Scientific uncertainty

How do we know when to communicate research findings to the public?

Dale Jamieson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The problem of when to communicate research findings with the public arises with respect to a broad range of environmental and health hazards. What many people would like is a rule of the form, 'Communicate research findings if and only if condition C obtains.', where condition C reflects some function that includes the probability of a harm occurring, the seriousness of the harm, the reliability of the data on which these estimates are based, and the potential usefulness of these projections for mitigating or preventing the harm in question. I argue that no such rule is forthcoming. I go on to distinguish uncertainty from ignorance and indeterminism. Uncertainty is not an objective quantity but is socially constructed by context, rhetorical role, the assumption of purposes, and the acceptance of knowledge claims. In a particular case, the first step in deciding whether to communicate research findings to the public is appreciating how the uncertainties have been constructed. Only then can we go on to ask the ethical questions about communicating research in an illuminating way.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)103-107
    Number of pages5
    JournalScience of the Total Environment
    Volume184
    Issue number1-2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - May 17 1996

    Fingerprint

    Health hazards
    environmental hazard
    public
    Uncertainty
    health hazard

    Keywords

    • Environmental epidemiology
    • Ethics guidelines
    • Health hazards
    • Public, communicating research findings to
    • Scientific uncertainty

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Environmental Engineering
    • Environmental Chemistry
    • Waste Management and Disposal
    • Pollution

    Cite this

    Scientific uncertainty : How do we know when to communicate research findings to the public? / Jamieson, Dale.

    In: Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 184, No. 1-2, 17.05.1996, p. 103-107.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{9e5b7ae72d4045baba750bfd8ae07ecf,
    title = "Scientific uncertainty: How do we know when to communicate research findings to the public?",
    abstract = "The problem of when to communicate research findings with the public arises with respect to a broad range of environmental and health hazards. What many people would like is a rule of the form, 'Communicate research findings if and only if condition C obtains.', where condition C reflects some function that includes the probability of a harm occurring, the seriousness of the harm, the reliability of the data on which these estimates are based, and the potential usefulness of these projections for mitigating or preventing the harm in question. I argue that no such rule is forthcoming. I go on to distinguish uncertainty from ignorance and indeterminism. Uncertainty is not an objective quantity but is socially constructed by context, rhetorical role, the assumption of purposes, and the acceptance of knowledge claims. In a particular case, the first step in deciding whether to communicate research findings to the public is appreciating how the uncertainties have been constructed. Only then can we go on to ask the ethical questions about communicating research in an illuminating way.",
    keywords = "Environmental epidemiology, Ethics guidelines, Health hazards, Public, communicating research findings to, Scientific uncertainty",
    author = "Dale Jamieson",
    year = "1996",
    month = "5",
    day = "17",
    doi = "10.1016/0048-9697(95)04995-9",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "184",
    pages = "103--107",
    journal = "Science of the Total Environment",
    issn = "0048-9697",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "1-2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Scientific uncertainty

    T2 - How do we know when to communicate research findings to the public?

    AU - Jamieson, Dale

    PY - 1996/5/17

    Y1 - 1996/5/17

    N2 - The problem of when to communicate research findings with the public arises with respect to a broad range of environmental and health hazards. What many people would like is a rule of the form, 'Communicate research findings if and only if condition C obtains.', where condition C reflects some function that includes the probability of a harm occurring, the seriousness of the harm, the reliability of the data on which these estimates are based, and the potential usefulness of these projections for mitigating or preventing the harm in question. I argue that no such rule is forthcoming. I go on to distinguish uncertainty from ignorance and indeterminism. Uncertainty is not an objective quantity but is socially constructed by context, rhetorical role, the assumption of purposes, and the acceptance of knowledge claims. In a particular case, the first step in deciding whether to communicate research findings to the public is appreciating how the uncertainties have been constructed. Only then can we go on to ask the ethical questions about communicating research in an illuminating way.

    AB - The problem of when to communicate research findings with the public arises with respect to a broad range of environmental and health hazards. What many people would like is a rule of the form, 'Communicate research findings if and only if condition C obtains.', where condition C reflects some function that includes the probability of a harm occurring, the seriousness of the harm, the reliability of the data on which these estimates are based, and the potential usefulness of these projections for mitigating or preventing the harm in question. I argue that no such rule is forthcoming. I go on to distinguish uncertainty from ignorance and indeterminism. Uncertainty is not an objective quantity but is socially constructed by context, rhetorical role, the assumption of purposes, and the acceptance of knowledge claims. In a particular case, the first step in deciding whether to communicate research findings to the public is appreciating how the uncertainties have been constructed. Only then can we go on to ask the ethical questions about communicating research in an illuminating way.

    KW - Environmental epidemiology

    KW - Ethics guidelines

    KW - Health hazards

    KW - Public, communicating research findings to

    KW - Scientific uncertainty

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029950179&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029950179&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/0048-9697(95)04995-9

    DO - 10.1016/0048-9697(95)04995-9

    M3 - Article

    VL - 184

    SP - 103

    EP - 107

    JO - Science of the Total Environment

    JF - Science of the Total Environment

    SN - 0048-9697

    IS - 1-2

    ER -