AU - Weitzman, Beth

AU - Brecher, Charles

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Many social programs, funded by government or philanthropy, begin with efforts to improve local conditions with strategic planning. Mandated by funders, these processes aim to include the views of community residents and those with technical expertise. Program leaders are left to reconcile public and expert opinions in determining how to shape their programs. The experience of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Urban Health Initiative suggests that although consultation with experts and the public failed to reveal a clear assessment of the community's problems or their solutions, it did assist in engaging diverse groups. Despite this engagement, however, core leaders wielded substantial power in selecting the agenda.

AB - Many social programs, funded by government or philanthropy, begin with efforts to improve local conditions with strategic planning. Mandated by funders, these processes aim to include the views of community residents and those with technical expertise. Program leaders are left to reconcile public and expert opinions in determining how to shape their programs. The experience of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Urban Health Initiative suggests that although consultation with experts and the public failed to reveal a clear assessment of the community's problems or their solutions, it did assist in engaging diverse groups. Despite this engagement, however, core leaders wielded substantial power in selecting the agenda.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0011583012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0011583012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 362

EP - 378

JO - Policy Studies Journal

JF - Policy Studies Journal

SN - 0190-292X

IS - 3

ER -