Self-Symbolizing and the Neglect of Others' Perspectives

Peter Gollwitzer, Robert A. Wicklund

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the present pair of studies interpersonal cues were set up, prompting self-descriptions that would be in potential conflict with subjects' self-definitional needs. It was hypothesized that self-definitional needs would hinder subjects' responding to the interpersonal aspects of the situation. In both studies subjects committed to a certain self-definition (e.g., female professional, journalist, mathematician) were given feedback that their personality did or did not predispose them to be successful in their self-definitional realms. Subsequently, in a different context, subjects had to compete in expressing positive self-descriptions that were related or unrelated to their self-definitions (Experiment 1). Subjects given negative personality feedback dominated the competition, provided that the self-descriptions were related to the self-definition to which they felt committed. In Experiment 2, male subjects were asked to report on their standing in their self-definitional realms to an attractive female target person, after she had indicated a preference for either self-deprecating or self-aggrandizing self-descriptions. Subjects given positive personality feedback were more self-deprecating than subjects who received negative personality feedback, given the presence of a cue to be self-deprecating. In addition, positive feedback subjects complied with the self-presentational cue set by the target person in proportion to their attraction to her, whereas negative feedback subjects failed to do so. The results are discussed in terms of a recent notion of symbolic self-completion (Wicklund & Gollwitzer, 1982) and in terms of other views on the self.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)702-715
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume48
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1985

Fingerprint

neglect
Personality
Cues
personality
Ego
conflict potential
human being
experiment
journalist
present

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Self-Symbolizing and the Neglect of Others' Perspectives. / Gollwitzer, Peter; Wicklund, Robert A.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 48, No. 3, 03.1985, p. 702-715.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b1525b471e934c869a043827efce99da,
title = "Self-Symbolizing and the Neglect of Others' Perspectives",
abstract = "In the present pair of studies interpersonal cues were set up, prompting self-descriptions that would be in potential conflict with subjects' self-definitional needs. It was hypothesized that self-definitional needs would hinder subjects' responding to the interpersonal aspects of the situation. In both studies subjects committed to a certain self-definition (e.g., female professional, journalist, mathematician) were given feedback that their personality did or did not predispose them to be successful in their self-definitional realms. Subsequently, in a different context, subjects had to compete in expressing positive self-descriptions that were related or unrelated to their self-definitions (Experiment 1). Subjects given negative personality feedback dominated the competition, provided that the self-descriptions were related to the self-definition to which they felt committed. In Experiment 2, male subjects were asked to report on their standing in their self-definitional realms to an attractive female target person, after she had indicated a preference for either self-deprecating or self-aggrandizing self-descriptions. Subjects given positive personality feedback were more self-deprecating than subjects who received negative personality feedback, given the presence of a cue to be self-deprecating. In addition, positive feedback subjects complied with the self-presentational cue set by the target person in proportion to their attraction to her, whereas negative feedback subjects failed to do so. The results are discussed in terms of a recent notion of symbolic self-completion (Wicklund & Gollwitzer, 1982) and in terms of other views on the self.",
author = "Peter Gollwitzer and Wicklund, {Robert A.}",
year = "1985",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1037/0022-3514.48.3.702",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "702--715",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-Symbolizing and the Neglect of Others' Perspectives

AU - Gollwitzer, Peter

AU - Wicklund, Robert A.

PY - 1985/3

Y1 - 1985/3

N2 - In the present pair of studies interpersonal cues were set up, prompting self-descriptions that would be in potential conflict with subjects' self-definitional needs. It was hypothesized that self-definitional needs would hinder subjects' responding to the interpersonal aspects of the situation. In both studies subjects committed to a certain self-definition (e.g., female professional, journalist, mathematician) were given feedback that their personality did or did not predispose them to be successful in their self-definitional realms. Subsequently, in a different context, subjects had to compete in expressing positive self-descriptions that were related or unrelated to their self-definitions (Experiment 1). Subjects given negative personality feedback dominated the competition, provided that the self-descriptions were related to the self-definition to which they felt committed. In Experiment 2, male subjects were asked to report on their standing in their self-definitional realms to an attractive female target person, after she had indicated a preference for either self-deprecating or self-aggrandizing self-descriptions. Subjects given positive personality feedback were more self-deprecating than subjects who received negative personality feedback, given the presence of a cue to be self-deprecating. In addition, positive feedback subjects complied with the self-presentational cue set by the target person in proportion to their attraction to her, whereas negative feedback subjects failed to do so. The results are discussed in terms of a recent notion of symbolic self-completion (Wicklund & Gollwitzer, 1982) and in terms of other views on the self.

AB - In the present pair of studies interpersonal cues were set up, prompting self-descriptions that would be in potential conflict with subjects' self-definitional needs. It was hypothesized that self-definitional needs would hinder subjects' responding to the interpersonal aspects of the situation. In both studies subjects committed to a certain self-definition (e.g., female professional, journalist, mathematician) were given feedback that their personality did or did not predispose them to be successful in their self-definitional realms. Subsequently, in a different context, subjects had to compete in expressing positive self-descriptions that were related or unrelated to their self-definitions (Experiment 1). Subjects given negative personality feedback dominated the competition, provided that the self-descriptions were related to the self-definition to which they felt committed. In Experiment 2, male subjects were asked to report on their standing in their self-definitional realms to an attractive female target person, after she had indicated a preference for either self-deprecating or self-aggrandizing self-descriptions. Subjects given positive personality feedback were more self-deprecating than subjects who received negative personality feedback, given the presence of a cue to be self-deprecating. In addition, positive feedback subjects complied with the self-presentational cue set by the target person in proportion to their attraction to her, whereas negative feedback subjects failed to do so. The results are discussed in terms of a recent notion of symbolic self-completion (Wicklund & Gollwitzer, 1982) and in terms of other views on the self.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000741528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000741528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-3514.48.3.702

DO - 10.1037/0022-3514.48.3.702

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 702

EP - 715

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 3

ER -