Schwa elision in fast speech

Segmental deletion or gestural overlap?

Lisa Davidson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Pretonic schwa elision in fast speech (e.g. potato -→ [pt]ato, demolish → [dm]olish) has been studied by both phonologists and phoneticians to understand how extralinguistic factors affect surface forms. Yet, both types of studies have major shortcomings. Phonological analyses attributing schwa elision to acrossthe- board segmental deletion have been based on researchers' intuitions. Phonetic accounts proposing that elision is best characterized as gestural overlap have been restricted to very few sequence types. In this study, 28 different [#C?C-] sequences are examined to define appropriate acoustic criteria for 'elision', to establish whether elision is a deletion process or the endpoint of a continuum of increasing overlap, and to discover whether elision rates vary for individual speakers. Results suggest that the acoustic patterns for elision are consistent with an overlap account. Individual speakers differ as to whether they increase elision only at faster speech rates, or elide regardless of rate. Phonotactic legality per se does not affect elision rates, but speech rate may affect the phonological system by causing a modification of the standard timing relationships among gestures.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)79-112
    Number of pages34
    JournalPhonetica
    Volume63
    Issue number2-3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2006

    Fingerprint

    deletion
    acoustics
    legality
    intuition
    phonetics
    potatoes
    time measurement
    Schwa
    Elision
    Overlap
    continuums

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Language and Linguistics
    • Acoustics and Ultrasonics
    • Linguistics and Language

    Cite this

    Schwa elision in fast speech : Segmental deletion or gestural overlap? / Davidson, Lisa.

    In: Phonetica, Vol. 63, No. 2-3, 2006, p. 79-112.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Davidson, Lisa. / Schwa elision in fast speech : Segmental deletion or gestural overlap?. In: Phonetica. 2006 ; Vol. 63, No. 2-3. pp. 79-112.
    @article{b63e3070535348e892976a446878684d,
    title = "Schwa elision in fast speech: Segmental deletion or gestural overlap?",
    abstract = "Pretonic schwa elision in fast speech (e.g. potato -→ [pt]ato, demolish → [dm]olish) has been studied by both phonologists and phoneticians to understand how extralinguistic factors affect surface forms. Yet, both types of studies have major shortcomings. Phonological analyses attributing schwa elision to acrossthe- board segmental deletion have been based on researchers' intuitions. Phonetic accounts proposing that elision is best characterized as gestural overlap have been restricted to very few sequence types. In this study, 28 different [#C?C-] sequences are examined to define appropriate acoustic criteria for 'elision', to establish whether elision is a deletion process or the endpoint of a continuum of increasing overlap, and to discover whether elision rates vary for individual speakers. Results suggest that the acoustic patterns for elision are consistent with an overlap account. Individual speakers differ as to whether they increase elision only at faster speech rates, or elide regardless of rate. Phonotactic legality per se does not affect elision rates, but speech rate may affect the phonological system by causing a modification of the standard timing relationships among gestures.",
    author = "Lisa Davidson",
    year = "2006",
    doi = "10.1159/000095304",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "63",
    pages = "79--112",
    journal = "Phonetica",
    issn = "0031-8388",
    publisher = "S. Karger AG",
    number = "2-3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Schwa elision in fast speech

    T2 - Segmental deletion or gestural overlap?

    AU - Davidson, Lisa

    PY - 2006

    Y1 - 2006

    N2 - Pretonic schwa elision in fast speech (e.g. potato -→ [pt]ato, demolish → [dm]olish) has been studied by both phonologists and phoneticians to understand how extralinguistic factors affect surface forms. Yet, both types of studies have major shortcomings. Phonological analyses attributing schwa elision to acrossthe- board segmental deletion have been based on researchers' intuitions. Phonetic accounts proposing that elision is best characterized as gestural overlap have been restricted to very few sequence types. In this study, 28 different [#C?C-] sequences are examined to define appropriate acoustic criteria for 'elision', to establish whether elision is a deletion process or the endpoint of a continuum of increasing overlap, and to discover whether elision rates vary for individual speakers. Results suggest that the acoustic patterns for elision are consistent with an overlap account. Individual speakers differ as to whether they increase elision only at faster speech rates, or elide regardless of rate. Phonotactic legality per se does not affect elision rates, but speech rate may affect the phonological system by causing a modification of the standard timing relationships among gestures.

    AB - Pretonic schwa elision in fast speech (e.g. potato -→ [pt]ato, demolish → [dm]olish) has been studied by both phonologists and phoneticians to understand how extralinguistic factors affect surface forms. Yet, both types of studies have major shortcomings. Phonological analyses attributing schwa elision to acrossthe- board segmental deletion have been based on researchers' intuitions. Phonetic accounts proposing that elision is best characterized as gestural overlap have been restricted to very few sequence types. In this study, 28 different [#C?C-] sequences are examined to define appropriate acoustic criteria for 'elision', to establish whether elision is a deletion process or the endpoint of a continuum of increasing overlap, and to discover whether elision rates vary for individual speakers. Results suggest that the acoustic patterns for elision are consistent with an overlap account. Individual speakers differ as to whether they increase elision only at faster speech rates, or elide regardless of rate. Phonotactic legality per se does not affect elision rates, but speech rate may affect the phonological system by causing a modification of the standard timing relationships among gestures.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749354320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749354320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1159/000095304

    DO - 10.1159/000095304

    M3 - Article

    VL - 63

    SP - 79

    EP - 112

    JO - Phonetica

    JF - Phonetica

    SN - 0031-8388

    IS - 2-3

    ER -