Secondhand hookah smoke: An occupational hazard for hookah bar employees

Sherry Zhou, Leili Behrooz, Michael Weitzman, Grace Pan, Ruzmyn Vilcassim, Jaime E. Mirowsky, Patrick Breysee, Ana Rule, Terry Gordon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background Despite the increasing popularity of hookah bars, there is a lack of research assessing the health effects of hookah smoke among employees. This study investigated indoor air quality in hookah bars and the health effects of secondhand hookah smoke on hookah bar workers. Methods Air samples were collected during the work shift of 10 workers in hookah bars in New York City (NYC). Air measurements of fine particulate matter (PM2.5), fine black carbon (BC2.5), carbon monoxide (CO), and nicotine were collected during each work shift. Blood pressure and heart rate, markers of active smoking and secondhand smoke exposure (exhaled CO and saliva cotinine levels), and selected inflammatory cytokines in blood (ineterleukin (IL)-1b, IL-6, IL-8, interferon γ (IFN-γ), tumour necrosis factor (TNF-α) were assessed in workers immediately prior to and immediately after their work shift. Results The PM2.5 (gravimetric) and BC2.5 concentrations in indoor air varied greatly among the work shifts with mean levels of 363.8 µg/m3 and 2.2 µg/m3, respectively. The mean CO level was 12.9 ppm with a peak value of 22.5 ppm CO observed in one hookah bar. While heart rate was elevated by 6 bpm after occupational exposure, this change was not statistically significant. Levels of inflammatory cytokines in blood were all increased at postshift compared to preshift testing with IFN-Y increasing from 0.85 (0.13) to 1.6 (0.25) (mean (standard error of the mean; SEM)) pg/mL ( p<0.01). Exhaled CO levels were significantly elevated after the work shift with 2 of 10 workers having values >90 ppm exhaled CO. Conclusions These results demonstrate that hookah bars have elevated concentrations of indoor air pollutants that appear to cause adverse health effects in employees. These data indicate the need for further research and a marked need for better air quality monitoring and policies in such establishments to improve the indoor air quality for workers and patrons.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)40-45
Number of pages6
JournalTobacco Control
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Tobacco Smoke Pollution
Carbon Monoxide
air
shift work
employee
Air
Indoor Air Pollution
worker
Health
Heart Rate
Cytokines
Soot
Cotinine
Air Pollutants
Particulate Matter
health
Occupational Exposure
Nicotine
Saliva
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Zhou, S., Behrooz, L., Weitzman, M., Pan, G., Vilcassim, R., Mirowsky, J. E., ... Gordon, T. (2017). Secondhand hookah smoke: An occupational hazard for hookah bar employees. Tobacco Control, 26(1), 40-45. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052505

Secondhand hookah smoke : An occupational hazard for hookah bar employees. / Zhou, Sherry; Behrooz, Leili; Weitzman, Michael; Pan, Grace; Vilcassim, Ruzmyn; Mirowsky, Jaime E.; Breysee, Patrick; Rule, Ana; Gordon, Terry.

In: Tobacco Control, Vol. 26, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 40-45.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zhou, S, Behrooz, L, Weitzman, M, Pan, G, Vilcassim, R, Mirowsky, JE, Breysee, P, Rule, A & Gordon, T 2017, 'Secondhand hookah smoke: An occupational hazard for hookah bar employees', Tobacco Control, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 40-45. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052505
Zhou, Sherry ; Behrooz, Leili ; Weitzman, Michael ; Pan, Grace ; Vilcassim, Ruzmyn ; Mirowsky, Jaime E. ; Breysee, Patrick ; Rule, Ana ; Gordon, Terry. / Secondhand hookah smoke : An occupational hazard for hookah bar employees. In: Tobacco Control. 2017 ; Vol. 26, No. 1. pp. 40-45.
@article{c098e7b5280d4004814eee7c7974094f,
title = "Secondhand hookah smoke: An occupational hazard for hookah bar employees",
abstract = "Background Despite the increasing popularity of hookah bars, there is a lack of research assessing the health effects of hookah smoke among employees. This study investigated indoor air quality in hookah bars and the health effects of secondhand hookah smoke on hookah bar workers. Methods Air samples were collected during the work shift of 10 workers in hookah bars in New York City (NYC). Air measurements of fine particulate matter (PM2.5), fine black carbon (BC2.5), carbon monoxide (CO), and nicotine were collected during each work shift. Blood pressure and heart rate, markers of active smoking and secondhand smoke exposure (exhaled CO and saliva cotinine levels), and selected inflammatory cytokines in blood (ineterleukin (IL)-1b, IL-6, IL-8, interferon γ (IFN-γ), tumour necrosis factor (TNF-α) were assessed in workers immediately prior to and immediately after their work shift. Results The PM2.5 (gravimetric) and BC2.5 concentrations in indoor air varied greatly among the work shifts with mean levels of 363.8 µg/m3 and 2.2 µg/m3, respectively. The mean CO level was 12.9 ppm with a peak value of 22.5 ppm CO observed in one hookah bar. While heart rate was elevated by 6 bpm after occupational exposure, this change was not statistically significant. Levels of inflammatory cytokines in blood were all increased at postshift compared to preshift testing with IFN-Y increasing from 0.85 (0.13) to 1.6 (0.25) (mean (standard error of the mean; SEM)) pg/mL ( p<0.01). Exhaled CO levels were significantly elevated after the work shift with 2 of 10 workers having values >90 ppm exhaled CO. Conclusions These results demonstrate that hookah bars have elevated concentrations of indoor air pollutants that appear to cause adverse health effects in employees. These data indicate the need for further research and a marked need for better air quality monitoring and policies in such establishments to improve the indoor air quality for workers and patrons.",
author = "Sherry Zhou and Leili Behrooz and Michael Weitzman and Grace Pan and Ruzmyn Vilcassim and Mirowsky, {Jaime E.} and Patrick Breysee and Ana Rule and Terry Gordon",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052505",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "40--45",
journal = "Tobacco Control",
issn = "0964-4563",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Secondhand hookah smoke

