Self-regulation in ultimatum bargaining

Goals and plans help accepting unfair but profitable offers

Dan Kirk, Peter Gollwitzer, Peter J. Carnevale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Impulsive responses to ultimatums may cause rejection of unfair offers at a cost to oneself. A possible ameliorating strategy is self-regulation by setting goals and making plans geared toward controlling impulsive responses that may lead to rejection. Two studies test the hypothesis that entering an ultimatum with specific goals and plans (i.e., implementation intentions) will lead to increased acceptances of ultimatums that are unfair but more profitable than rejection. In Experiment 1 participants with a goal intention to stay calm accepted unfair ultimatums more than participants who were not given such a goal. In Experiment 2, we studied participants' reactions to ultimatums that were harder to accept, and found that goal intentions supported with implementation intentions (if-then plans) significantly increased the chance of acceptance, compared with having only goal intentions. Implications of these findings for self-regulation in ultimatum bargaining are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)528-546
Number of pages19
JournalSocial Cognition
Volume29
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2011

Fingerprint

Self-Control
Costs and Cost Analysis
Rejection (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Self-regulation in ultimatum bargaining : Goals and plans help accepting unfair but profitable offers. / Kirk, Dan; Gollwitzer, Peter; Carnevale, Peter J.

In: Social Cognition, Vol. 29, No. 5, 10.2011, p. 528-546.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{91613f6665a04e12980c0a74a93ca7b2,
title = "Self-regulation in ultimatum bargaining: Goals and plans help accepting unfair but profitable offers",
abstract = "Impulsive responses to ultimatums may cause rejection of unfair offers at a cost to oneself. A possible ameliorating strategy is self-regulation by setting goals and making plans geared toward controlling impulsive responses that may lead to rejection. Two studies test the hypothesis that entering an ultimatum with specific goals and plans (i.e., implementation intentions) will lead to increased acceptances of ultimatums that are unfair but more profitable than rejection. In Experiment 1 participants with a goal intention to stay calm accepted unfair ultimatums more than participants who were not given such a goal. In Experiment 2, we studied participants' reactions to ultimatums that were harder to accept, and found that goal intentions supported with implementation intentions (if-then plans) significantly increased the chance of acceptance, compared with having only goal intentions. Implications of these findings for self-regulation in ultimatum bargaining are discussed.",
author = "Dan Kirk and Peter Gollwitzer and Carnevale, {Peter J.}",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1521/soco.2011.29.5.528",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "528--546",
journal = "Social Cognition",
issn = "0278-016X",
publisher = "Guilford Publications",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-regulation in ultimatum bargaining

T2 - Goals and plans help accepting unfair but profitable offers

AU - Kirk, Dan

AU - Gollwitzer, Peter

AU - Carnevale, Peter J.

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - Impulsive responses to ultimatums may cause rejection of unfair offers at a cost to oneself. A possible ameliorating strategy is self-regulation by setting goals and making plans geared toward controlling impulsive responses that may lead to rejection. Two studies test the hypothesis that entering an ultimatum with specific goals and plans (i.e., implementation intentions) will lead to increased acceptances of ultimatums that are unfair but more profitable than rejection. In Experiment 1 participants with a goal intention to stay calm accepted unfair ultimatums more than participants who were not given such a goal. In Experiment 2, we studied participants' reactions to ultimatums that were harder to accept, and found that goal intentions supported with implementation intentions (if-then plans) significantly increased the chance of acceptance, compared with having only goal intentions. Implications of these findings for self-regulation in ultimatum bargaining are discussed.

AB - Impulsive responses to ultimatums may cause rejection of unfair offers at a cost to oneself. A possible ameliorating strategy is self-regulation by setting goals and making plans geared toward controlling impulsive responses that may lead to rejection. Two studies test the hypothesis that entering an ultimatum with specific goals and plans (i.e., implementation intentions) will lead to increased acceptances of ultimatums that are unfair but more profitable than rejection. In Experiment 1 participants with a goal intention to stay calm accepted unfair ultimatums more than participants who were not given such a goal. In Experiment 2, we studied participants' reactions to ultimatums that were harder to accept, and found that goal intentions supported with implementation intentions (if-then plans) significantly increased the chance of acceptance, compared with having only goal intentions. Implications of these findings for self-regulation in ultimatum bargaining are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052749348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052749348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1521/soco.2011.29.5.528

DO - 10.1521/soco.2011.29.5.528

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 528

EP - 546

JO - Social Cognition

JF - Social Cognition

SN - 0278-016X

IS - 5

ER -