Self-management of lymphedema

A systematic review of the literature from 2004 to 2011

Sheila H. Ridner, Mei R. Fu, Ausanee Wanchai, Bob R. Stewart, Jane M. Armer, Janice N. Cormier

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

BACKGROUND:: Little is known about the effectiveness of activities used to self-manage lymphedema. OBJECTIVE:: The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of evidence of peer-reviewed lymphedema self-care literature published from January 2004 to May 2011. METHODS:: Eleven major medical databases were searched. Articles were selected for inclusion or exclusion into the category of self-management of lymphedema by topic experts. The definition of self-management included activities that individuals initiate and perform for themselves without the assistance of others. Articles were scored according to the Oncology Nursing Society's Putting Evidence Into Practice levels of evidence. RESULTS:: Sixteen articles met criteria for inclusion in this review, with self-management as the independent variable. Ten categories of self-management were established subsequently and articles were classified by levels of evidence. In these categories, no self-management studies were rated as "recommended for practice," 2 studies were rated "likely to be effective," none was rated "benefits balanced with harms," 7were rated "effectiveness not established," and 1 was rated "effectiveness unlikely." DISCUSSION:: Few studies included measures of outcomes associated with lymphedema, and there was a scarcity of randomized controlled trials in lymphedema self-management. A demonstrated need exists for the design and testing of self-management interventions that include appropriate outcome measures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)291-299
Number of pages9
JournalNursing Research
Volume61
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Lymphedema
Self Care
Nursing Societies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Oncology Nursing
Randomized Controlled Trials
Databases

Keywords

  • literature review
  • lymphedema
  • self-management
  • systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Self-management of lymphedema : A systematic review of the literature from 2004 to 2011. / Ridner, Sheila H.; Fu, Mei R.; Wanchai, Ausanee; Stewart, Bob R.; Armer, Jane M.; Cormier, Janice N.

In: Nursing Research, Vol. 61, No. 4, 2012, p. 291-299.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Ridner, Sheila H. ; Fu, Mei R. ; Wanchai, Ausanee ; Stewart, Bob R. ; Armer, Jane M. ; Cormier, Janice N. / Self-management of lymphedema : A systematic review of the literature from 2004 to 2011. In: Nursing Research. 2012 ; Vol. 61, No. 4. pp. 291-299.
@article{ab8abc69a1b84db9bc7f848a8a34456a,
title = "Self-management of lymphedema: A systematic review of the literature from 2004 to 2011",
abstract = "BACKGROUND:: Little is known about the effectiveness of activities used to self-manage lymphedema. OBJECTIVE:: The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of evidence of peer-reviewed lymphedema self-care literature published from January 2004 to May 2011. METHODS:: Eleven major medical databases were searched. Articles were selected for inclusion or exclusion into the category of self-management of lymphedema by topic experts. The definition of self-management included activities that individuals initiate and perform for themselves without the assistance of others. Articles were scored according to the Oncology Nursing Society's Putting Evidence Into Practice levels of evidence. RESULTS:: Sixteen articles met criteria for inclusion in this review, with self-management as the independent variable. Ten categories of self-management were established subsequently and articles were classified by levels of evidence. In these categories, no self-management studies were rated as {"}recommended for practice,{"} 2 studies were rated {"}likely to be effective,{"} none was rated {"}benefits balanced with harms,{"} 7were rated {"}effectiveness not established,{"} and 1 was rated {"}effectiveness unlikely.{"} DISCUSSION:: Few studies included measures of outcomes associated with lymphedema, and there was a scarcity of randomized controlled trials in lymphedema self-management. A demonstrated need exists for the design and testing of self-management interventions that include appropriate outcome measures.",
keywords = "literature review, lymphedema, self-management, systematic review",
author = "Ridner, {Sheila H.} and Fu, {Mei R.} and Ausanee Wanchai and Stewart, {Bob R.} and Armer, {Jane M.} and Cormier, {Janice N.}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1097/NNR.0b013e31824f82b2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "291--299",
journal = "Nursing Research",
issn = "0029-6562",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-management of lymphedema

T2 - A systematic review of the literature from 2004 to 2011

AU - Ridner, Sheila H.

AU - Fu, Mei R.

AU - Wanchai, Ausanee

AU - Stewart, Bob R.

AU - Armer, Jane M.

AU - Cormier, Janice N.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - BACKGROUND:: Little is known about the effectiveness of activities used to self-manage lymphedema. OBJECTIVE:: The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of evidence of peer-reviewed lymphedema self-care literature published from January 2004 to May 2011. METHODS:: Eleven major medical databases were searched. Articles were selected for inclusion or exclusion into the category of self-management of lymphedema by topic experts. The definition of self-management included activities that individuals initiate and perform for themselves without the assistance of others. Articles were scored according to the Oncology Nursing Society's Putting Evidence Into Practice levels of evidence. RESULTS:: Sixteen articles met criteria for inclusion in this review, with self-management as the independent variable. Ten categories of self-management were established subsequently and articles were classified by levels of evidence. In these categories, no self-management studies were rated as "recommended for practice," 2 studies were rated "likely to be effective," none was rated "benefits balanced with harms," 7were rated "effectiveness not established," and 1 was rated "effectiveness unlikely." DISCUSSION:: Few studies included measures of outcomes associated with lymphedema, and there was a scarcity of randomized controlled trials in lymphedema self-management. A demonstrated need exists for the design and testing of self-management interventions that include appropriate outcome measures.

AB - BACKGROUND:: Little is known about the effectiveness of activities used to self-manage lymphedema. OBJECTIVE:: The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of evidence of peer-reviewed lymphedema self-care literature published from January 2004 to May 2011. METHODS:: Eleven major medical databases were searched. Articles were selected for inclusion or exclusion into the category of self-management of lymphedema by topic experts. The definition of self-management included activities that individuals initiate and perform for themselves without the assistance of others. Articles were scored according to the Oncology Nursing Society's Putting Evidence Into Practice levels of evidence. RESULTS:: Sixteen articles met criteria for inclusion in this review, with self-management as the independent variable. Ten categories of self-management were established subsequently and articles were classified by levels of evidence. In these categories, no self-management studies were rated as "recommended for practice," 2 studies were rated "likely to be effective," none was rated "benefits balanced with harms," 7were rated "effectiveness not established," and 1 was rated "effectiveness unlikely." DISCUSSION:: Few studies included measures of outcomes associated with lymphedema, and there was a scarcity of randomized controlled trials in lymphedema self-management. A demonstrated need exists for the design and testing of self-management interventions that include appropriate outcome measures.

KW - literature review

KW - lymphedema

KW - self-management

KW - systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027942373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027942373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31824f82b2

DO - 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31824f82b2

M3 - Review article

VL - 61

SP - 291

EP - 299

JO - Nursing Research

JF - Nursing Research

SN - 0029-6562

IS - 4

ER -