Semantics and The Number of English Sentences

Thomas Bjurlö, Dale Jamieson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    How many English sentences are there? Infinitely many has long been the answer in the catechisms of the orthodox. And not without reason. ‘This is the cat that caught the rat.’ is an English sentence. So is ‘This is the cat that caught the rat that stole the cheese.’. ‘This is the cat with white paws that caught the rat that stole the cheese.’ is unobjectionable as well. Since a clear cutoff point cannot be specified, it is tempting to resort to the three dots. We argue that the argument from the lack of a clear cutoff point to infinity is a bad argument; the set of English sentences may be a fuzzy set rather than a standard set. We also argue that the initial question suppresses several quite distinct questions. A tjieory constructed to account for formal relations between sentences might warrant the positing of infinite semantic structures. A theory constructed to account for human understanding probably would not. Furthermore the common claim that infinity is necessary if there are to be novel and creative uses of language is found to be entirely without substance.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)385-393
    Number of pages9
    JournalStudies in Language
    Volume3
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1979

    Fingerprint

    Rats
    Cheeses
    Semantics
    semantics
    lack
    language
    Fuzzy sets
    Rat
    Infinity
    Warrants
    Language
    Catechism
    Semantic Structure
    Fuzzy Sets

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Language and Linguistics
    • Linguistics and Language
    • Communication

    Cite this

    Semantics and The Number of English Sentences. / Bjurlö, Thomas; Jamieson, Dale.

    In: Studies in Language, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1979, p. 385-393.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Bjurlö, Thomas ; Jamieson, Dale. / Semantics and The Number of English Sentences. In: Studies in Language. 1979 ; Vol. 3, No. 3. pp. 385-393.
    @article{e2418c40010c459e90215d4abd1bfc03,
    title = "Semantics and The Number of English Sentences",
    abstract = "How many English sentences are there? Infinitely many has long been the answer in the catechisms of the orthodox. And not without reason. ‘This is the cat that caught the rat.’ is an English sentence. So is ‘This is the cat that caught the rat that stole the cheese.’. ‘This is the cat with white paws that caught the rat that stole the cheese.’ is unobjectionable as well. Since a clear cutoff point cannot be specified, it is tempting to resort to the three dots. We argue that the argument from the lack of a clear cutoff point to infinity is a bad argument; the set of English sentences may be a fuzzy set rather than a standard set. We also argue that the initial question suppresses several quite distinct questions. A tjieory constructed to account for formal relations between sentences might warrant the positing of infinite semantic structures. A theory constructed to account for human understanding probably would not. Furthermore the common claim that infinity is necessary if there are to be novel and creative uses of language is found to be entirely without substance.",
    author = "Thomas Bjurl{\"o} and Dale Jamieson",
    year = "1979",
    doi = "10.1075/sl.3.3.04bju",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "3",
    pages = "385--393",
    journal = "Studies in Language",
    issn = "0378-4177",
    publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Semantics and The Number of English Sentences

    AU - Bjurlö, Thomas

    AU - Jamieson, Dale

    PY - 1979

    Y1 - 1979

    N2 - How many English sentences are there? Infinitely many has long been the answer in the catechisms of the orthodox. And not without reason. ‘This is the cat that caught the rat.’ is an English sentence. So is ‘This is the cat that caught the rat that stole the cheese.’. ‘This is the cat with white paws that caught the rat that stole the cheese.’ is unobjectionable as well. Since a clear cutoff point cannot be specified, it is tempting to resort to the three dots. We argue that the argument from the lack of a clear cutoff point to infinity is a bad argument; the set of English sentences may be a fuzzy set rather than a standard set. We also argue that the initial question suppresses several quite distinct questions. A tjieory constructed to account for formal relations between sentences might warrant the positing of infinite semantic structures. A theory constructed to account for human understanding probably would not. Furthermore the common claim that infinity is necessary if there are to be novel and creative uses of language is found to be entirely without substance.

    AB - How many English sentences are there? Infinitely many has long been the answer in the catechisms of the orthodox. And not without reason. ‘This is the cat that caught the rat.’ is an English sentence. So is ‘This is the cat that caught the rat that stole the cheese.’. ‘This is the cat with white paws that caught the rat that stole the cheese.’ is unobjectionable as well. Since a clear cutoff point cannot be specified, it is tempting to resort to the three dots. We argue that the argument from the lack of a clear cutoff point to infinity is a bad argument; the set of English sentences may be a fuzzy set rather than a standard set. We also argue that the initial question suppresses several quite distinct questions. A tjieory constructed to account for formal relations between sentences might warrant the positing of infinite semantic structures. A theory constructed to account for human understanding probably would not. Furthermore the common claim that infinity is necessary if there are to be novel and creative uses of language is found to be entirely without substance.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969482558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84969482558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1075/sl.3.3.04bju

    DO - 10.1075/sl.3.3.04bju

    M3 - Article

    VL - 3

    SP - 385

    EP - 393

    JO - Studies in Language

    JF - Studies in Language

    SN - 0378-4177

    IS - 3

    ER -