Seeing "us vs. them"

Minimal group effects on the neural encoding of faces

Kyle G. Ratner, David Amodio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Faces are inherently social, but the extent to which social group information affects early face processing remains unknown. To address this issue, we examined cortical activity associated with structural encoding of novel ingroup vs. outgroup faces. Participants were assigned to one of two arbitrarily-defined groups using the minimal group procedure, and event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while participants categorized faces of people identified as members of their novel ingroup vs. outgroup. Our analysis focused on the N170 component of the ERP, which peaks 170. ms following face onset and reflects face structural encoding. Ingroup faces elicited larger N170 amplitudes than outgroup faces, suggesting that mere group information affects this initial stage of face perception. These findings show that social categories influence how we "see" faces, thus providing insight into the process through which categorizations may lead to biased intergroup perceptions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)298-301
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume49
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2013

Fingerprint

outgroup
Group
event
Evoked Potentials

Keywords

  • ERP
  • Face processing
  • Group categorization
  • Minimal group
  • N170

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Seeing "us vs. them" : Minimal group effects on the neural encoding of faces. / Ratner, Kyle G.; Amodio, David.

In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 49, No. 2, 03.2013, p. 298-301.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{51188018d7c74ca9b573a60b4aea9c58,
title = "Seeing {"}us vs. them{"}: Minimal group effects on the neural encoding of faces",
abstract = "Faces are inherently social, but the extent to which social group information affects early face processing remains unknown. To address this issue, we examined cortical activity associated with structural encoding of novel ingroup vs. outgroup faces. Participants were assigned to one of two arbitrarily-defined groups using the minimal group procedure, and event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while participants categorized faces of people identified as members of their novel ingroup vs. outgroup. Our analysis focused on the N170 component of the ERP, which peaks 170. ms following face onset and reflects face structural encoding. Ingroup faces elicited larger N170 amplitudes than outgroup faces, suggesting that mere group information affects this initial stage of face perception. These findings show that social categories influence how we {"}see{"} faces, thus providing insight into the process through which categorizations may lead to biased intergroup perceptions.",
keywords = "ERP, Face processing, Group categorization, Minimal group, N170",
author = "Ratner, {Kyle G.} and David Amodio",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "298--301",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-1031",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Seeing "us vs. them"

T2 - Minimal group effects on the neural encoding of faces

AU - Ratner, Kyle G.

AU - Amodio, David

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - Faces are inherently social, but the extent to which social group information affects early face processing remains unknown. To address this issue, we examined cortical activity associated with structural encoding of novel ingroup vs. outgroup faces. Participants were assigned to one of two arbitrarily-defined groups using the minimal group procedure, and event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while participants categorized faces of people identified as members of their novel ingroup vs. outgroup. Our analysis focused on the N170 component of the ERP, which peaks 170. ms following face onset and reflects face structural encoding. Ingroup faces elicited larger N170 amplitudes than outgroup faces, suggesting that mere group information affects this initial stage of face perception. These findings show that social categories influence how we "see" faces, thus providing insight into the process through which categorizations may lead to biased intergroup perceptions.

AB - Faces are inherently social, but the extent to which social group information affects early face processing remains unknown. To address this issue, we examined cortical activity associated with structural encoding of novel ingroup vs. outgroup faces. Participants were assigned to one of two arbitrarily-defined groups using the minimal group procedure, and event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while participants categorized faces of people identified as members of their novel ingroup vs. outgroup. Our analysis focused on the N170 component of the ERP, which peaks 170. ms following face onset and reflects face structural encoding. Ingroup faces elicited larger N170 amplitudes than outgroup faces, suggesting that mere group information affects this initial stage of face perception. These findings show that social categories influence how we "see" faces, thus providing insight into the process through which categorizations may lead to biased intergroup perceptions.

KW - ERP

KW - Face processing

KW - Group categorization

KW - Minimal group

KW - N170

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871733422&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871733422&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.017

DO - 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.017

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 298

EP - 301

JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

SN - 0022-1031

IS - 2

ER -