Sentence processing selectivity in Broca's area: evident for structure but not syntactic movement

Corianne Rogalsky, Diogo Almeida, Jon Sprouse, Gregory Hickok

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The role of Broca’s area in sentence processing is hotly debated. Hypotheses include that Broca’s area supports sentence comprehension via syntax-specific processes, hierarchical structure building, or working memory. Here we adopt a within-subject functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) approach using sentence-level contrasts and non-sentential comparison tasks to address these hypotheses. Standard syntactic movement distance effects were replicated, but no difference was found between movement and non-movement sentences in Broca's area in the group or consistently in the individual subject analyses. Group and individual results both identify Broca's area subregions that are selective for sentence structure. Group, but not individual subject results, suggest shared resources for sentence processing and articulation in Broca's area. We conclude that Broca’s area is not selectively processing syntactic movement, but that subregions are selectively responsive to sentence structure. Our findings reinforce Fedorenko and Kanwishser's call for individual subject analyses in Broca's area, as group findings can obscure selective responses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1326-1338
Number of pages13
JournalLanguage, Cognition and Neuroscience
Volume30
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 26 2015

Fingerprint

Group
Broca's Area
Syntactic Movement
Sentence Processing
Broca Area
Short-Term Memory
syntax
comprehension
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
resources
Articulation
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Working Memory
Sentence Comprehension
Hierarchical Structure
Syntax
Resources

Keywords

  • Broca's area
  • fMRI
  • sentence processing
  • speech comprehension
  • syntax

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Sentence processing selectivity in Broca's area : evident for structure but not syntactic movement. / Rogalsky, Corianne; Almeida, Diogo; Sprouse, Jon; Hickok, Gregory.

In: Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, Vol. 30, No. 10, 26.11.2015, p. 1326-1338.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rogalsky, Corianne ; Almeida, Diogo ; Sprouse, Jon ; Hickok, Gregory. / Sentence processing selectivity in Broca's area : evident for structure but not syntactic movement. In: Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. 2015 ; Vol. 30, No. 10. pp. 1326-1338.
@article{f30039ec1934467aaaefbe776b4e5293,
title = "Sentence processing selectivity in Broca's area: evident for structure but not syntactic movement",
abstract = "The role of Broca’s area in sentence processing is hotly debated. Hypotheses include that Broca’s area supports sentence comprehension via syntax-specific processes, hierarchical structure building, or working memory. Here we adopt a within-subject functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) approach using sentence-level contrasts and non-sentential comparison tasks to address these hypotheses. Standard syntactic movement distance effects were replicated, but no difference was found between movement and non-movement sentences in Broca's area in the group or consistently in the individual subject analyses. Group and individual results both identify Broca's area subregions that are selective for sentence structure. Group, but not individual subject results, suggest shared resources for sentence processing and articulation in Broca's area. We conclude that Broca’s area is not selectively processing syntactic movement, but that subregions are selectively responsive to sentence structure. Our findings reinforce Fedorenko and Kanwishser's call for individual subject analyses in Broca's area, as group findings can obscure selective responses.",
keywords = "Broca's area, fMRI, sentence processing, speech comprehension, syntax",
author = "Corianne Rogalsky and Diogo Almeida and Jon Sprouse and Gregory Hickok",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1080/23273798.2015.1066831",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "1326--1338",
journal = "Language, Cognition and Neuroscience",
issn = "2327-3798",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sentence processing selectivity in Broca's area

T2 - evident for structure but not syntactic movement

AU - Rogalsky, Corianne

AU - Almeida, Diogo

AU - Sprouse, Jon

AU - Hickok, Gregory

PY - 2015/11/26

Y1 - 2015/11/26

N2 - The role of Broca’s area in sentence processing is hotly debated. Hypotheses include that Broca’s area supports sentence comprehension via syntax-specific processes, hierarchical structure building, or working memory. Here we adopt a within-subject functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) approach using sentence-level contrasts and non-sentential comparison tasks to address these hypotheses. Standard syntactic movement distance effects were replicated, but no difference was found between movement and non-movement sentences in Broca's area in the group or consistently in the individual subject analyses. Group and individual results both identify Broca's area subregions that are selective for sentence structure. Group, but not individual subject results, suggest shared resources for sentence processing and articulation in Broca's area. We conclude that Broca’s area is not selectively processing syntactic movement, but that subregions are selectively responsive to sentence structure. Our findings reinforce Fedorenko and Kanwishser's call for individual subject analyses in Broca's area, as group findings can obscure selective responses.

AB - The role of Broca’s area in sentence processing is hotly debated. Hypotheses include that Broca’s area supports sentence comprehension via syntax-specific processes, hierarchical structure building, or working memory. Here we adopt a within-subject functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) approach using sentence-level contrasts and non-sentential comparison tasks to address these hypotheses. Standard syntactic movement distance effects were replicated, but no difference was found between movement and non-movement sentences in Broca's area in the group or consistently in the individual subject analyses. Group and individual results both identify Broca's area subregions that are selective for sentence structure. Group, but not individual subject results, suggest shared resources for sentence processing and articulation in Broca's area. We conclude that Broca’s area is not selectively processing syntactic movement, but that subregions are selectively responsive to sentence structure. Our findings reinforce Fedorenko and Kanwishser's call for individual subject analyses in Broca's area, as group findings can obscure selective responses.

KW - Broca's area

KW - fMRI

KW - sentence processing

KW - speech comprehension

KW - syntax

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947037816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947037816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/23273798.2015.1066831

DO - 10.1080/23273798.2015.1066831

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84947037816

VL - 30

SP - 1326

EP - 1338

JO - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

JF - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

SN - 2327-3798

IS - 10

ER -