Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: Probability and the mental representation of events

Cheryl J. Wakslak, Yaacov Trope, Nira Liberman, Rotem Alony

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Conceptualizing probability as psychological distance, the authors draw on construal level theory (Y. Trope & N. Liberman, 2003) to propose that decreasing an event's probability leads individuals to represent the event by its central, abstract, general features (high-level construal) rather than by its peripheral, concrete, specific features (low-level construal). Results indicated that when reported probabilities of events were low rather than high, participants were more broad (Study 1) and inclusive (Study 2) in their categorization of objects, increased their preference for general rather than specific activity descriptions (Study 3), segmented ongoing behavior into fewer units (Study 4), were more successful at abstracting visual information (Study 5), and were less successful at identifying details missing within a coherent visual whole (Study 6). Further, after exposure to low-probability as opposed to high-probability phrases, participants increasingly preferred to identify actions in ends-related rather than means-related terms (Study 7). Implications for probability assessment and choice under uncertainty are discussed. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)641-653
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Volume135
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2006

Fingerprint

Uncertainty
Forests
Psychology

Keywords

  • Abstract
  • Construal level theory
  • Events
  • Likelihood
  • Probability
  • Psychological distance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely : Probability and the mental representation of events. / Wakslak, Cheryl J.; Trope, Yaacov; Liberman, Nira; Alony, Rotem.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 135, No. 4, 11.2006, p. 641-653.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{09aaa202215b4a21b84a218b77855a4b,
title = "Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: Probability and the mental representation of events",
abstract = "Conceptualizing probability as psychological distance, the authors draw on construal level theory (Y. Trope & N. Liberman, 2003) to propose that decreasing an event's probability leads individuals to represent the event by its central, abstract, general features (high-level construal) rather than by its peripheral, concrete, specific features (low-level construal). Results indicated that when reported probabilities of events were low rather than high, participants were more broad (Study 1) and inclusive (Study 2) in their categorization of objects, increased their preference for general rather than specific activity descriptions (Study 3), segmented ongoing behavior into fewer units (Study 4), were more successful at abstracting visual information (Study 5), and were less successful at identifying details missing within a coherent visual whole (Study 6). Further, after exposure to low-probability as opposed to high-probability phrases, participants increasingly preferred to identify actions in ends-related rather than means-related terms (Study 7). Implications for probability assessment and choice under uncertainty are discussed. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved.",
keywords = "Abstract, Construal level theory, Events, Likelihood, Probability, Psychological distance",
author = "Wakslak, {Cheryl J.} and Yaacov Trope and Nira Liberman and Rotem Alony",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.641",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "135",
pages = "641--653",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: General",
issn = "0096-3445",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely

T2 - Probability and the mental representation of events

AU - Wakslak, Cheryl J.

AU - Trope, Yaacov

AU - Liberman, Nira

AU - Alony, Rotem

PY - 2006/11

Y1 - 2006/11

N2 - Conceptualizing probability as psychological distance, the authors draw on construal level theory (Y. Trope & N. Liberman, 2003) to propose that decreasing an event's probability leads individuals to represent the event by its central, abstract, general features (high-level construal) rather than by its peripheral, concrete, specific features (low-level construal). Results indicated that when reported probabilities of events were low rather than high, participants were more broad (Study 1) and inclusive (Study 2) in their categorization of objects, increased their preference for general rather than specific activity descriptions (Study 3), segmented ongoing behavior into fewer units (Study 4), were more successful at abstracting visual information (Study 5), and were less successful at identifying details missing within a coherent visual whole (Study 6). Further, after exposure to low-probability as opposed to high-probability phrases, participants increasingly preferred to identify actions in ends-related rather than means-related terms (Study 7). Implications for probability assessment and choice under uncertainty are discussed. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved.

AB - Conceptualizing probability as psychological distance, the authors draw on construal level theory (Y. Trope & N. Liberman, 2003) to propose that decreasing an event's probability leads individuals to represent the event by its central, abstract, general features (high-level construal) rather than by its peripheral, concrete, specific features (low-level construal). Results indicated that when reported probabilities of events were low rather than high, participants were more broad (Study 1) and inclusive (Study 2) in their categorization of objects, increased their preference for general rather than specific activity descriptions (Study 3), segmented ongoing behavior into fewer units (Study 4), were more successful at abstracting visual information (Study 5), and were less successful at identifying details missing within a coherent visual whole (Study 6). Further, after exposure to low-probability as opposed to high-probability phrases, participants increasingly preferred to identify actions in ends-related rather than means-related terms (Study 7). Implications for probability assessment and choice under uncertainty are discussed. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved.

KW - Abstract

KW - Construal level theory

KW - Events

KW - Likelihood

KW - Probability

KW - Psychological distance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750716075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750716075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.641

DO - 10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.641

M3 - Article

C2 - 17087578

AN - SCOPUS:33750716075

VL - 135

SP - 641

EP - 653

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

SN - 0096-3445

IS - 4

ER -