Secondary products and the measurement of productivity growth

Thijs ten Raa, Edward Wolff

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The paper considers alternative treatments of secondary products in input-output systems and analyzes their implications for the measurement of productivity growth at both the sectoral and overall level. Two standard models of secondary products are used: (1) the commodity technology model and (2) the industry technology model. It is argued that the first model correctly relates sectoral and overall levels of productivity growth; the second model, though more conventional, aggregates sectoral levels to a biased estimate of overall productivity growth. Estimates of the two measures are provided using U.S. 85-sector input-output data for 1967, 1972, and 1977. The empirical results indicate that the alternative assumptions do not lead to significantly different estimates of commodity-level and industry-level productivity growth over this period for the full economy but do for several sectors. Moreover, changes in secondary production did not contribute significantly to the decline in productivity growth over this period but secondary production was found to have a much lower rate of productivity growth than primary production.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)581-615
    Number of pages35
    JournalRegional Science and Urban Economics
    Volume21
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1991

    Fingerprint

    productivity
    secondary production
    commodity
    industry
    product
    Productivity growth
    primary production
    economy
    Commodities
    Industry

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics and Econometrics
    • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
    • Environmental Science(all)

    Cite this

    Secondary products and the measurement of productivity growth. / Raa, Thijs ten; Wolff, Edward.

    In: Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 21, No. 4, 1991, p. 581-615.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Raa, Thijs ten ; Wolff, Edward. / Secondary products and the measurement of productivity growth. In: Regional Science and Urban Economics. 1991 ; Vol. 21, No. 4. pp. 581-615.
    @article{bed3ce98ccb24d928b79347e5c638982,
    title = "Secondary products and the measurement of productivity growth",
    abstract = "The paper considers alternative treatments of secondary products in input-output systems and analyzes their implications for the measurement of productivity growth at both the sectoral and overall level. Two standard models of secondary products are used: (1) the commodity technology model and (2) the industry technology model. It is argued that the first model correctly relates sectoral and overall levels of productivity growth; the second model, though more conventional, aggregates sectoral levels to a biased estimate of overall productivity growth. Estimates of the two measures are provided using U.S. 85-sector input-output data for 1967, 1972, and 1977. The empirical results indicate that the alternative assumptions do not lead to significantly different estimates of commodity-level and industry-level productivity growth over this period for the full economy but do for several sectors. Moreover, changes in secondary production did not contribute significantly to the decline in productivity growth over this period but secondary production was found to have a much lower rate of productivity growth than primary production.",
    author = "Raa, {Thijs ten} and Edward Wolff",
    year = "1991",
    doi = "10.1016/0166-0462(91)90022-F",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "21",
    pages = "581--615",
    journal = "Regional Science and Urban Economics",
    issn = "0166-0462",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Secondary products and the measurement of productivity growth

    AU - Raa, Thijs ten

    AU - Wolff, Edward

    PY - 1991

    Y1 - 1991

    N2 - The paper considers alternative treatments of secondary products in input-output systems and analyzes their implications for the measurement of productivity growth at both the sectoral and overall level. Two standard models of secondary products are used: (1) the commodity technology model and (2) the industry technology model. It is argued that the first model correctly relates sectoral and overall levels of productivity growth; the second model, though more conventional, aggregates sectoral levels to a biased estimate of overall productivity growth. Estimates of the two measures are provided using U.S. 85-sector input-output data for 1967, 1972, and 1977. The empirical results indicate that the alternative assumptions do not lead to significantly different estimates of commodity-level and industry-level productivity growth over this period for the full economy but do for several sectors. Moreover, changes in secondary production did not contribute significantly to the decline in productivity growth over this period but secondary production was found to have a much lower rate of productivity growth than primary production.

    AB - The paper considers alternative treatments of secondary products in input-output systems and analyzes their implications for the measurement of productivity growth at both the sectoral and overall level. Two standard models of secondary products are used: (1) the commodity technology model and (2) the industry technology model. It is argued that the first model correctly relates sectoral and overall levels of productivity growth; the second model, though more conventional, aggregates sectoral levels to a biased estimate of overall productivity growth. Estimates of the two measures are provided using U.S. 85-sector input-output data for 1967, 1972, and 1977. The empirical results indicate that the alternative assumptions do not lead to significantly different estimates of commodity-level and industry-level productivity growth over this period for the full economy but do for several sectors. Moreover, changes in secondary production did not contribute significantly to the decline in productivity growth over this period but secondary production was found to have a much lower rate of productivity growth than primary production.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026306668&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026306668&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/0166-0462(91)90022-F

    DO - 10.1016/0166-0462(91)90022-F

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:0026306668

    VL - 21

    SP - 581

    EP - 615

    JO - Regional Science and Urban Economics

    JF - Regional Science and Urban Economics

    SN - 0166-0462

    IS - 4

    ER -