T2 - An occupational hazard for hookah bar employees

AU - Zhou, Sherry

AU - Behrooz, Leili

AU - Weitzman, Michael

AU - Pan, Grace

AU - Vilcassim, Ruzmyn

AU - Mirowsky, Jaime E.

AU - Breysee, Patrick

AU - Rule, Ana

AU - Gordon, Terry

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Background Despite the increasing popularity of hookah bars, there is a lack of research assessing the health effects of hookah smoke among employees. This study investigated indoor air quality in hookah bars and the health effects of secondhand hookah smoke on hookah bar workers. Methods Air samples were collected during the work shift of 10 workers in hookah bars in New York City (NYC). Air measurements of fine particulate matter (PM2.5), fine black carbon (BC2.5), carbon monoxide (CO), and nicotine were collected during each work shift. Blood pressure and heart rate, markers of active smoking and secondhand smoke exposure (exhaled CO and saliva cotinine levels), and selected inflammatory cytokines in blood (ineterleukin (IL)-1b, IL-6, IL-8, interferon γ (IFN-γ), tumour necrosis factor (TNF-α) were assessed in workers immediately prior to and immediately after their work shift. Results The PM2.5 (gravimetric) and BC2.5 concentrations in indoor air varied greatly among the work shifts with mean levels of 363.8 µg/m3 and 2.2 µg/m3, respectively. The mean CO level was 12.9 ppm with a peak value of 22.5 ppm CO observed in one hookah bar. While heart rate was elevated by 6 bpm after occupational exposure, this change was not statistically significant. Levels of inflammatory cytokines in blood were all increased at postshift compared to preshift testing with IFN-Y increasing from 0.85 (0.13) to 1.6 (0.25) (mean (standard error of the mean; SEM)) pg/mL ( p<0.01). Exhaled CO levels were significantly elevated after the work shift with 2 of 10 workers having values >90 ppm exhaled CO. Conclusions These results demonstrate that hookah bars have elevated concentrations of indoor air pollutants that appear to cause adverse health effects in employees. These data indicate the need for further research and a marked need for better air quality monitoring and policies in such establishments to improve the indoor air quality for workers and patrons.

AB - Background Despite the increasing popularity of hookah bars, there is a lack of research assessing the health effects of hookah smoke among employees. This study investigated indoor air quality in hookah bars and the health effects of secondhand hookah smoke on hookah bar workers. Methods Air samples were collected during the work shift of 10 workers in hookah bars in New York City (NYC). Air measurements of fine particulate matter (PM2.5), fine black carbon (BC2.5), carbon monoxide (CO), and nicotine were collected during each work shift. Blood pressure and heart rate, markers of active smoking and secondhand smoke exposure (exhaled CO and saliva cotinine levels), and selected inflammatory cytokines in blood (ineterleukin (IL)-1b, IL-6, IL-8, interferon γ (IFN-γ), tumour necrosis factor (TNF-α) were assessed in workers immediately prior to and immediately after their work shift. Results The PM2.5 (gravimetric) and BC2.5 concentrations in indoor air varied greatly among the work shifts with mean levels of 363.8 µg/m3 and 2.2 µg/m3, respectively. The mean CO level was 12.9 ppm with a peak value of 22.5 ppm CO observed in one hookah bar. While heart rate was elevated by 6 bpm after occupational exposure, this change was not statistically significant. Levels of inflammatory cytokines in blood were all increased at postshift compared to preshift testing with IFN-Y increasing from 0.85 (0.13) to 1.6 (0.25) (mean (standard error of the mean; SEM)) pg/mL ( p<0.01). Exhaled CO levels were significantly elevated after the work shift with 2 of 10 workers having values >90 ppm exhaled CO. Conclusions These results demonstrate that hookah bars have elevated concentrations of indoor air pollutants that appear to cause adverse health effects in employees. These data indicate the need for further research and a marked need for better air quality monitoring and policies in such establishments to improve the indoor air quality for workers and patrons.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962172850&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962172850&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052505

DO - 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052505

M3 - Article

C2 - 26811352

AN - SCOPUS:84962172850

VL - 26

SP - 40

EP - 45

JO - Tobacco Control

JF - Tobacco Control

SN - 0964-4563

IS - 1

ER -